IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v208y2007i2p342-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedodiversity, connectance and spatial variability of soil properties, what is the relationship?

Author

Listed:
  • Saldaña, A.
  • Ibáñez, J.J.

Abstract

The concept of diversity and its measurement is becoming increasingly attractive to soil scientists. This theme is explored using a terrace chronosequence in the Henares River valley, NE Madrid. Pedodiversity was computed at different hierarchical levels (Great Group, Subgroup and family of Soil Taxonomy) using appropriate indices including abundance and the Shannon diversity index. Taxonomic pedodiversity, i.e., the diversity of soil types, increased with time (from low to high terraces) at high hierarchical levels but no clear relationship was found at family level. Richness–area analysis showed that a logarithmic function fitted data from the low and middle terraces, while the high terrace data could be fitted with a power model. The geostatistical analysis revealed a decrease in the variability of soil properties from young to old deposits. This study showed that, at the Henares site, diversity and spatial variability of soil properties are not synonymous concepts. Indeed, the terrace with the highest taxonomic pedodiversity at Great Group and Subgroup levels, showed a low spatial variability of soil properties. Also, the same terrace exhibited the lowest connectance values. A non-linear dynamical system approach can be useful to explain these apparently contradictory results.

Suggested Citation

  • Saldaña, A. & Ibáñez, J.J., 2007. "Pedodiversity, connectance and spatial variability of soil properties, what is the relationship?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 342-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:208:y:2007:i:2:p:342-352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380007003134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Ying & Peth, Stephan & Krümmelbein, Julia & Horn, Rainer & Wang, Zhongyan & Steffens, Markus & Hoffmann, Carsten & Peng, Xinhua, 2007. "Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 241-254.
    2. Grunwald, S. & Reddy, K.R. & Prenger, J.P. & Fisher, M.M., 2007. "Modeling of the spatial variability of biogeochemical soil properties in a freshwater ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 521-535.
    3. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuhui & Zhou, Guangsheng & Jia, Bingrui, 2008. "Modeling SOC and NPP responses of meadow steppe to different grazing intensities in Northeast China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 72-78.
    2. Santos, Mário & Bastos, Rita & Cabral, João Alexandre, 2013. "Converting conventional ecological datasets in dynamic and dynamic spatially explicit simulations: Current advances and future applications of the Stochastic Dynamic Methodology (StDM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 91-100.
    3. Lorena Cadavid & Luisa Díez-Echavarría & Alejandro Valencia, 2017. "Spin-Off Activities At Higher Educational Institutions: Performance Implications From A Modeling Perspective," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Christian Dupraz & Kevin J. Wolz & Isabelle Lecomte & Grégoire Talbot & Grégoire Vincent & Rachmat Mulia & François Bussière & Harry Ozier-Lafontaine & Sitraka Andrianarisoa & Nick Jackson & Gerry Law, 2019. "Hi-sAFe: A 3D Agroforestry Model for Integrating Dynamic Tree–Crop Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Chen, Jun & Shiyomi, Masae & Morita, Satoru, 2023. "Phytomass productivity of cutting and grazing grasslands with special reference to small-scale spatial variation in plant nutrient resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    6. Bourennane, H. & King, D. & Couturier, A. & Nicoullaud, B. & Mary, B. & Richard, G., 2007. "Uncertainty assessment of soil water content spatial patterns using geostatistical simulations: An empirical comparison of a simulation accounting for single attribute and a simulation accounting for ," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 323-335.
    7. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    8. Ginzburg, Lev R. & Jensen, Christopher X.J. & Yule, Jeffrey V., 2007. "Aiming the “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” at ecological theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 356-362.
    9. Smajgl, Alex & House, Alan P.N. & Butler, James R.A., 2011. "Implications of ecological data constraints for integrated policy and livelihoods modelling: An example from East Kalimantan, Indonesia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 888-896.
    10. Ives, M.C. & Scandol, J.P. & Greenville, J., 2013. "A bio-economic management strategy evaluation for a multi-species, multi-fleet fishery facing a world of uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 69-84.
    11. Conner, Mary M. & Ebinger, Michael R. & Knowlton, Frederick F., 2008. "Evaluating coyote management strategies using a spatially explicit, individual-based, socially structured population model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 234-247.
    12. Igor Lugo & Gustavo Martínez-Mekler, 2022. "Theoretical study of the effect of ports in the formation of city systems," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Bartsev, Sergey I. & Degermendzhi, Andrey G. & Erokhin, Dmitry V., 2008. "Principle of the worst scenario in the modelling past and future of biosphere dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 160-171.
    14. Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed & Lulu Hou & Ruirui Yan & Xiaoping Xin & Yousif Mohamed Zainelabdeen, 2020. "The Joint Effect of Grazing Intensity and Soil Factors on Aboveground Net Primary Production in Hulunber Grasslands Meadow Steppe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Moret-Fernández, D. & Pueyo, Y. & Bueno, C.G. & Alados, C.L., 2011. "Hydro-physical responses of gypseous and non-gypseous soils to livestock grazing in a semi-arid region of NE Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(12), pages 1822-1827, October.
    16. Lin, Jian-Hao & Quan, Yu-Juan & Han, Bo-Ping, 2024. "MetaIBM: A Python-based library for individual-based modelling of eco-evolutionary dynamics in spatial-explicit metacommunities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    17. Luedeling, Eike & Smethurst, Philip J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Bayala, Jules & Huth, Neil I. & van Noordwijk, Meine & Ong, Chin K. & Mulia, Rachmat & Lusiana, Betha & Muthuri, Catherine & Sinclair, Ferg, 2016. "Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 51-69.
    18. Liliana Perez & Suzana Dragicevic & Jonathan Gaudreau, 2019. "A geospatial agent-based model of the spatial urban dynamics of immigrant population: A study of the island of Montreal, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Augusiak, Jacqueline & Van den Brink, Paul J. & Grimm, Volker, 2014. "Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 280(C), pages 117-128.
    20. Jiao Chen & Haiping Tang, 2016. "Effect of Grazing Exclusion on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Organic Carbon of Leymus chinensis Grassland in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:208:y:2007:i:2:p:342-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.