IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v431y2020ics0304380020302180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Lianwei
  • Li, Wendy
  • Zou, Quan
  • Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)

Abstract

It has been nearly a half-century long since the recognition of Archaea as one of the three kingdoms in the tree of life, but the comparative studies on their ecological adaptations with bacteria in the hot spring environment have been relatively few. We present the first few network analyses of the hot-spring microbiome with 165 hot-spring microbiome samples taken globally by Sharp et al (2014) (with the temperature and pH ranged 7.5°C-99°C and 1.8-9.0, respectively), offering an ideal dataset for investigating the structure and functional interactions in the hot-spring microbiome via network analysis. Here we aim to identify the ecologically adaptive differences between Archaea and Bacteria and discover: (i) Competitions as represented by negative correlations seem to be extremely rare among Archaea species; in contrast, the competitions among Bacteria species are much more common. (ii) Archaea and Bacteria can form their own guilds and occupy their own niches, and pH seems to play an important role in niche differentiations. (iii) The abundances of most Bacteria and Archaea are not correlated to the temperature. Bacteria have slightly more species that are thermo-phobic and no Archaea are thermo-phobic. The temperature may have far more significant influences on species compositions than on species abundance. In other words, most ‘resident’ species can prosper in a wide range of temperatures but some ‘nonresidents’ may encounter difficulties to survive. Theoretically, this is consistent with the classic biogeography dogma of microbes—they may reach everywhere, but environment selects who can stay.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Lianwei & Li, Wendy & Zou, Quan & Ma, Zhanshan (Sam), 2020. "Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020302180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Hannon, Bruce, 2007. "Ecological network analysis: network construction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 49-55.
    2. Zachary D Kurtz & Christian L Müller & Emily R Miraldi & Dan R Littman & Martin J Blaser & Richard A Bonneau, 2015. "Sparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunlap, J. & Schramski, J.R., 2024. "Energy-systems accounting in industrial-natural systems; An energy analysis of a managed forest ecosystem including food web biomass dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    2. Duo Jiang & Thomas Sharpton & Yuan Jiang, 2021. "Microbial Interaction Network Estimation via Bias-Corrected Graphical Lasso," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 329-350, July.
    3. Panyam, Varuneswara & Huang, Hao & Davis, Katherine & Layton, Astrid, 2019. "Bio-inspired design for robust power grid networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Comparative ecological network analysis: An application to Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 714-724.
    5. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, Z.M., 2011. "Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological input–output modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2362-2376.
    6. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    7. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 774-783.
    8. Zhijun Luo & Xiaofang Yang & Songkai Luo, 2024. "Land Use Simulation and Ecological Network Construction around Poyang Lake Area in China under the Goal of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Jiarui Lu & Pixu Shi & Hongzhe Li, 2019. "Generalized linear models with linear constraints for microbiome compositional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 235-244, March.
    10. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Qin Liu & Qi Su & Fen Zhang & Hein M. Tun & Joyce Wing Yan Mak & Grace Chung-Yan Lui & Susanna So Shan Ng & Jessica Y. L. Ching & Amy Li & Wenqi Lu & Chenyu Liu & Chun Pan Cheung & David S. C. Hui & P, 2022. "Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define COVID-19 severity and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Gao, Jing & Gong, Jian & Li, Yao & Yang, Jianxin & Liang, Xun, 2024. "Ecological network assessment in dynamic landscapes: Multi-scenario simulation and conservation priority analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Wang, Shengyan & Li, Bingkang & Zhao, Xudong & Hu, Qianchen & Liu, Da, 2024. "Assessing fossil energy supply security in China using ecological network analysis from a supply chain perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Hines, David E. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2014. "A comparison of network, neighborhood, and node levels of analyses in two models of nitrogen cycling in the Cape Fear River Estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 210-220.
    15. Xi Peng & Shang Wang & Miaoxiao Wang & Kai Feng & Qing He & Xingsheng Yang & Weiguo Hou & Fangru Li & Yuxiang Zhao & Baolan Hu & Xiao Zou & Ye Deng, 2024. "Metabolic interdependencies in thermophilic communities are revealed using co-occurrence and complementarity networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Jiali Huang & Robert E Ulanowicz, 2014. "Ecological Network Analysis for Economic Systems: Growth and Development and Implications for Sustainable Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    17. Almpanidou, Vasiliki & Mazaris, Antonios D. & Mertzanis, Yorgos & Avraam, Ioannis & Antoniou, Ioannis & Pantis, John D. & Sgardelis, Stefanos P., 2014. "Providing insights on habitat connectivity for male brown bears: A combination of habitat suitability and landscape graph-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 37-44.
    18. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A., 2011. "Reconnecting environs to their environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2393-2403.
    19. Pratheepa Jeganathan & Susan P. Holmes, 2021. "A Statistical Perspective on the Challenges in Molecular Microbial Biology," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 131-160, June.
    20. Ana Popovic & Celine Bourdon & Pauline W. Wang & David S. Guttman & Sajid Soofi & Zulfiqar A. Bhutta & Robert H. J. Bandsma & John Parkinson & Lisa G. Pell, 2021. "Micronutrient supplements can promote disruptive protozoan and fungal communities in the developing infant gut," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:431:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020302180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.