IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v356y2017icp162-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a bioenergetic model for estimating energy requirements and prey biomass consumption of the bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus

Author

Listed:
  • Bejarano, Adriana C.
  • Wells, Randall S.
  • Costa, Daniel P.

Abstract

The bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) is a common species in coastal temperate waters and the ideal candidate for developing a conceptual bioenergetic model given that sufficient information is available to parameterize key input variables. A bioenergetic model was developed to estimate annual energy requirements (MJ/year) and prey biomass consumption (t/year) based on model variations of Field Metabolic Rates (FMR) that included percent of body mass (FMRBodyMass), Kleiber’s scaling equation (FMRKleiber), and measured FMRs (FMRMeasured). Bioenergetic requirements were generated by incorporating the intrinsic uncertainty of input model variables based on assumed or data-driven assignments of sampling distributions. Gompertz growth functions were used to generate body lengths (cm) as a function of age, which once converted to body mass (kg), were used in all calculations. Annual bioenergetic estimates differed across model variations (FMRMeasured>FMRKleiber>FMRBodyMass) and were on average 22%–34% higher in female calves than in male calves, 3%–7% higher in subadult/immature females than in males, and 12%–18% higher in adult males than in non-lactating adult females. Average estimates were ∼72% and 31%–34% higher in lactating adult females compared to non-lactating adult females and adult males, respectively. Annual bioenergetic requirements for ≥2year old dolphins normalized by body mass were FMRMeasured: 205±29MJ/kg/year and 34±5kg/kg/year, FMRKleiber: 151±29MJ/kg/year and 22±5kg/kg/year, and FMRBodyMass: 138±38MJ/kg/year and 20±5kg/kg/year. When applying the bioenergetic model to the US bottlenose dolphin stock with the largest dolphin abundance (n=950), estimates of annual bioenergetic requirements were 2040–3050 MJ*104/year and 2900–5070t/year. While the existing information provides the foundation to develop a bioenergetic model specific for bottlenose dolphins, improvements of this and related models require additional data on field measurements of metabolic rates, cost of lactation, caloric intake and metabolization efficiency. This bioenergetic model could be used to better understand the complex ecological and trophic interactions of bottlenose dolphins with their prey populations, to evaluate the role of disturbance on bioenergetic requirements, and to inform management and conservation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bejarano, Adriana C. & Wells, Randall S. & Costa, Daniel P., 2017. "Development of a bioenergetic model for estimating energy requirements and prey biomass consumption of the bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 162-172.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:162-172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380017300595
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Laure Delignette-Muller & Christophe Dutang, 2015. "fitdistrplus : An R Package for Fitting Distributions," Post-Print hal-01616147, HAL.
    2. N.M. Thometz & M.M. Staedler & J.A. Tomoleoni & J.L. Bodkin & G.B. Bentall & M.T. Tinker, 2016. "Trade-offs between energy maximization and parental care in a central place forager, the sea otter," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1552-1566.
    3. Delignette-Muller, Marie Laure & Dutang, Christophe, 2015. "fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 64(i04).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merel Goedegebuure & Jessica Melbourne-Thomas & Stuart P Corney & Clive R McMahon & Mark A Hindell, 2018. "Modelling southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina using an individual-based model coupled with a dynamic energy budget," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-37, March.
    2. McHuron, Elizabeth A. & Castellote, Manuel & Himes Boor, Gina K. & Shelden, Kim E.W. & Warlick, Amanda J. & McGuire, Tamara L. & Wade, Paul R. & Goetz, Kimberly T., 2023. "Modeling the impacts of a changing and disturbed environment on an endangered beluga whale population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulte, Benedikt & Sachs, Anna-Lena, 2020. "The price-setting newsvendor with Poisson demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 125-137.
    2. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wang, Melantha & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "SynthETIC: An individual insurance claim simulator with feature control," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 296-308.
    3. K. G. Reddy & M. G. M. Khan, 2020. "stratifyR: An R Package for optimal stratification and sample allocation for univariate populations," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(3), pages 383-405, September.
    4. Chen, Shang & He, Liang & Cao, Yinxuan & Wang, Runhong & Wu, Lianhai & Wang, Zhao & Zou, Yufeng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Xiong, Wei & Liu, Manshuang & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoming & He, J, 2021. "Comparisons among four different upscaling strategies for cultivar genetic parameters in rainfed spring wheat phenology simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Riva-Palacio, Alan & Leisen, Fabrizio, 2021. "Compound vectors of subordinators and their associated positive Lévy copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Minji Lee & Sun Ju Chung & Youngjo Lee & Sera Park & Jun-Gun Kwon & Dai Jin Kim & Donghwan Lee & Jung-Seok Choi, 2020. "Investigation of Correlated Internet and Smartphone Addiction in Adolescents: Copula Regression Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Veronesi, F. & Grassi, S. & Raubal, M., 2016. "Statistical learning approach for wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 836-850.
    8. Phillip M. Gurman & Tom Ross & Andreas Kiermeier, 2018. "Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Salmonellosis from the Consumption of Australian Pork: Minced Meat from Retail to Burgers Prepared and Consumed at Home," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2625-2645, December.
    9. Adam R. Martin & Rachel O. Mariani & Kimberley A. Cathline & Michael Duncan & Nicholas J. Paroshy & Gavin Robertson, 2022. "Soil Compaction Drives an Intra-Genotype Leaf Economics Spectrum in Wine Grapes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Héctor Nájera & David Gordon, 2023. "A Monte Carlo Study of Some Empirical Methods to Find the Optimal Poverty Line in Multidimensional Poverty Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 391-419, June.
    11. Athanasios Zisos & Georgia-Konstantina Sakki & Andreas Efstratiadis, 2023. "Mixing Renewable Energy with Pumped Hydropower Storage: Design Optimization under Uncertainty and Other Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Valentas Gruzauskas & Aurelija Burinskiene & Andrius Krisciunas, 2023. "Application of Information-Sharing for Resilient and Sustainable Food Delivery in Last-Mile Logistics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Amanda M. Wilson & Kelly A. Reynolds & Marc P. Verhougstraete & Robert A. Canales, 2019. "Validation of a Stochastic Discrete Event Model Predicting Virus Concentration on Nurse Hands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1812-1824, August.
    14. Wang, Xialin & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2021. "Modelling payments for ecosystem services for solving future water conflicts at spatial scales: The Okavango River Basin example," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Sarra Ghaddab & Manel Kacem & Christian Peretti & Lotfi Belkacem, 2023. "Extreme severity modeling using a GLM-GPD combination: application to an excess of loss reinsurance treaty," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1105-1127, September.
    16. Kun Mo Lee & Min Hyeok Lee & Jong Seok Lee & Joo Young Lee, 2020. "Uncertainty Analysis of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Simulated by the Parametric Monte Carlo Simulation and Nonparametric Bootstrap Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Alexander Webb & Pramesh Kumar & Alireza Khani, 2020. "Estimation of passenger waiting time using automatically collected transit data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 299-311, June.
    18. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2019. "Tales from tails: On the empirical distributions of forecasting errors and their implication to risk," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 687-698.
    19. Negahban, Ashkan, 2019. "Simulation-based estimation of the real demand in bike-sharing systems in the presence of censoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 317-332.
    20. Kalanka P. Jayalath, 2021. "Fiducial Inference on the Right Censored Birnbaum–Saunders Data via Gibbs Sampler," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:162-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.