IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v258y2013icp33-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migration and niche partitioning simultaneously increase species richness and rarity

Author

Listed:
  • Ai, Dexiecuo
  • Chu, Chengjin
  • Ellwood, M.D. Farnon
  • Hou, Rui
  • Wang, Gang

Abstract

To understand species abundance distributions effectively, it is essential to consider the forces which create the overwhelmingly long ‘tail’ of rare species. Both neutral and niche theory have been invoked to explain the rarity of certain species in ecological assemblages: niche theory stresses the importance of the resource division process, while neutral theory focuses on stochastic drift in densities of competitively identical species. Here, we show how migration and niche partitioning can act simultaneously to increase both the number of rare species and the total species richness. By simulating the dynamics of a metacommunity using an interconnected network of local communities, we incorporate niche partitioning into the otherwise per capita equivalent processes of birth and death. Niche partitioning is defined by the species niche fitness function, which is measured by the species optimal environmental conditions, the fundamental niche breadths of each species, and by the breadth of the environmental gradient of each local community. For a given niche breadth at the local community scale, unimodal relationships appear between the rate of migration, the number of rare species, and the total species richness. At the metacommunity scale, species richness was at first unaffected by increasing migration, but then crashed. At wide niche breadth, both the number of rare species and the total number of species started to decline at a low rate of migration. In contrast, when niche breadth was narrow, neither the number of rare species nor the total number of species started to decline until migration rates were much higher. This is because, for a given migration rate, niche breadth can affect the proportions of individuals coming from adjacent local communities. The integration of niche partitioning and migration therefore provides a rational explanation for the widespread rarity of species in ecological communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ai, Dexiecuo & Chu, Chengjin & Ellwood, M.D. Farnon & Hou, Rui & Wang, Gang, 2013. "Migration and niche partitioning simultaneously increase species richness and rarity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 33-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:258:y:2013:i:c:p:33-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001300149X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Volkov & Jayanth R. Banavar & Stephen P. Hubbell & Amos Maritan, 2007. "Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7166), pages 45-49, November.
    2. Anne E. Magurran & Peter A. Henderson, 2003. "Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6933), pages 714-716, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fung, Tak & Chisholm, Ryan A., 2023. "Improving the realism of neutral ecological models by incorporating transient dynamics with temporal changes in community size," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 12-26.
    2. Menezes, J. & Moura, B., 2022. "Pattern formation and coarsening dynamics in apparent competition models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Menezes, J. & Barbalho, R., 2023. "How multiple weak species jeopardise biodiversity in spatial rock–paper–scissors models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Emma Schwager & Himel Mallick & Steffen Ventz & Curtis Huttenhower, 2017. "A Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Lena Takayasu & Wataru Suda & Eiichiro Watanabe & Shinji Fukuda & Kageyasu Takanashi & Hiroshi Ohno & Misako Takayasu & Hideki Takayasu & Masahira Hattori, 2017. "A 3-dimensional mathematical model of microbial proliferation that generates the characteristic cumulative relative abundance distributions in gut microbiomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Claudia Sala & Enrico Giampieri & Silvia Vitali & Paolo Garagnani & Daniel Remondini & Armando Bazzani & Claudio Franceschi & Gastone C Castellani, 2020. "Gut microbiota ecology: Biodiversity estimated from hybrid neutral-niche model increases with health status and aging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Chen, Youhua, 2016. "Local speciation can be incorporated into neutral theory of biodiversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 67-70.
    8. Vilenkin, Boris & Chikatunov, Vladimir I. & Pavlíček, Tomáš, 2009. "The pattern of species turnover resulting from stochastic population dynamics: The model and field data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 657-661.
    9. Liao, Jinbao & Li, Zhenqing & Quets, Jan J. & Nijs, Ivan, 2013. "Effects of space partitioning in a plant species diversity model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 271-278.
    10. Tenorio, M. & Rangel, E. & Menezes, J., 2022. "Adaptive movement strategy in rock-paper-scissors models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Eliyajrj Kujur & Manoj Kumar Jhariya & Dhiraj Kumar Yadav & Arnab Banerjee, 2022. "Phytosociological attributes and regeneration potential of riparian vegetation in Northern Chhattisgarh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2861-2886, February.
    12. Omar Al Hammal & David Alonso & Rampal S Etienne & Stephen J Cornell, 2015. "When Can Species Abundance Data Reveal Non-neutrality?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Beeravolu, Champak R. & Couteron, Pierre & Pélissier, Raphaël & Munoz, François, 2009. "Studying ecological communities from a neutral standpoint: A review of models’ structure and parameter estimation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2603-2610.
    14. Gretchen J A Hansen & Cayelan C Carey, 2015. "Fish and Phytoplankton Exhibit Contrasting Temporal Species Abundance Patterns in a Dynamic North Temperate Lake," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto & Amoroso, Nicola & Monaco, Alfonso, 2020. "Estimating and comparing biodiversity with a single universal metric," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    16. Christopher R Stephens & Joaquín Giménez Heau & Camila González & Carlos N Ibarra-Cerdeña & Victor Sánchez-Cordero & Constantino González-Salazar, 2009. "Using Biotic Interaction Networks for Prediction in Biodiversity and Emerging Diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-9, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:258:y:2013:i:c:p:33-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.