IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p278-d90470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians

Author

Listed:
  • Shin-Ruoh Juang

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Szu-Hung Chen

    (Department of Ecosystem Science & Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Chen-Fa Wu

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

Farm ponds are important habitats for amphibians, birds, and other wildlife. In Taiwan, artificial ponds were originally created on farmlands for irrigation purposes and the needs of the domestic water supply. Although pond creation is a typical farming practice, it also provides habitats for pond-breeding amphibians. Thus, it is essential to understand the current status of habitats and their vulnerability regarding urgent conservation needs for target species. Günther’s frog ( Hylarana guentheri ), a pond-breeding amphibian, has a high sensitivity towards surrounding environmental changes, and can be used as an indicator species to assess habitat suitability. The purpose of this study is to establish a systematic framework to assess the habitat suitability of pond-breeding amphibians by using Günther’s frog as a pilot-study species. First, we collected frog survey data from Chiayi, Taiwan, from winter 2013 to spring 2015, and investigated the present status of the environmental conditions around the ponds. Next, expert questionnaires and the fuzzy Delphi method were applied to establish the hierarchical evaluation criteria regarding the habitat suitability assessment. Four indicators: the aquatic environments of farm ponds; the terrestrial environments around ponds; landscape connectivity; and the conservation perceptions of the residents, were determined as first-layer factors in the assessment criteria, while ten other indicators were defined as second-layer factors. Based on the established assessment criteria, we performed in situ habitat suitability evaluations on 69 selected sites and surveyed the perceptions of the residents using questionnaires. Results revealed that 19% of locations were rich in frog species with a high habitat suitability. However, 67% of locations showed signs of habitat degradation, which may imply a higher need in practicing habitat improvement or restoration. The Kappa value was 0.6061, which indicated a high reliability of the habitat suitability assessment model. In brief, the proposed method can be applied, not only to assess the sustainability of frog habitats and degradation risks, but also to determine which locations may require future attention regarding conservation implementation. Furthermore, findings in this study provide useful background knowledge to all associated stakeholders when designing and implementing plans of wildlife habitat management and restoration at farm ponds.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin-Ruoh Juang & Szu-Hung Chen & Chen-Fa Wu, 2017. "An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:278-:d:90470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2013. "The World Bank Annual Report 2013," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16091.
    2. Bennetsen, Elina & Gobeyn, Sacha & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2016. "Species distribution models grounded in ecological theory for decision support in river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 1-12.
    3. World Bank, 2017. "The World Bank Annual Report 2017," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 27986.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chun-Hsien Lai & Shin-Hwei Lin & Chia-Yi Tsai & Szu-Hung Chen, 2018. "Identifying Farm Pond Habitat Suitability for the Common Moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus ): A Conservation-Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reinsberg,Bernhard Wilfried & Michaelowa,Katharina & Knack,Stephen, 2015. "Which donors, which funds ? the choice of multilateral funds by bilateral donors at the World Bank," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7441, The World Bank.
    2. Acurio Vásconez, Verónica & Giraud, Gaël & Mc Isaac, Florent & Pham, Ngoc-Sang, 2015. "The effects of oil price shocks in a new-Keynesian framework with capital accumulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 844-854.
    3. GUPTA Monika, 2019. "Decomposing The Role Of Different Factors In Co2 Emissions Increase In South Asia," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 72-86, April.
    4. Tancrède Voituriez, 2020. "The quest for green welfare state in developing countries," Working Papers hal-02876972, HAL.
    5. Charyulu, Kumara D. & Singh, N.P. & Shyam, Moses D. & Bantilan, C., 2014. "Development and Diffusion of Dryland Cereals in Semi-Arid Tropics of India — Role of Partnerships," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 27(Conferenc).
    6. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "South Korean energy scenarios show how nuclear power can reduce future energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-578.
    7. Naveed Ali & Olivier Karl Butzbach & Habib Ali Katohar & Hassan Imran Afridi, 2024. "Structural and External Barriers to Pakistan’s Economic Growth: Pathways to Sustainable Development," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Paula Hanasz, 2017. "A Little Less Conversation? Track II Dialogue and Transboundary Water Governance," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 296-309, May.
    9. Filipe Lage de Sousa & Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, 2018. "Relaxing credit constraints in emerging economies: The impact of public loans on the productivity of Brazilian manufacturers," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 154, pages 23-47.
    10. Charles Yaw Okyere & Ama Asantewah Ahene-Codjoe, 2022. "Irrigated Agriculture and Welfare: Panel Data Evidence from Southern Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 583-610, April.
    11. Shazia Kousar & Farhan Ahmed & Muhammad Afzal & Juan E. Trinidad Segovia, 2023. "Is government spending in the education and health sector necessary for human capital development?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Naoko Uchiyama, 2016. "Consumption Smoothing, Risk Sharing and Household Vulnerability in Rural Mexico," Discussion Paper Series DP2016-06, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    13. Nathaniel, Solomon Prince & Yalçiner, Kürşat & Bekun, Festus Victor, 2021. "Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Magalhães, Júlia & Ziebold, Carolina & Evans-Lacko, Sara & Matijasevich, Alicia & Paula, Cristiane Silvestre, 2024. "Health, economic and social impacts of the Brazilian cash transfer program on the lives of its beneficiaries: a scoping review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125534, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Ashrita Saran & Sabina Singh & Neha Gupta & Sujata Chodankar Walke & Ranjana Rao & Christine Simiyu & Suchi Malhotra & Avni Mishra & Ranjitha Puskur & Edoardo Masset & Howard White & Hugh Sharma Waddi, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Interventions promoting resilience through climate‐smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    16. Mukherjee, Swayambhu & Kar, Saibal, 2020. "Leveraging Non-Farm Income: Micro-evidence of Occupational Choice for Rural Households in India," MPRA Paper 109940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Soma, Chakrabarti, 2019. "The West and Central Africa Advantage," IFAD Advantage Series 304754, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    18. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Paul Stubbs, 2013. "Mind the Gap: Citizens’ and Companies’ Views of Business Culture in Croatia," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 15(1), pages 89-114, April.
    19. Kerim Peren Arin & Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Kyriacos Kyriacou & Nicola Spagnolo, 2020. "Financial Integration in the GCC Region: Market Size Versus National Effects," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 309-316, April.
    20. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:278-:d:90470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.