IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v356y2017icp73-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling terrestrial ecosystem productivity of an estuarine ecosystem in the Sundarban Biosphere Region, India using seven ecosystem models

Author

Listed:
  • Sannigrahi, Srikanta

Abstract

The net primary production (NPP) is a key indicator for assessing the terrestrial carbon pools and fluxes from the atmosphere to biosphere in any given ecosystem. Adequate measurement of the sensitivity and uncertainty of regional and global carbon pools and fluxes in different climatic and anthropogenic regimes is needed to properly investigate the terrestrial carbon balance. Remote sensing light use efficiency (LUE) approaches can be used to quantify the terrestrial NPP accurately. Using LUE models, NPP was calculated for last two decades of an estuarine ecosystem, the Sundarban Biosphere region, India. Results from seven LUE models: Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA), Global Production Efficiency Model (GLO-PEM), Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM), Eddy Covariance-Light Use Efficiency (EC-LUE), MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MOD17), Temperature and Greenness (TG), Greenness and Radiation (GR) models were compared to ascertain model consistency for NPP estimation during the study period 2000–2013. To optimize structural biases in the model accurate parameterization and systematic multi-method assessment were employed. The influence of the input drivers (biophysical, bioclimatic and environmental stress) on model performances was evaluated. Best model performances were observed over cropland, followed by mixed forest and mangrove ecoregion, respectively. Amongst all model, EC-LUE simulated higher NPP at mangrove ecoregion, while the MOD17 model simulated lower NPP in most of the evaluated biomes. In addition, TG and GR models exhibited larger unexplained variances and found statistically significant at mixed forest site. This error was attributed to the absence of environmental stress factors used to drive these model. GLO-PEM and VPM corroborate with NPP prediction among all LUE models. All seven LUE models predict the statistically significant NPP across the biomes and, the poor model performance is attributed to the different parameterization scheme executed for defining the biophysical and stress variables. Biophysical drivers mostly controlled the model performances, followed by environmental stress and bioclimatic drivers, respectively. This analysis is suggesting that the TG and GR model (driven only by the biophysical factors) could be useful in NPP predictions in the regions with no meteorological inputs and real-time eddy covariance flux tower measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Sannigrahi, Srikanta, 2017. "Modeling terrestrial ecosystem productivity of an estuarine ecosystem in the Sundarban Biosphere Region, India using seven ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 73-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:73-90
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016306391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mandal, Sudipto & Ray, Santanu & Ghosh, Phani Bhusan, 2013. "Impact of mangrove litterfall on nitrogen dynamics of virgin and reclaimed islands of Sundarban mangrove ecosystem, India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 153-166.
    2. Li, Zhengpeng & Liu, Shuguang & Tan, Zhengxi & Bliss, Norman B. & Young, Claudia J. & West, Tristram O. & Ogle, Stephen M., 2014. "Comparing cropland net primary production estimates from inventory, a satellite-based model, and a process-based model in the Midwest of the United States," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 277(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Huntzinger, D.N. & Post, W.M. & Wei, Y. & Michalak, A.M. & West, T.O. & Jacobson, A.R. & Baker, I.T. & Chen, J.M. & Davis, K.J. & Hayes, D.J. & Hoffman, F.M. & Jain, A.K. & Liu, S. & McGuire, A.D. & N, 2012. "North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 144-157.
    4. Dong, Xiaobin & Yang, Weikun & Ulgiati, Sergio & Yan, Maochao & Zhang, Xinshi, 2012. "The impact of human activities on natural capital and ecosystem services of natural pastures in North Xinjiang, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 28-39.
    5. Mukherjee, Joyita & Ray, Santanu & Ghosh, Phani Bhusan, 2013. "A system dynamic modeling of carbon cycle from mangrove litter to the adjacent Hooghly estuary, India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 185-195.
