IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v388y2018icp72-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grazing decreased water use efficiency in Central Asia from 1979 to 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Qifei
  • Li, Chaofan
  • Zhao, Chengyi
  • Zhang, Yaoqi
  • Li, Shoubo

Abstract

Accurate predictions of water vapor at large temporal and spatial scales are particularly important in global studies. In recent years, Central Asian grasslands have been subject to both intensive grazing and variability in climatic conditions. However, uncertainties about grazing on water cycling under climate change still exist. Therefore, the Biome-BGC grazing model was applied to assess the effects of grazing on evapotranspiration (ET) and water use efficiency (WUE). Three grassland types were studied during the period 1979–2011: forest meadow (FM), temperate grassland (TG) and desert grassland (DG). ET shows a gradual decreasing trend from FM (365.65 ± 36.86 mm m−2 yr−1) to DG (183.32 ± 21.15 mm m−2 yr−1), and WUE ranging from 0.62 ± 0.03 g C kg-1 H2O in FM to 1.12 ± 0.10 g C kg−1 H2O in TG, with an average of 0.83 ± 0.05 g C kg−1 H2O. Although there was a significant decrease in ET of 1.47–2.72 mm m−2 yr−1, WUE increased at a rate of 0.004 g C kg−1 H2O yr−1 in Central Asia. From 1979 to 2011, grazing lowered ET by 7.47% in Central Asia; the reduction rates for FM, TG and DG were 3.10%, 12.70% and 7.42%, respectively. In general, grazing decreased WUE by 3.60%. From non-grazed to grazed scenario, WUE increased by 6.86% for FM, but WUE decreased by 7.27% and 5.61% for TG and DG. An over-compensation of GPP under grazing might account for the higher WUE under certain grazing intensities. In order to achieve maximum utilization of water efficiency, proper grazing intensity for TG, DG and FM should be limited to 0.17, 0.39 and 0.38 head/ha, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Qifei & Li, Chaofan & Zhao, Chengyi & Zhang, Yaoqi & Li, Shoubo, 2018. "Grazing decreased water use efficiency in Central Asia from 1979 to 2011," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 72-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:388:y:2018:i:c:p:72-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001830317X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hidy, D. & Barcza, Z. & Haszpra, L. & Churkina, G. & Pintér, K. & Nagy, Z., 2012. "Development of the Biome-BGC model for simulation of managed herbaceous ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 99-119.
    2. Singh, Sukhbir & Boote, Kenneth J. & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan K., 2017. "Estimating water balance, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of spring safflower using the CROPGRO model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 137-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Cai & Chaofan Li & Geping Luo & Chi Zhang & Friday Uchenna Ochege & Steven Caluwaerts & Lesley De Cruz & Rozemien De Troch & Sara Top & Piet Termonia & Philippe De Maeyer, 2020. "The Responses of the Ecosystems in the Tianshan North Slope under Multiple Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios in the Middle of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longo-Minnolo, G. & Vanella, D. & Consoli, S. & Intrigliolo, D.S. & Ramírez-Cuesta, J.M., 2020. "Integrating forecast meteorological data into the ArcDualKc model for estimating spatially distributed evapotranspiration rates of a citrus orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Sun, Qingling & Li, Baolin & Zhang, Tao & Yuan, Yecheng & Gao, Xizhang & Ge, Jinsong & Li, Fei & Zhang, Zhijun, 2017. "An improved Biome-BGC model for estimating net primary productivity of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 55-68.
    3. Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever & Zoltán Barcza & Dóra Hidy & Anikó Kern & Doroteja Dimoski & Slobodan Miko & Ozren Hasan & Branka Grahovac & Hrvoje Marjanović, 2021. "Evaluation of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model Biome-BGCMuSo for Modelling Soil Organic Carbon under Different Land Uses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Kipling, Richard P. & Bannink, André & Bellocchi, Gianni & Dalgaard, Tommy & Fox, Naomi J. & Hutchings, Nicholas J. & Kjeldsen, Chris & Lacetera, Nicola & Sinabell, Franz & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & va, 2016. "Modeling European ruminant production systems: Facing the challenges of climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 24-37.
    5. Chaobin Zhang & Ying Zhang & Jianlong Li, 2019. "Grassland Productivity Response to Climate Change in the Hulunbuir Steppes of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Xiaotao Huang & Yongsheng Yang & Chunbo Chen & Hongfei Zhao & Buqing Yao & Zhen Ma & Li Ma & Huakun Zhou, 2022. "Quantifying and Mapping Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity in Qinghai Grasslands in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Mulazzani, Rodrigo Pivoto & Gubiani, Paulo Ivonir & Zanon, Alencar Junior & Drescher, Marta Sandra & Schenato, Ricardo Bergamo & Girardello, Vitor Cauduro, 2022. "Impact of soil compaction on 30-year soybean yield simulated with CROPGRO-DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Qifei Han & Geping Luo & Chaofan Li & Shoubo Li, 2018. "Response of Carbon Dynamics to Climate Change Varied among Different Vegetation Types in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:388:y:2018:i:c:p:72-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.