IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v233y2023ics0165176523004019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of relative wealth concerns on wealth gap and welfare in a noisy rational expectations economy

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Huichao
  • Lou, Youcheng

Abstract

We employ a noisy rational expectations equilibrium model to investigate the influence of relative wealth concerns on wealth gap and welfare. Our analysis reveals that the impact is sensitive to the exogeneity or endogeneity of information. When information is exogenous, the average wealth gap between high-precision and low-precision investors is either decreasing or, initially decreases and eventually increases in the degree of relative wealth concerns. Moreover, we identify two or three potential patterns regarding the monotonicity pattern of the welfare of low-precision and high-precision investors. However, when information becomes endogenous, the average wealth gap and welfare decrease.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Huichao & Lou, Youcheng, 2023. "The impact of relative wealth concerns on wealth gap and welfare in a noisy rational expectations economy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:233:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523004019
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176523004019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verrecchia, Robert E, 1982. "Information Acquisition in a Noisy Rational Expectations Economy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1415-1430, November.
    2. Matthijs Breugem & Adrian Buss, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Information Acquisition: Implications for Asset Prices and Informational Efficiency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(6), pages 2260-2301.
    3. Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
    4. Admati, Anat R & Pfleiderer, Paul, 1997. "Does It All Add Up? Benchmarks and the Compensation of Active Portfolio Managers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(3), pages 323-350, July.
    5. Qiu, Zhigang, 2017. "Equilibrium-Informed Trading with Relative Performance Measurement," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(5), pages 2083-2118, October.
    6. Bengtsson, Erik & Waldenström, Daniel, 2018. "Capital Shares and Income Inequality: Evidence from the Long Run," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 78(3), pages 712-743, September.
    7. Hellwig, Martin F., 1980. "On the aggregation of information in competitive markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 477-498, June.
    8. Diego García & Günter Strobl, 2011. "Relative Wealth Concerns and Complementarities in Information Acquisition," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 169-207.
    9. Kurlat, Pablo & Veldkamp, Laura, 2015. "Should we regulate financial information?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PB), pages 697-720.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthijs Breugem & Adrian Buss, 2017. "Institutional Investors and Information Acquisition: Implications for Asset Prices and Informational Efficiency," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 524, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    2. Georgy Chabakauri & Kathy Yuan & Konstantinos E Zachariadis, 2022. "Multi-asset Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium with Contingent Claims," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(5), pages 2445-2490.
    3. Bing Han & Liyan Yang, 2013. "Social Networks, Information Acquisition, and Asset Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1444-1457, June.
    4. Buss, Adrian & Sundaresan, Savitar, 2020. "More Risk, More Information: How Passive Ownership Can Improve Informational Efficiency," CEPR Discussion Papers 14843, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Rahi, Rohit & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Information acquisition, price informativeness, and welfare," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 558-593.
    6. George-Marios Angeletos & Chen Lian, 2016. "Incomplete Information in Macroeconomics: Accommodating Frictions in Coordination," NBER Working Papers 22297, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Michael Sockin & Mindy Z Xiaolan, 2023. "Delegated Learning and Contract Commonality in Asset Management," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(6), pages 1931-1975.
    8. Larson, Nathan, 2011. "Clustering on the same news sources in an asset market," MPRA Paper 32823, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Avdis, Efstathios, 2016. "Information tradeoffs in dynamic financial markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 568-584.
    10. García, Diego & Vanden, Joel M., 2009. "Information acquisition and mutual funds," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(5), pages 1965-1995, September.
    11. Rahi, Rohit & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Information acquisition, price informativeness and welfare," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118935, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Chen, Yong & Kelly, Bryan & Wu, Wei, 2020. "Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 316-341.
    13. Li, Frank Weikai & Sun, Chengzhu, 2022. "Information acquisition and expected returns: Evidence from EDGAR search traffic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Diego García & Francesco Sangiorgi & Branko Urošević, 2007. "Overconfidence and Market Efficiency with Heterogeneous Agents," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 30(2), pages 313-336, February.
    15. Antonio Gargano & Alberto G. Rossi & Russ Wermers, 2017. "The Freedom of Information Act and the Race Toward Information Acquisition," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(6), pages 2179-2228.
    16. Martin Hellwig, 2005. "Market Discipline, Information Processing, and Corporate Governance," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2005_19, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    17. Juan Dubra & Helios Herrera, 2002. "Market Participation, Information and Volatility," Working Papers 0206, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
    18. Jordi Mondria & Xavier Vives & Liyan Yang, 2022. "Costly Interpretation of Asset Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 52-74, January.
    19. Huang, Shiyang & Qiu, Zhigang & Yang, Liyan, 2020. "Institutionalization, delegation, and asset prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. David Russ, 2020. "Multidimensional Noise and Non-Fundamental Information Diversity," Working Papers 201, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Relative wealth concerns; Wealth gap; Welfare; Noisy rational expectations equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:233:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523004019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.