IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v196y2020ics0165176520303463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correcting for bias using multidimensional measures of Socially Desirable Response

Author

Listed:
  • Meyer, Stefan
  • Santos, Paulo

Abstract

We use multidimensional measures of socially desirable response (SDR) to reduce the bias introduced by respondents’ need for approval from interviewer (Impression Management — IM) or to perceive oneself favorably (Self-Deceptive Enhancement — SDE). Using data from a field experiment, we show that (1) SDE explains misreporting of compliance status, (2) controlling for SDE effectively eliminates the bias resulting from using wrongly reported compliance and (3) controlling for IM does not correct for the bias introduced by SDR.

Suggested Citation

  • Meyer, Stefan & Santos, Paulo, 2020. "Correcting for bias using multidimensional measures of Socially Desirable Response," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520303463
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176520303463
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire M. Hart & Timothy D. Ritchie & Erica G. Hepper & Jochen E. Gebauer, 2015. "The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16)," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. An Huang & Paulo Santos, 2022. "Improving the reliability and validity of data on Big Five personality traits in developing countries," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-04, Monash University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Sheedy & Patrick Garcia & Denise Jepsen, 2021. "The Role of Risk Climate and Ethical Self-interest Climate in Predicting Unethical Pro-organisational Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 281-300, October.
    2. Bastos, Wilson, 2020. "“Speaking of Purchases”: How Conversational Potential Determines Consumers' Willingness to Exert Effort for Experiential Versus Material Purchases," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Kauder, Björn & Potrafke, Niklas & Ursprung, Heinrich, 2018. "Behavioral determinants of proclaimed support for environment protection policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 26-41.
    4. Tancredi Pascucci & Giuseppina Maria Cardella & Brizeida Hernàndez-Sànchez & Jose Carlos Sànchez-Garcìa, 2022. "Environmental Sensitivity to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Petr Houdek & Štěpán Bahník & Marek Hudík & Marek Vranka, 2021. "Selection effects on dishonest behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 238-266, March.
    6. Mobasseri, Sanaz & Stein, Daniel H. & Carney, Dana R., 2022. "The accurate judgment of social network characteristics in the lab and field using thin slices of the behavioral stream," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:238-266 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Arne Weigold & Ingrid K. Weigold & Migyeong Jang & Emily M. Thornton, 2022. "College students’ and Mechanical Turk workers’ environmental factors while completing online surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2589-2612, August.
    9. Stephen T. Homer, 2022. "Perceived corporate citizenship: a scale development and validation study adopting a bottom-up approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1435-1461, June.
    10. Robinson, Michael D. & Irvin, Roberta L. & Pringle, Todd A. & Klein, Robert J., 2023. "General cognitive ability, as assessed by self-reported ACT scores, is associated with reduced emotional responding: Evidence from a Dynamic Affect Reactivity Task," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Shiva Taghavi & Michael Segalla, 2023. "Is Work an Act of Worship? The Impact of Implicit Religious Beliefs on Work Ethic in Secular vs. Religious Cultures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 509-531, December.
    12. Yuting Sun & Chaoyun Liang, 2022. "Urban–Rural Comparison of the Association between Unsupportive Relationships, Perceived Stress, Authentic Self-Presentation, and Loneliness among Young Adults in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    13. An Huang & Paulo Santos, 2022. "Improving the reliability and validity of data on Big Five personality traits in developing countries," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-04, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    14. Ozuna, Edna & Steinhoff, Lena, 2024. "“Look me in the eye, customer”: How do face-to-face interactions in peer-to-peer sharing economy services affect customers’ misbehavior concealment intentions?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Stephen T. Homer & Koon Vui Yee & Kuan Siew Khor, 2023. "Developing a measurement instrument for perceived Corporate citizenship using multi-stakeholder, multi-industry and cross-country validations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 277-300, February.
    16. Josephat Paul Nkaizirwa & Catherine Musalagani Aurah & Florien Nsanganwimana, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes as the Correlates of Environmental Identity among Pre-Service Biology Teachers in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Susan Clayton & Sandor Czellar & Sonya Nartova-Bochaver & Jeffrey C. Skibins & Gabby Salazar & Yu-Chi Tseng & Boris Irkhin & Fredy S. Monge-Rodriguez, 2021. "Cross-Cultural Validation of A Revised Environmental Identity Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Alain Cohn & Jan Stoop & Hatim A. Rahman, 2022. "Disinformation for Hire: Examining the Production of False COVID-19 Information," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-086/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Kray, Laura J. & Kennedy, Jessica A. & Rosenblum, Michael, 2022. "Who do they think they are?: A social-cognitive account of gender differences in social sexual identity and behavior at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Corey Petsnik & Jacquie D Vorauer, 2020. "Do dominant group members have different emotional responses to observing dominant-on-dominant versus dominant-on-disadvantaged ostracism? Some evidence for heightened reactivity to potentially discri," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Socially Desirable Response; Impression management; Self-deceptive enhancement; Field experiment; Compliance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520303463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.