IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i5p657-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pattern of species turnover resulting from stochastic population dynamics: The model and field data

Author

Listed:
  • Vilenkin, Boris
  • Chikatunov, Vladimir I.
  • Pavlíček, Tomáš

Abstract

The model of random population dynamics in a sampling site returns geometric distribution of longevities of continuous presence (=persistence) and Poisson distribution of the presence–absence transitions. This discrete-time stochastic process describes the presence–absence pattern observed in the beetles surveyed 6 years on Mount Carmel, Israel. Homogeneous pools of species mostly on the Families rank, exhibit the predicted by the model patterns. Conformity to an ergodic hypothesis is the criterion of ecological homogeneity. This criterion assumes the equivalence of short-term behavior of entire pool and long-term behavior of any species from this pool. The pool of all 801 species of Order Coleoptera does not match the model. Thus a taxon of an arbitrary rank may not be considered a priory as a unit of ecological study. Determined from field data parameters of the model are biased and magnitude of the bias depends on longevity of the survey. Parameter of distribution depends also on species tolerance, which is the level adaptation of given species to given environment in given time interval. Random process of species turnover may be considered as a game of species to gain their presence against deteriorative fluctuations of environmental conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilenkin, Boris & Chikatunov, Vladimir I. & Pavlíček, Tomáš, 2009. "The pattern of species turnover resulting from stochastic population dynamics: The model and field data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 657-661.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:5:p:657-661
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.12.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008005851
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.12.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brett A. Melbourne & Alan Hastings, 2008. "Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7200), pages 100-103, July.
    2. Anne E. Magurran & Peter A. Henderson, 2003. "Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6933), pages 714-716, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Méndez, Vicenç & Llopis, Isaac & Campos, Daniel & Horsthemke, Werner, 2010. "Extinction conditions for isolated populations affected by environmental stochasticity," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 250-256.
    2. Zhao, Yu & Yuan, Sanling, 2016. "Stability in distribution of a stochastic hybrid competitive Lotka–Volterra model with Lévy jumps," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 98-109.
    3. Anna Kuparinen & Robert B O'Hara & Juha Merilä, 2008. "Probabilistic Models for Continuous Ontogenetic Transition Processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-7, November.
    4. Eriksson, A. & Elías-Wolff, F. & Mehlig, B., 2013. "Metapopulation dynamics on the brink of extinction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 101-122.
    5. Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2020. "Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    6. Gledhill, Michelle & Van Kirk, Robert W., 2011. "Modeling effects of toxin exposure in fish on long-term population size, with an application to selenium toxicity in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(19), pages 3587-3597.
    7. Eleanor S Devenish-Nelson & Philip A Stephens & Stephen Harris & Carl Soulsbury & Shane A Richards, 2013. "Does Litter Size Variation Affect Models of Terrestrial Carnivore Extinction Risk and Management?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    8. Eliyajrj Kujur & Manoj Kumar Jhariya & Dhiraj Kumar Yadav & Arnab Banerjee, 2022. "Phytosociological attributes and regeneration potential of riparian vegetation in Northern Chhattisgarh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2861-2886, February.
    9. Izquierdo, Salvador & Dopazo, César & Fueyo, Norberto, 2010. "Supply-cost curves for geographically distributed renewable-energy resources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 667-672, January.
    10. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Possingham, Hugh P., 2012. "Interacting populations in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 96-105.
    11. Fung, Tak & Chisholm, Ryan A., 2023. "Improving the realism of neutral ecological models by incorporating transient dynamics with temporal changes in community size," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 12-26.
    12. Jacob LaRiviere & David Kling & James N Sanchirico & Charles Sims & Michael Springborn, 2018. "The Treatment of Uncertainty and Learning in the Economics of Natural Resource and Environmental Management," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 92-112.
    13. Emma Schwager & Himel Mallick & Steffen Ventz & Curtis Huttenhower, 2017. "A Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Liu, He & Dai, Chuanjun & Yu, Hengguo & Guo, Qing & Li, Jianbing & Hao, Aimin & Kikuchi, Jun & Zhao, Min, 2023. "Dynamics of a stochastic non-autonomous phytoplankton–zooplankton system involving toxin-producing phytoplankton and impulsive perturbations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 368-386.
    15. Ponciano, José M. & Taper, Mark L. & Dennis, Brian, 2018. "Ecological change points: The strength of density dependence and the loss of history," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 45-59.
    16. Donovan, Pierce & Springborn, Michael, 2022. "Balancing conservation and commerce: A shadow value viability approach for governing bycatch," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Kai Ma & Yueyue Li & Wen Song & Jiayin Zhou & Xia Liu & Mengqi Wang & Xiaofan Gong & Linlin Wang & Qichao Tu, 2024. "Disentangling drivers of mudflat intertidal DOM chemodiversity using ecological models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Gretchen J A Hansen & Cayelan C Carey, 2015. "Fish and Phytoplankton Exhibit Contrasting Temporal Species Abundance Patterns in a Dynamic North Temperate Lake," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Chen, Aimin & Wang, Pei & Zhou, Tianshou & Tian, Tianhai, 2022. "Balance of positive and negative regulation for trade-off between efficiency and resilience of high-dimensional networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    20. Erickson, Richard A. & Cox, Stephen B. & Oates, Jessica L. & Anderson, Todd A. & Salice, Christopher J. & Long, Kevin R., 2014. "A Daphnia population model that considers pesticide exposure and demographic stochasticity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 37-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:5:p:657-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.