IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v276y2014icp14-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stand-level light interception model for horizontally and vertically heterogeneous canopies

Author

Listed:
  • Forrester, David I.

Abstract

Process-based forest growth models often rely on estimates of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation. Light absorption can easily be estimated using the Lambert–Beer law for simple homogeneous canopies composed of one layer, one species, and no canopy gaps. However, forest canopies are usually not homogenous, vertically or horizontally, and detailed tree-level models have been developed to account for this heterogeneity. These models have high input and computational demands and work on a finer temporal and spatial resolution than is often required by stand level growth models, making them impractical for this purpose. The aim of this study was to develop a stand-level “summary” light model that can account for (1) canopy gaps, (2) multiple horizontal canopy layers that may or may not overlap, and (3) multiple components (species, age classes or dominance classes). The model divides the canopy into horizontal layers that consist of a single component, or multiple components whose crowns overlap vertically. The light absorption of each layer is calculated using the Lambert–Beer law and then partitioned to each component in that layer using weightings based on the leaf area, extinction coefficients and the relative heights of each component within the layer. Canopy gaps within each layer are accounted for by assuming a Poisson-distribution of trees, while taking account of crown surface area-to-leaf area ratio and solar zenith angles, which change with latitude and season. The summary model was compared with a detailed tree-level model and performed well for stands containing up to eight components and for a wide range of stand structures, in terms of trees per ha and multiple canopy layers. For both the whole canopy and when partitioning light between individual components the summary model was nearly unbiased with low relative average errors (−0.26% and −0.30%, respectively) and high model efficiencies (0.94 and 0.87, respectively). Further improvements could be achieved by improving the ability of the model to partition light between components within a given layer. This model can be parameterised with easily obtainable information about crown sizes and extinction coefficients and could be used to examine light dynamics in complex canopies and in stand-level growth models.

Suggested Citation

  • Forrester, David I., 2014. "A stand-level light interception model for horizontally and vertically heterogeneous canopies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 14-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:276:y:2014:i:c:p:14-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014000064
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seidl, Rupert & Rammer, Werner & Scheller, Robert M. & Spies, Thomas A., 2012. "An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 87-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pretzsch, Hans & Forrester, David I. & Rötzer, Thomas, 2015. "Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 276-292.
    2. Rahn, Eric & Vaast, Philippe & Läderach, Peter & van Asten, Piet & Jassogne, Laurence & Ghazoul, Jaboury, 2018. "Exploring adaptation strategies of coffee production to climate change using a process-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 76-89.
    3. Forrester, David I. & Tang, Xiaolu, 2016. "Analysing the spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests and the effects of stand density using the 3-PG model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 233-254.
    4. Meine van Noordwijk & Richard Coe & Fergus L. Sinclair & Eike Luedeling & Jules Bayala & Catherine W. Muthuri & Peter Cooper & Roeland Kindt & Lalisa Duguma & Christine Lamanna & Peter A. Minang, 2021. "Climate change adaptation in and through agroforestry: four decades of research initiated by Peter Huxley," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Gupta, Rajit & Sharma, Laxmi Kant, 2019. "The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 55-73.
    6. Xie, Yalin & Lei, Xiangdong & Shi, Jingning, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Xu & He, Hong S. & Liang, Yu & Wu, Zhiwei, 2015. "Evaluating simulated effects of succession, fire, and harvest for LANDIS PRO forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Bohn, Friedrich J. & Frank, Karin & Huth, Andreas, 2014. "Of climate and its resulting tree growth: Simulating the productivity of temperate forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 278(C), pages 9-17.
    3. Petter, Gunnar & Kreft, Holger & Ong, Yongzhi & Zotz, Gerhard & Cabral, Juliano Sarmento, 2021. "Modelling the long-term dynamics of tropical forests: From leaf traits to whole-tree growth patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    4. Lucash, Melissa S. & Marshall, Adrienne M. & Weiss, Shelby A. & McNabb, John W. & Nicolsky, Dmitry J. & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Link, Timothy E. & Vogel, Jason G. & Scheller, Robert M. & Abramoff, Ro, 2023. "Burning trees in frozen soil: Simulating fire, vegetation, soil, and hydrology in the boreal forests of Alaska," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    5. Fitts, Lucia A. & Fraser, Jacob S. & Miranda, Brian R. & Domke, Grant M. & Russell, Matthew B. & Sturtevant, Brian R., 2023. "An iterative site-scale approach to calibrate and corroborate successional processes within a forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    6. Peringer, Alexander & Buttler, Alexandre & Gillet, François & Pătru-Stupariu, Ileana & Schulze, Kiowa A. & Stupariu, Mihai-Sorin & Rosenthal, Gert, 2017. "Disturbance-grazer-vegetation interactions maintain habitat diversity in mountain pasture-woodlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 301-310.
    7. Collalti, Alessio & Perugini, Lucia & Santini, Monia & Chiti, Tommaso & Nolè, Angelo & Matteucci, Giorgio & Valentini, Riccardo, 2014. "A process-based model to simulate growth in forests with complex structure: Evaluation and use of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model in a deciduous forest in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 362-378.
    8. Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar & Arsenault, André, 2014. "Integrated modelling software platform development for effective use of ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 195-202.
    9. Kruse, Stefan & Wieczorek, Mareike & Jeltsch, Florian & Herzschuh, Ulrike, 2016. "Treeline dynamics in Siberia under changing climates as inferred from an individual-based model for Larix," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 101-121.
    10. Emmett, Kristen D. & Renwick, Katherine M. & Poulter, Benjamin, 2021. "Adapting a dynamic vegetation model for regional biomass, plant biogeography, and fire modeling in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Evaluating LPJ-GUESS-LMfireCF," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    11. Frolov, Pavel & Shanin, Vladimir & Zubkova, Elena & Bykhovets, Sergey & Grabarnik, Pavel, 2020. "CAMPUS-S – The model of ground layer vegetation populations in forest ecosystems and their contribution to the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen. I. Problem formulation and description of the model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    12. Sujii, Patricia S. & Nagai, Micael E. & Zucchi, Maria I. & Brancalion, Pedro H.S. & James, Patrick M.A., 2019. "A genetic approach for simulating persistence of reintroduced tree species populations in restored forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 35-43.
    13. Gustafson, Eric J. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Miranda, Brian R. & Duveneck, Matthew J., 2024. "Overcoming conceptual hurdles to accurately represent trees as cohorts in forest landscape models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    14. Mekonnen, Zelalem A. & Grant, Robert F. & Schwalm, Christopher, 2016. "Sensitivity of modeled NEP to climate forcing and soil at site and regional scales: Implications for upscaling ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 241-257.
    15. Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar & Arsenault, André, 2015. "Integrated modelling software platform development for effective use of ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 318-325.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:276:y:2014:i:c:p:14-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.