IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v400y2019icp34-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate, rather than human disturbance, is the main driver of age-specific mortality trajectories in a tropical tree

Author

Listed:
  • Gaoue, Orou G.
  • Horvitz, Carol C.
  • Steiner, Ulrich K.
  • Tuljapurkar, Shripad

Abstract

Environmental and anthropogenic stressors can interact (e.g., drought, harvest or herbivory) to shape plant demography and evolutionary strategies with implications for sustainable resource management plans. Harvest or recurrent biomass removal can act as a selective force. However, our understanding of how harvest and changes in climate can synergistically shape plant evolutionary strategies is limited. We used age-from-stage matrix modeling to investigate how chronic anthropogenic disturbance (severe foliage and bark harvest) affects age-specific mortality trajectories of a tropical tree, Khaya senegalensis in two contrasting climatic regions (dry versus moist) in West Africa. We then developed a stochastic model to test if changes in disturbance regime and the environmental conditions in which a cohort is born may alter stochastic age-specific mortality rates. The effect of harvest on age-specific mortality trajectories was modest and only noticeable in the moist region. Age-specific mortality trajectories differed significantly between regions. In the moist region, mortality rates decreased with age for the first 30 years of life to a minimum rate and then increased gradually after to reach an old age mortality plateau. In the dry region, mortality rates decreased with age to reach a plateau asymptotically. This difference in age-specific mortality trajectory is due to a greater delay in reaching reproductive size/age in the dry region. Our findings underscore intraspecific variation in age-specific mortality schedules and indicate that climatic effect may override the impact of anthropogenic activities on plant demography. Harvest, by favoring fast life stage transition to reproductive stages, can buffer the effect of drought.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaoue, Orou G. & Horvitz, Carol C. & Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2019. "Climate, rather than human disturbance, is the main driver of age-specific mortality trajectories in a tropical tree," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 400(C), pages 34-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:400:y:2019:i:c:p:34-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.03.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019301048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.03.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole Guedje & Jean Lejoly & Bernard Aloys Nkongmeneck & W.B.J. W.B.J. Jonkers, 2003. "Population dynamics of Garcinia lucida (Clusiaceae) in Cameroonian Atlantic forests," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/181113, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. James W. Vaupel & Annette Baudisch & Martin Dölling & Deborah A. Roach & Jutta Gampe, 2004. "The case for negative senescence," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2004-002, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hostenkamp, Gisela & Stolpe, Michael, 2008. "Optimal health and retirement policies amid population aging," Kiel Working Papers 1428, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Cyrus Chu, C.Y. & Chien, Hung-Ken & Lee, Ronald D., 2010. "The evolutionary theory of time preferences and intergenerational transfers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 451-464, December.
    3. Annette Baudisch & James W. Vaupel, 2009. "Senescence vs. sustenance: evolutionary-demographic models of aging," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-040, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    4. Aburto, José Manuel & Basellini, Ugofilippo & Baudisch, Annette & Villavicencio, Francisco, 2022. "Drewnowski’s index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-10.
    5. James W. Vaupel, 2009. "Lively Questions for Demographers about Death at Older Ages," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 347-356, June.
    6. Stefano Giaimo & Arne Traulsen, 2022. "The selection force weakens with age because ageing evolves and not vice versa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Mansour Shrahili & Abdulhakim A. Albabtain & Mohamed Kayid & Zahra Kaabi, 2020. "Stochastic Aspects of Proportional Vitalities Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Annette Baudisch, 2009. "How ageing is shaped by trade-offs," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-043, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    9. James R. Carey, 2008. "Biodemography: Research prospects and directions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(50), pages 1749-1758.
    10. Chevallier, Damien & Mourrain, Baptiste & Girondot, Marc, 2020. "Modelling leatherback biphasic indeterminate growth using a modified Gompertz equation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).
    11. MARK BEBBINGTON & CHIN-DIEW LAI & RIcARDAS ZITIKIS, 2011. "Modelling Deceleration in Senescent Mortality," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 18-37.
    12. James W. Vaupel & Zhen Zhang, 2012. "The difference between alternative averages," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(15), pages 419-428.
    13. Krish Sanghvi & Regina Vega-Trejo & Shinichi Nakagawa & Samuel J. L. Gascoigne & Sheri L. Johnson & Roberto Salguero-Gómez & Tommaso Pizzari & Irem Sepil, 2024. "Meta-analysis shows no consistent evidence for senescence in ejaculate traits across animals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2005. "Aging: damage accumulation versus increasing mortality rate," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-018, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    15. Jos'e Manuel Aburto & Ugofilippo Basellini & Annette Baudisch & Francisco Villavicencio, 2021. "Drewnowski's index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table," Papers 2111.11256, arXiv.org.
    16. James W. Vaupel & Annette Baudisch & Martin Dölling & Deborah A. Roach & Jutta Gampe, 2004. "The case for negative senescence," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2004-002, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    17. Chu, C.Y. Cyrus & Chien, Hung-Ken & Lee, Ronald D., 2008. "Explaining the optimality of U-shaped age-specific mortality," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 171-180.
    18. Solefack, Marie Caroline Momo & Beeckman, Hans & Temgoua, Lucie Felicite & Kinjouo, Ghislain Kenguem, 2017. "Anatomical Characteristics of Garcinia lucida (Vesque) and Scorodophloeus zenkeri (Harms) Wood and Debarking Response in the South Region Cameroon," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(4), November.
    19. Maria G. Perozek, 2005. "Using subjective expectations to forecast longevity: do survey respondents know something we don't know?," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2005-68, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:400:y:2019:i:c:p:34-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.