IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v336y2016icp26-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of geomorphic unit spatial distribution on nitrogen retention and removal in a large river

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Laurence
  • Davis, Lisa
  • Cohen, Sagy
  • Chapman, Elise
  • Edmonds, Jennifer W.

Abstract

Fluvial geomorphic features drive nutrient dynamics in river systems that have only recently begun to be incorporated into conceptual and numerical models designed to predict nutrient yields and flux. The role of channel geomorphic units (pools, riffles, etc.) and their associated aquatic communities in determining nitrogen retention and removal in aquatic ecosystems is understudied. Here we study the effects of the spatial distribution of geomorphic features on within-channel nitrate dynamics. We developed an agent-based model that simulates biological and hydrological processes involved in nitrate retention and removal occurring in a river segment of the 6th order Cahaba River, AL (USA). We simulated nitrate retention and removal under three scenarios in which the total area of geomorphic units were held constant while their longitudinal distributions were manipulated under low and high nitrate supply levels (relative to biological demand). High nitrate supply simulations suppressed any effect caused by differing longitudinal sequence of geomorphic units/aquatic communities. In contrast, low nitrate supply simulations demonstrated differences in total potential nitrate retention and removal for the study segment based on the spatial distribution of geomorphic units/aquatic communities. Our findings suggest that the spatial arrangement of geomorphic units and their associated aquatic communities can be an important control on nitrogen dynamics in large rivers, demonstrating that fluvial geomorphic features merit consideration when nutrient retention and removal in rivers is examined. Thus, measures of channel geomorphology employed in water quality management, biogeochemical studies, and to evaluate the efficacy of restoration efforts on nutrient levels should be broadened to include characterization of the spatial configuration of geomorphic units and their associated aquatic communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Laurence & Davis, Lisa & Cohen, Sagy & Chapman, Elise & Edmonds, Jennifer W., 2016. "The influence of geomorphic unit spatial distribution on nitrogen retention and removal in a large river," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 26-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:336:y:2016:i:c:p:26-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016301983
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard B. Alexander & Richard A. Smith & Gregory E. Schwarz, 2000. "Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6771), pages 758-761, February.
    2. Patrick J. Mulholland & Ashley M. Helton & Geoffrey C. Poole & Robert O. Hall & Stephen K. Hamilton & Bruce J. Peterson & Jennifer L. Tank & Linda R. Ashkenas & Lee W. Cooper & Clifford N. Dahm & Walt, 2008. "Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7184), pages 202-205, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilfred M. Wollheim & Tamara K. Harms & Andrew L. Robison & Lauren E. Koenig & Ashley M. Helton & Chao Song & William B. Bowden & Jacques C. Finlay, 2022. "Superlinear scaling of riverine biogeochemical function with watershed size," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Weili Duan & Bin He & Daniel Nover & Guishan Yang & Wen Chen & Huifang Meng & Shan Zou & Chuanming Liu, 2016. "Water Quality Assessment and Pollution Source Identification of the Eastern Poyang Lake Basin Using Multivariate Statistical Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Liem Tran & Robert O’Neill & Elizabeth Smith & Randall Bruins & Carol Harden, 2013. "Application of Hierarchy Theory to Cross-Scale Hydrologic Modeling of Nutrient Loads," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(5), pages 1601-1617, March.
    4. Ruikang Sun & Jiawei Dong & Yi Li & Panwen Li & Yaning Liu & Ying Liu & Jinghong Feng, 2022. "The Influence Research on Nitrogen Transport and Reaction in the Hyporheic Zone with an In-Stream Structure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Karki, Seema & Webb, J Angus & Stewardson, Michael J. & Fowler, Keirnan & Kattel, Giri Raj, 2023. "Basin-scale riverine ecosystem services vary with network geometry," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Jinhui Zhou & Laura Scherer & Peter M. van Bodegom & Arthur Beusen & José M. Mogollón, 2022. "Regionalized nitrogen fate in freshwater systems on a global scale," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 907-922, June.
    7. Xuedong Liang & Dongyang Si & Jing Xu, 2018. "Quantitative Evaluation of the Sustainable Development Capacity of Hydropower in China Based on Information Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Shang, Xiao & Wang, Xinze & Zhang, Dalei & Chen, Weidong & Chen, Xuechu & Kong, Hainan, 2012. "An improved SWAT-based computational framework for identifying critical source areas for agricultural pollution at the lake basin scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Greenhalgh, Suzie & Faeth, Paul, 2001. "A Water Quality Strategy For The Mississippi River Basin And The Gulf Of Mexico," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20528, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Claassen, Roger & Aillery, Marcel P. & Nickerson, Cynthia J., 2007. "Integrating Commodity and Conservation Programs: Design Options and Outcomes," Economic Research Report 6703, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Lu, Jun & Gong, Dongqin & Shen, Yena & Liu, Mei & Chen, Dingjiang, 2013. "An inversed Bayesian modeling approach for estimating nitrogen export coefficients and uncertainty assessment in an agricultural watershed in eastern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 79-88.
    12. Wagenschein, Dierk & Rode, Michael, 2008. "Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—A case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 224-232.
    13. Gowda, Prasanna H. & Mulla, David J. & Jaynes, Dan B., 2008. "Simulated long-term nitrogen losses for a midwestern agricultural watershed in the United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 616-624, May.
    14. Tranmer, Andrew W. & Marti, Clelia L. & Tonina, Daniele & Benjankar, Rohan & Weigel, Dana & Vilhena, Leticia & McGrath, Claire & Goodwin, Peter & Tiedemann, Matthew & Mckean, Jim & Imberger, Jörg, 2018. "A hierarchical modelling framework for assessing physical and biochemical characteristics of a regulated river," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 78-93.
    15. Schuwirth, Nele & Acuña, Vicenç & Reichert, Peter, 2011. "Development of a mechanistic model (ERIMO-I) for analyzing the temporal dynamics of the benthic community of an intermittent Mediterranean stream," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 91-104.
    16. Minjin Lee & Charles A. Stock & Elena Shevliakova & Sergey Malyshev & Maureen Beaudor & Nicolas Vuichard, 2024. "Uneven consequences of global climate mitigation pathways on regional water quality in the 21st century," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Yong Li & Yi Wang & Ji Liu & Meihui Wang & Jianlin Shen & Xinliang Liu, 2023. "Topography, Soil Elemental Stoichiometry and Landscape Structure Determine the Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loadings of Agricultural Catchments in the Subtropics," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Sarah C. Sellars & Nathanael M. Thompson & Michael E. Wetzstein & Laura Bowling & Keith Cherkauer & Charlotte Lee & Jane Frankenberger & Ben Reinhart, 2022. "Does crop insurance inhibit climate change technology adoption?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Ping Li & Rebecca L. Muenich & Indrajeet Chaubey & Xiaomei Wei, 2019. "Evaluating Agricultural BMP Effectiveness in Improving Freshwater Provisioning Under Changing Climate," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 453-473, January.
    20. Iago Lowe Hale & Wilfred M. Wollheim & Richard G. Smith & Heidi Asbjornsen & André F. Brito & Kirk Broders & A. Stuart Grandy & Rebecca Rowe, 2014. "A Scale-Explicit Framework for Conceptualizing the Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Land Use Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:336:y:2016:i:c:p:26-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.