IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v427y2020ics0304380020301241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The comparative energetics of petrels and penguins

Author

Listed:
  • Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M.

Abstract

Petrels and penguins form the clade Austrodyptornithes. The Add-my-Pet collection of referenced data and Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) parameters presently has 64 members of this clade. Adaptations to their wandering life style could now be studied; I here try to characterise this clade from an energy perspective. It turned out that petrels are in several respects extreme among birds, showing adaptations to life at low mean food levels. Penguins show the same tendency, but less extreme. Almost all petrel species show a weight-reduction well prior to fledging till the adult weight. This permanent weight reduction suggests that the mean adult feeding level is about 80% of the maximum one. This pattern is well-captured by the standard DEB model, in which (energy) reserve plays an important role. They also have relatively large eggs, and long incubation times and low reproduction rates. I argue that large eggs minimize the age at fledging, given that a particular maturity threshold needs to be reached for fledging. Austrodyptornithes have a high age at puberty, which, in combination with low reproduction rates, causes very low maximum population growth rates. The energy allocation to reproduction for petrels is typical among birds, so the low reproduction rates are the results of the large eggs. Another adaptation to low mean food levels is the large stomach/gut capacity, which appeared to be coupled to a high reserve capacity. This points to be an adaptation to a patchy occurrence of their food, probably in combination with spells of poor weather conditions for feeding. Petrels have a high supply stress and altriciality coefficient, compared to birds, while penguins are a very small altriciality coefficient. This reflects a very high maturity level at puberty for both taxa, in combination with high maturity level at birth for petrels and a typical one for penguins. They have a relatively long life span, compared to other birds, but not extreme. The relative egg size of penguins is typical for birds, to smaller than typical. Penguins combine small eggs with long foraging trips, while small young need frequent feeding. They evolved two adaptation for this: crop milk feeding and collecting lipid-rich food for their offspring. The energetic differences that have been found between petrels and penguins may directly relate to feeding in surface waters by petrels and in deeper waters by penguins; seasonal fluctuations in food density are more pronounced in surface waters. The higher clades Aequornithes and Aequorlitornithes are in many respect intermediate between Austrodyptornithes and other birds, demonstrating a clear taxonomic coherence in energy parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The comparative energetics of petrels and penguins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:427:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020301241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M. & Lika, Konstadia & Augustine, Starrlight & Marn, Nina & Kooi, Bob W., 2020. "The energetic basis of population growth in animal kingdom," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    2. Lika, Konstadia & Augustine, Starrlight & Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The use of augmented loss functions for estimating dynamic energy budget parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Long & Ma, Chen & Zhang, Chenghui & Duan, Bin & Cui, Naxin & Li, Changlong, 2023. "Correlations of lithium-ion battery parameter variations and connected configurations on pack statistics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    2. Farooq, Abdul Samad & Zhang, Peng & Gao, Yongfeng & Gulfam, Raza, 2021. "Emerging radiative materials and prospective applications of radiative sky cooling - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. George Selgin, 2021. "The fiscal and monetary response to COVID‐19: What the Great Depression has – and hasn't – taught us," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 3-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The standard dynamic energy budget model has no plausible alternatives," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    2. Lika, Konstadia & Augustine, Starrlight & Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The use of augmented loss functions for estimating dynamic energy budget parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    3. Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2020. "A cohort projection method to follow deb-structured populations with periodic, synchronized and iteroparous reproduction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 436(C).
    4. Sadoul, Bastien & Geffroy, Benjamin & Lallement, Stephane & Kearney, Michael, 2020. "Multiple working hypotheses for hyperallometric reproduction in fishes under metabolic theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    5. Augustine, Starrlight & Lika, Konstadia & Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "Comparing loss functions and interval estimates for survival data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    6. Matyja, Konrad, 2023. "Standard dynamic energy budget model parameter sensitivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    7. Lika, K. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2024. "The metabolic interpretation of the von Bertalanffy growth rate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    8. Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2024. "Ways to reduce or avoid juvenile-driven cycles in individual-based population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    9. Lika, Konstadia & Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2024. "The relationship between confidence intervals and distributions of estimators for parameters of deterministic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    10. Guillaumot, Charlène & Saucède, Thomas & Morley, Simon A. & Augustine, Starrlight & Danis, Bruno & Kooijman, Sebastiaan, 2020. "Can DEB models infer metabolic differences between intertidal and subtidal morphotypes of the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Strebel, 1908)?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:427:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.