IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v247y2012icp58-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the suitability of a generic fungal infection model for pest risk assessment studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bregaglio, Simone
  • Cappelli, Giovanni
  • Donatelli, Marcello

Abstract

Pest risk assessment studies are aimed at evaluating if weather conditions are suitable for the potential entry and establishment of an organism in a new environment. For fungal plant pathogens, the crucial aspect to be explored is the fulfillment of the infection process, that constitutes the first phase of the development of an epidemic as mainly driven by temperature and leaf wetness duration. This is of particular interest for climate change studies, because the modified pattern of temperature and moisture regimes could completely alter the known distribution and severity of plant disease epidemics. Biophysical process-based models could effectively be used in such studies, because they allow, within their applicability range, estimating organisms responses to climatic drivers in environmental conditions not yet experienced. One of the prerequisite of their adoption in operational contexts is a sensitivity analysis assessment aimed at understanding their ability (i) to differentiate the responses according to different parameterizations and (ii) to be sensitive to the variability of the input data. In this study, a generic potential fungal infection model simulating four pathogens chosen to provide a wide range in temperature and moisture requirements was analyzed. The model was run under diverse climatic conditions. The sensitivity of the model significantly changed according to the pathogen tested, and the relevance of its parameters in explaining model output resulted strongly linked to the environmental conditions tested, indicating its to be used in pest risk assessment studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bregaglio, Simone & Cappelli, Giovanni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2012. "Evaluating the suitability of a generic fungal infection model for pest risk assessment studies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 58-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:247:y:2012:i:c:p:58-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012004012
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark C. Andersen & Heather Adams & Bruce Hope & Mark Powell, 2004. "Risk Assessment for Invasive Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 787-793, August.
    2. Cariboni, J. & Gatelli, D. & Liska, R. & Saltelli, A., 2007. "The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 167-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Viswanath & P. Sinha & S. Naresh Kumar & Taru Sharma & Shalini Saxena & Shweta Panjwani & H. Pathak & Shalu Mishra Shukla, 2017. "Simulation of leaf blast infection in tropical rice agro-ecology under climate change scenario," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 155-167, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank H. Koch & Denys Yemshanov & Daniel W. McKenney & William D. Smith, 2009. "Evaluating Critical Uncertainty Thresholds in a Spatial Model of Forest Pest Invasion Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1227-1241, September.
    2. Imron, Muhammad Ali & Gergs, Andre & Berger, Uta, 2012. "Structure and sensitivity analysis of individual-based predator–prey models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 71-81.
    3. Chu-Agor, M.L. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Kiker, G.A. & Aiello-Lammens, M.E. & Akçakaya, H.R. & Convertino, M. & Linkov, I., 2012. "Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 33-47.
    4. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    5. Cameron G. Nay & Mark W. Brunson, 2013. "A War of Words: Do Conflict Metaphors Affect Beliefs about Managing “Unwanted” Plants?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Lola Gilbert & Tiphaine Jeanniard-du-Dot & Matthieu Authier & Tiphaine Chouvelon & Jérôme Spitz, 2023. "Composition of cetacean communities worldwide shapes their contribution to ocean nutrient cycling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Julien CALAS & Antoine GODIN & Julie MAURIN (AFD) & and Etienne ESPAGNE (World Bank), 2022. "Global biodiversity scenarios: what do they tell us for biodiversity-related socioeconomic impacts?," Working Paper 1a39419b-ef1d-4b82-a7be-d, Agence française de développement.
    8. Wu, Qiong-Li & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Mathieu, Amélie, 2012. "An efficient computational method for global sensitivity analysis and its application to tree growth modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 35-43.
    9. Song, Xiaodong & Bryan, Brett A. & Almeida, Auro C. & Paul, Keryn I. & Zhao, Gang & Ren, Yin, 2013. "Time-dependent sensitivity of a process-based ecological model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 114-123.
    10. Link, Jason S. & Pranovi, Fabio & Libralato, Simone, 2022. "Simulations and interpretations of cumulative trophic theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    11. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    12. Pal, Saheb & Ghosh, Indrajit, 2023. "Dynamics of a coupled socio-environmental model: An application to global CO2 emissions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    13. Amir Mokhtari & Jane M. Van Doren, 2019. "An Agent‐Based Model for Pathogen Persistence and Cross‐Contamination Dynamics in a Food Facility," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 992-1021, May.
    14. Dueri, Sibylle & Faugeras, Blaise & Maury, Olivier, 2012. "Modelling the skipjack tuna dynamics in the Indian Ocean with APECOSM-E – Part 2: Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 55-64.
    15. Vinatier, Fabrice & Tixier, Philippe & Le Page, Christophe & Duyck, Pierre-François & Lescourret, Françoise, 2009. "COSMOS, a spatially explicit model to simulate the epidemiology of Cosmopolites sordidus in banana fields," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(18), pages 2244-2254.
    16. Huber, Nica & Bugmann, Harald & Lafond, Valentine, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis of a dynamic vegetation model: Model sensitivity depends on successional time, climate and competitive interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 377-390.
    17. Baey, Charlotte & Didier, Anne & Lemaire, Sébastien & Maupas, Fabienne & Cournède, Paul-Henry, 2014. "Parametrization of five classical plant growth models applied to sugar beet and comparison of their predictive capacity on root yield and total biomass," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 11-20.
    18. Gilardelli, Carlo & Confalonieri, Roberto & Cappelli, Giovanni Alessandro & Bellocchi, Gianni, 2018. "Sensitivity of WOFOST-based modelling solutions to crop parameters under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Priyadarshi, Anupam & Chandra, Ram & Kishi, Michio J. & Smith, S.Lan & Yamazaki, Hidekatsu, 2022. "Understanding plankton ecosystem dynamics under realistic micro-scale variability requires modeling at least three trophic levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    20. Cadero, A. & Aubry, A. & Brun, F. & Dourmad, J.Y. & Salaün, Y. & Garcia-Launay, F., 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis of a pig fattening unit model simulating technico-economic performance and environmental impacts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 221-229.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:247:y:2012:i:c:p:58-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.