IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v244y2012icp13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A diffusive logistic growth model to describe forest recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Acevedo, Miguel A.
  • Marcano, Mariano
  • Fletcher, Robert J.

Abstract

Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) has broad implications for biodiversity, climate and ecosystem services. Even though LUCC often focuses on forest fragmentation, forest recovery is another form of LUCC that is becoming increasingly common. Understanding the process of forest recovery is a conservation and management priority; however, it is a difficult process to understand given the large number of factors that interact in a complex spatio-temporal setting. Reaction diffusion models provide an appropriate framework to study the complex dynamics of forest recovery because they account for both spatial structure and the dynamics of land-cover classes. Here, we describe a diffusive logistic growth (DLG) model to quantify forest recovery. We define a system in which forest diffuses through a non-forest matrix. The model consists of a diffusion term that describes the spread of forest in continuous space and time, and a logistic growth reaction that describes change in the proportion of forest. To illustrate model parameterization, we used the DLG approach to describe forest recovery in Puerto Rico from 1951 to 1991–1992. The model showed that forest recovery in Puerto Rico was explained by a positive intrinsic growth rate of forest and relatively slow diffusion. This mechanistic modeling approach presents a novel way to study forest recovery in continuous space and time while accounting for spatial dependency.

Suggested Citation

  • Acevedo, Miguel A. & Marcano, Mariano & Fletcher, Robert J., 2012. "A diffusive logistic growth model to describe forest recovery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 13-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:244:y:2012:i:c:p:13-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012003390
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K C Clarke & S Hoppen & L Gaydos, 1997. "A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(2), pages 247-261, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Safarzynska, Karolina, 2020. "Collective punishment promotes resource conservation if it is not enforced," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Bonneau, Mathieu & Johnson, Fred A. & Romagosa, Christina M., 2016. "Spatially explicit control of invasive species using a reaction–diffusion model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 15-24.
    3. Casabán, M.-C. & Company, R. & Egorova, V.N. & Jódar, L., 2024. "A random free-boundary diffusive logistic differential model: Numerical analysis, computing and simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 55-78.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Dongya & Zheng, Xinqi & Zhang, Chunxiao & Wang, Hongbin, 2017. "A new temporal–spatial dynamics method of simulating land-use change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 1-10.
    2. A’kif AL-FUGARA & Abdel Rahman AL-SHABEEB & Yahya AL-SHAWABKEH & Hani AL-AMOUSH & Rida AL-ADAMAT, 2018. "Simulation And Prediction Of Urban Spatial Expansion In Highly Vibrant Cities Using The Sleuth Model: A Case Study Of Amman Metropolitan, Jordan," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 37-56, February.
    3. Xiaoli Hu & Xin Li & Ling Lu, 2018. "Modeling the Land Use Change in an Arid Oasis Constrained by Water Resources and Environmental Policy Change Using Cellular Automata Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Jaekyung Lee & Galen Newman & Yunmi Park, 2018. "A Comparison of Vacancy Dynamics between Growing and Shrinking Cities Using the Land Transformation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Wickramasuriya, Rohan Chandralal & Bregt, Arnold K. & van Delden, Hedwig & Hagen-Zanker, Alex, 2009. "The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(18), pages 2302-2309.
    6. Ismail Ercument Ayazli, 2019. "Monitoring of Urban Growth with Improved Model Accuracy by Statistical Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Yishao Shi & Jie Wu & Shouzheng Shi, 2017. "Study of the Simulated Expansion Boundary of Construction Land in Shanghai Based on a SLEUTH Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Zhuohang Xin & Chao Li & Haixing Liu & Hua Shang & Lei Ye & Yu Li & Chi Zhang, 2018. "Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Ecosystem Services in Dalian, China: Implications for Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Tewodros Assefa Nigussie & Abdusselam Altunkaynak, 2019. "Modeling the effect of urbanization on flood risk in Ayamama Watershed, Istanbul, Turkey, using the MIKE 21 FM model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1031-1047, November.
    10. Neda Ghasemkhani & Saeideh Sahebi Vayghan & Arnick Abdollahi & Biswajeet Pradhan & Abdullah Alamri, 2020. "Urban Development Modeling Using Integrated Fuzzy Systems, Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA), and Geospatial Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Chuanzhun Sun & Chao Sun & Zhenshan Yang & Jikang Zhang & Yu Deng, 2016. "Urban Land Development for Industrial and Commercial Use: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Liu, Xiaoping & Li, Xia & Shi, Xun & Wu, Shaokun & Liu, Tao, 2008. "Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 169-181.
    13. Ali Alghamdi & Anthony R. Cummings, 2019. "Assessing Riyadh’s Urban Change Utilizing High-Resolution Imagery," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Miguel Amado & Francesca Poggi & António Ribeiro Amado & Sílvia Breu, 2017. "A Cellular Approach to Net-Zero Energy Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Ruci Wang & Hao Hou & Yuji Murayama, 2018. "Scenario-Based Simulation of Tianjin City Using a Cellular Automata–Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Cong Cao & Suzana Dragićević & Songnian Li, 2019. "Short-Term Forecasting of Land Use Change Using Recurrent Neural Network Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Yilun Liu & Yueming Hu & Shaoqiu Long & Luo Liu & Xiaoping Liu, 2017. "Analysis of the Effectiveness of Urban Land-Use-Change Models Based on the Measurement of Spatio-Temporal, Dynamic Urban Growth: A Cellular Automata Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Ye Zhou & Feng Zhang & Zhenhong Du & Xinyue Ye & Renyi Liu, 2017. "Integrating Cellular Automata with the Deep Belief Network for Simulating Urban Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Brian Pickard & Joshua Gray & Ross Meentemeyer, 2017. "Comparing Quantity, Allocation and Configuration Accuracy of Multiple Land Change Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:244:y:2012:i:c:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.