IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v431y2020ics0304380020302180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Lianwei
  • Li, Wendy
  • Zou, Quan
  • Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)

Abstract

It has been nearly a half-century long since the recognition of Archaea as one of the three kingdoms in the tree of life, but the comparative studies on their ecological adaptations with bacteria in the hot spring environment have been relatively few. We present the first few network analyses of the hot-spring microbiome with 165 hot-spring microbiome samples taken globally by Sharp et al (2014) (with the temperature and pH ranged 7.5°C-99°C and 1.8-9.0, respectively), offering an ideal dataset for investigating the structure and functional interactions in the hot-spring microbiome via network analysis. Here we aim to identify the ecologically adaptive differences between Archaea and Bacteria and discover: (i) Competitions as represented by negative correlations seem to be extremely rare among Archaea species; in contrast, the competitions among Bacteria species are much more common. (ii) Archaea and Bacteria can form their own guilds and occupy their own niches, and pH seems to play an important role in niche differentiations. (iii) The abundances of most Bacteria and Archaea are not correlated to the temperature. Bacteria have slightly more species that are thermo-phobic and no Archaea are thermo-phobic. The temperature may have far more significant influences on species compositions than on species abundance. In other words, most ‘resident’ species can prosper in a wide range of temperatures but some ‘nonresidents’ may encounter difficulties to survive. Theoretically, this is consistent with the classic biogeography dogma of microbes—they may reach everywhere, but environment selects who can stay.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Lianwei & Li, Wendy & Zou, Quan & Ma, Zhanshan (Sam), 2020. "Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020302180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Hannon, Bruce, 2007. "Ecological network analysis: network construction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 49-55.
    2. Zachary D Kurtz & Christian L Müller & Emily R Miraldi & Dan R Littman & Martin J Blaser & Richard A Bonneau, 2015. "Sparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunlap, J. & Schramski, J.R., 2024. "Energy-systems accounting in industrial-natural systems; An energy analysis of a managed forest ecosystem including food web biomass dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    2. Duo Jiang & Thomas Sharpton & Yuan Jiang, 2021. "Microbial Interaction Network Estimation via Bias-Corrected Graphical Lasso," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 329-350, July.
    3. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, Z.M., 2011. "Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological input–output modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2362-2376.
    4. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    5. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 774-783.
    6. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Qin Liu & Qi Su & Fen Zhang & Hein M. Tun & Joyce Wing Yan Mak & Grace Chung-Yan Lui & Susanna So Shan Ng & Jessica Y. L. Ching & Amy Li & Wenqi Lu & Chenyu Liu & Chun Pan Cheung & David S. C. Hui & P, 2022. "Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define COVID-19 severity and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Wang, Shengyan & Li, Bingkang & Zhao, Xudong & Hu, Qianchen & Liu, Da, 2024. "Assessing fossil energy supply security in China using ecological network analysis from a supply chain perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin & Feng, Kuishuang & Liu, Zhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2018. "Interregional carbon flows of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 342-352.
    10. Phillips, Jonathan D., 2011. "Predicting modes of spatial change from state-and-transition models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 475-484.
    11. Runtan Cheng & Lu Wang & Shenglong Le & Yifan Yang & Can Zhao & Xiangqi Zhang & Xin Yang & Ting Xu & Leiting Xu & Petri Wiklund & Jun Ge & Dajiang Lu & Chenhong Zhang & Luonan Chen & Sulin Cheng, 2022. "A randomized controlled trial for response of microbiome network to exercise and diet intervention in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Kim, Daehyun & Phillips, Jonathan D., 2013. "Predicting the structure and mode of vegetation dynamics: An application of graph theory to state-and-transition models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 64-73.
    13. Emma Schwager & Himel Mallick & Steffen Ventz & Curtis Huttenhower, 2017. "A Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Lu, Jingzhao & Lu, Hongwei & Wang, Weipeng & Feng, SanSan & Lei, Kaiwen, 2021. "Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of mining area soil based on land type changes: An information network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    15. Campbell, Elliott T. & Tilley, David R., 2016. "Relationships between renewable emergy storage or flow and biodiversity: A modeling investigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 134-148.
    16. Salas, Andria K. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2011. "Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1192-1204.
    17. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Lloret-Climent, Miguel & Amorós-Jiménez, Rocco & González-Franco, Lucía & Nescolarde-Selva, Josué-Antonio, 2014. "Coverage and invariance for the biological control of pests in mediterranean greenhouses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 37-44.
    19. Lingjing Jiang & Niina Haiminen & Anna‐Paola Carrieri & Shi Huang & Yoshiki Vázquez‐Baeza & Laxmi Parida & Ho‐Cheol Kim & Austin D. Swafford & Rob Knight & Loki Natarajan, 2022. "Utilizing stability criteria in choosing feature selection methods yields reproducible results in microbiome data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1155-1167, September.
    20. Ines Wilms & Jacob Bien, 2021. "Tree-based Node Aggregation in Sparse Graphical Models," Papers 2101.12503, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.