    6. Yuan, Wenping & Cai, Wenwen & Liu, Shuguang & Dong, Wenjie & Chen, Jiquan & Arain, M. Altaf & Blanken, Peter D. & Cescatti, Alessandro & Wohlfahrt, Georg & Georgiadis, Teodoro & Genesio, Lorenzo & Gia, 2014. "Vegetation-specific model parameters are not required for estimating gross primary production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Zhang, Liang-Xia & Zhou, De-Cheng & Fan, Jiang-Wen & Hu, Zhong-Min, 2015. "Comparison of four light use efficiency models for estimating terrestrial gross primary production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 30-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alphonse Kayiranga & Baozhang Chen & Fei Wang & Winny Nthangeni & Adil Dilawar & Yves Hategekimana & Huifang Zhang & Lifeng Guo, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Gross Primary Productivity and Their Responses to Climate in the Great Lakes Region of Sub-Saharan Africa during 2001–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Qipeng Liao & Zhe Wang & Chunbo Huang, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Offset the Negative Ecological Effects of Urbanization and Storing Water in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengjin Xiao & Qiufeng Liu & Yuqing Xu, 2022. "Estimation of Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity in the Yellow River Basin of China Using Light Use Efficiency Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Li, Zhengpeng & Liu, Shuguang & Zhang, Xuesong & West, Tristram O. & Ogle, Stephen M. & Zhou, Naijun, 2016. "Evaluating land cover influences on model uncertainties—A case study of cropland carbon dynamics in the Mid-Continent Intensive Campaign region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 176-187.
    3. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Xianming Dou & Yongguo Yang & Jinhui Luo, 2018. "Estimating Forest Carbon Fluxes Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Matinzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Abedi Koupai, Jahangir & Sadeghi-Lari, Adnan & Nozari, Hamed & Shayannejad, Mohammad, 2017. "Development of an innovative integrated model for the simulation of nitrogen dynamics in farmlands with drainage systems using the system dynamics approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 11-28.
    6. Zhang, Jiarui & Jørgensen, Sven E. & Lu, Jianjian & Nielsen, Søren N. & Wang, Qiang, 2014. "A model for the contribution of macrophyte-derived organic carbon in harvested tidal freshwater marshes to surrounding estuarine and oceanic ecosystems and its response to global warming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 105-116.
    7. Sohl, Terry L. & Wimberly, Michael C. & Radeloff, Volker C. & Theobald, David M. & Sleeter, Benjamin M., 2016. "Divergent projections of future land use in the United States arising from different models and scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 281-297.
    8. Krishna, Dyvavani K. & Watham, Taibanganba & Padalia, Hitendra & Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata, 2023. "Improved gross primary productivity estimation using semi empirical (PRELES) model for moist Indian sal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    9. Zhang, Can & Su, Bo & Beckmann, Michael & Volk, Martin, 2024. "Emergy-based evaluation of ecosystem services: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Adhurya, Sagar & Das, Suvendu & Ray, Santanu, 2021. "Simulating the effects of aquatic avifauna on the Phosphorus dynamics of aquatic systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    11. Mellino, Salvatore & Ripa, Maddalena & Zucaro, Amalia & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2014. "An emergy–GIS approach to the evaluation of renewable resource flows: A case study of Campania Region, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 103-112.
    12. Jiang, Wei, 2017. "Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 10-16.
    13. Yan, Hao & Wang, Shao-qiang & Billesbach, Dave & Oechel, Walter & Bohrer, Gil & Meyers, Tilden & Martin, Timothy A. & Matamala, Roser & Phillips, Richard P. & Rahman, Faiz & Yu, Qin & Shugart, Herman , 2015. "Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a new definition of water stress factor and a separate treatment of C3 and C4 plants," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 42-59.
    14. You, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zhang, J.L., 2014. "Modeling regional ecosystem development under uncertainty – A case study for New Binhai District of Tianjin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 127-142.
    15. Berlin, M. & Suresh Kumar, G. & Nambi, Indumathi M., 2014. "Numerical modelling on transport of nitrogen from wastewater and fertilizer applied on paddy fields," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 278(C), pages 85-99.
    16. Song, Wei & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yuan, Yongwei & Wang, Zhan & Li, Zhaohua, 2015. "Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 245-253.
    17. Jian Zhang & Meixia Ren & Xin Lu & Yu Li & Jianjun Cao, 2022. "Effect of the Belt and Road Initiatives on Trade and Its Related LUCC and Ecosystem Services of Central Asian Nations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Fengjiao Ma & A. Egrinya Eneji & Jintong Liu, 2014. "Understanding Relationships among Agro-Ecosystem Services Based on Emergy Analysis in Luancheng County, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Lee, Dong Joo & Brown, Mark T., 2021. "Estimating the Value of Global Ecosystem Structure and Productivity: A Geographic Information System and Emergy Based Approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    20. Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "Comparison of several models for estimating gross primary production of drip-irrigated maize in arid regions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:73-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.