IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v326y2016icp23-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary trends in fish schools in heterogeneous environments

Author

Listed:
  • Reuter, Hauke
  • Kruse, Maren
  • Rovellini, Alberto
  • Breckling, Broder

Abstract

Individual-based modelling has contributed substantially to the understanding of fish schooling behaviour. Schooling is considered to grant several advantages, such as increased defense against predators and increased foraging success. Whereas the former has been well studied with empirical investigations and different modelling approaches, the latter has not received as much attention. Foraging success is considerably influenced by the emergent property of schools to locate and exploit heterogeneously distributed resources more efficiently than solitary fish. However, successful resource exploitation depends on individual fish properties as well as properties of the school in relation to patch size and spatial distribution of resources. Thus, schooling will be favourable in specific environmental conditions and less efficient in others.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuter, Hauke & Kruse, Maren & Rovellini, Alberto & Breckling, Broder, 2016. "Evolutionary trends in fish schools in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 23-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:326:y:2016:i:c:p:23-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015004172
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vabø, Rune & Skaret, Georg, 2008. "Emerging school structures and collective dynamics in spawning herring: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 125-140.
    2. Viscido, Steven V. & Parrish, Julia K. & Grünbaum, Daniel, 2007. "Factors influencing the structure and maintenance of fish schools," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 153-165.
    3. Sarah C. Stienessen & Julia K. Parrish, 2013. "The effect of disparate information on individual fish movements and emergent group behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1150-1160.
    4. Charlotte K. Hemelrijk & Hanspeter Kunz, 2005. "Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 178-187, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dkhili, Jamila & Berger, Uta & Idrissi Hassani, Lalla Mina & Ghaout, Saïd & Peters, Ronny & Piou, Cyril, 2017. "Self-organized spatial structures of locust groups emerging from local interaction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 26-40.
    2. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romey, William L. & Vidal, Jose M., 2013. "Sum of heterogeneous blind zones predict movements of simulated groups," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 9-15.
    2. William L Romey & Alicia R Lamb, 2015. "Flash Expansion Threshold in Whirligig Swarms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Barbaro, Alethea B.T. & Taylor, Kirk & Trethewey, Peterson F. & Youseff, Lamia & Birnir, Björn, 2009. "Discrete and continuous models of the dynamics of pelagic fish: Application to the capelin," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(12), pages 3397-3414.
    4. Giacomini, Henrique Corrêa & De Marco, Paulo & Petrere, Miguel, 2009. "Exploring community assembly through an individual-based model for trophic interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 23-39.
    5. Vabø, Rune & Skaret, Georg, 2008. "Emerging school structures and collective dynamics in spawning herring: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 125-140.
    6. Ye Yuan & Xuebo Chen & Qiubai Sun & Tianyun Huang, 2017. "Analysis of topological relationships and network properties in the interactions of human beings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Pascal P Klamser & Pawel Romanczuk, 2021. "Collective predator evasion: Putting the criticality hypothesis to the test," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Yilun Shang, 2015. "Group consensus of multi-agent systems in directed networks with noises and time delays," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 2481-2492, October.
    9. Dkhili, Jamila & Berger, Uta & Idrissi Hassani, Lalla Mina & Ghaout, Saïd & Peters, Ronny & Piou, Cyril, 2017. "Self-organized spatial structures of locust groups emerging from local interaction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 26-40.
    10. Niizato, Takayuki & Gunji, Yukio-Pegio, 2011. "Metric–topological interaction model of collective behavior," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3041-3049.
    11. Viscido, Steven V. & Parrish, Julia K. & Grünbaum, Daniel, 2007. "Factors influencing the structure and maintenance of fish schools," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 153-165.
    12. Beaudouin, Rémy & Monod, Gilles & Ginot, Vincent, 2008. "Selecting parameters for calibration via sensitivity analysis: An individual-based model of mosquitofish population dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 29-48.
    13. Wang, Xin & Liu, Shuo & Yu, Yifan & Yue, Shengzhi & Liu, Ying & Zhang, Fumin & Lin, Yuanshan, 2023. "Modeling collective motion for fish schooling via multi-agent reinforcement learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:326:y:2016:i:c:p:23-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.