IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v312y2015icp175-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing trophic structure of a subtropical bay as estimated from mass-balance food web model and stable isotope analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Jianguo
  • Cheung, William W.L.
  • Zheng, Xinqing
  • Chen, Bin
  • Liao, Jianji
  • Hu, Wenjia

Abstract

The trophic structure of a subtropical bay in Taiwan Strait was analyzed by using two methods: mass balance modeling (Ecopath) and stable isotopic analysis (SIA). Trophic levels (TLs) of main functional groups estimated from the two methods were compared. The Ecopath model was built based on the fishery resource survey in Xiamen Bay in 2009. Specifically, data on species composition, biomass, mortality rates, diet composition and fisheries catches were obtained from the survey in and around the bay. The model consisted of 26 functional groups, including plankton, benthos, fish, cephalopods, shrimps, crabs and marine mammals. TLs of the main functional groups were estimated to be between 2.89 (cephalopods) and 3.94 (congers), with an average of 3.11. Trophic transfer efficiencies from levels II to V were 12.8%, 19.2%, 19.7% and 12.1%, respectively. Catfish (Tachysurus sinensis and Netuma thalassina) and the fisheries have major trophic impacts on most functional groups in the Xiamen Bay ecosystem. Total system throughput was estimated to be 411tkm−2year−1. TLs derived from isotopic analysis were highly correlated with those estimated from Ecopath (Linear regression: R2=0.696, n=23, p<0.001). On an average, Ecopath underestimated TLs of the functional groups by about 12.2% compared to those estimated from SIA, with TLs from Ecopath being slightly higher at low TLs and lower at high TLs. This studies support value of using both stable isotopes and Ecopath methods to analyze this food web.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Jianguo & Cheung, William W.L. & Zheng, Xinqing & Chen, Bin & Liao, Jianji & Hu, Wenjia, 2015. "Comparing trophic structure of a subtropical bay as estimated from mass-balance food web model and stable isotope analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 175-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:312:y:2015:i:c:p:175-181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015002331
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deehr, Rebecca A. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Hart, Kevin J. & Clough, Lisa M. & Johnson, Beverly J. & Johnson, Jeffrey C., 2014. "Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Milessi, Andrés C. & Danilo, Calliari & Laura, Rodríguez-Graña & Daniel, Conde & Javier, Sellanes & Rodríguez-Gallego, Lorena, 2010. "Trophic mass-balance model of a subtropical coastal lagoon, including a comparison with a stable isotope analysis of the food-web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(24), pages 2859-2869.
    3. Dame, James K. & Christian, Robert R., 2008. "Evaluation of ecological network analysis: Validation of output," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 327-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    2. Deehr, Rebecca A. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Hart, Kevin J. & Clough, Lisa M. & Johnson, Beverly J. & Johnson, Jeffrey C., 2014. "Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Milessi, Andrés C. & Danilo, Calliari & Laura, Rodríguez-Graña & Daniel, Conde & Javier, Sellanes & Rodríguez-Gallego, Lorena, 2010. "Trophic mass-balance model of a subtropical coastal lagoon, including a comparison with a stable isotope analysis of the food-web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(24), pages 2859-2869.
    4. Gao, Yan & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Hao, Yan & Zhang, Yan & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2018. "Economy-pollution nexus model of cities at river basin scale based on multi-agent simulation: A conceptual framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 22-38.
    5. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    6. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Ecological network analysis of an industrial symbiosis system: A case study of the Shandong Lubei eco-industrial park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 174-184.
    7. Heymans, Johanna Jacomina & Coll, Marta & Link, Jason S. & Mackinson, Steven & Steenbeek, Jeroen & Walters, Carl & Christensen, Villy, 2016. "Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 173-184.
    8. Zhu, Xueting & Mu, Xianzhong & Hu, Guangwen, 2019. "Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 36-45.
    9. Link, Jason & Col, Laurel & Guida, Vincent & Dow, David & O’Reilly, John & Green, Jack & Overholtz, William & Palka, Debra & Legault, Chris & Vitaliano, Joseph & Griswold, Carolyn & Fogarty, Michael &, 2009. "Response of balanced network models to large-scale perturbation: Implications for evaluating the role of small pelagics in the Gulf of Maine," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 351-369.
    10. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2014. "Analysis of the energy metabolism of urban socioeconomic sectors and the associated carbon footprints: Model development and a case study for Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 540-551.
    11. Christian, Robert R. & Brinson, Mark M. & Dame, James K. & Johnson, Galen & Peterson, Charles H. & Baird, Daniel, 2009. "Ecological network analyses and their use for establishing reference domain in functional assessment of an estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3113-3122.
    12. Colléter, Mathieu & Gascuel, Didier & Ecoutin, Jean-Marc & Tito de Morais, Luis, 2012. "Modelling trophic flows in ecosystems to assess the efficiency of marine protected area (MPA), a case study on the coast of Sénégal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Zhang, Yan & Lu, Hanjing & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei, 2016. "Modelling urban nitrogen metabolic processes based on ecological network analysis: A case of study in Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 29-38.
    14. Chuang Tu & Xianzhong Mu & Yufeng Wu & Yifan Gu & Guangwen Hu, 2022. "Heterogenous impacts of components in urban energy metabolism: evidences from gravity model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10089-10117, August.
    15. Borrett, S.R. & Salas, A.K., 2010. "Evidence for resource homogenization in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(13), pages 1710-1716.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:312:y:2015:i:c:p:175-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.