IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v60y2006i1p14-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A preference for an aggregate measure: A reply to Sagoff

Author

Listed:
  • Zerbe, Richard Jr.
  • Bauman, Yoram
  • Finkle, Aaron

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zerbe, Richard Jr. & Bauman, Yoram & Finkle, Aaron, 2006. "A preference for an aggregate measure: A reply to Sagoff," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 14-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:60:y:2006:i:1:p:14-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(05)00585-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard O. Zerbe, 2001. "Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1992.
    2. Posner, Richard A, 2000. "Cost-Benefit Analysis: Definition, Justification, and Comment on Conference Papers," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(2), pages 1153-1177, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:sae:envval:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:239-257 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Engel, 2006. "The Difficult Reception of Rigorous Descriptive Social Science in the Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_1, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    2. Irena Antošová & Jana Stávková, 2019. "Application of the Institute of Income Redistribution in the Form of Social Transfers in EU Countries," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 161-172, June.
    3. Alain Marciano, 2018. "Posner, Richard," Post-Print hal-02306799, HAL.
    4. Jack L. Knetsch, 2005. "The Appropriate Choice Of Valuation Measure In Usual Cases Of Losses Valued More Than Gains," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 50(spec0), pages 393-406.
    5. Clay, Karen & Wright, Gavin, 2005. "Order without law? Property rights during the California gold rush," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 155-183, April.
    6. Knetsch, Jack L., 2007. "Biased valuations, damage assessments, and policy choices: The choice of measure matters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 684-689, September.
    7. Richard Zerbe, 2004. "Should moral sentiments be incorporated into benefit-cost analysis? An example of long-term discounting," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 37(3), pages 305-318, December.
    8. Marggraf, Rainer & Masius, Patrick & Rumpf, Christine, 2012. "Zur Integration von Tieren in wohlfahrtsökonomische Analysen," DARE Discussion Papers 1207, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    9. bleischwitz, raimund & fuhrmann, katrin & huchler, elias, 2007. "The Sustainability Impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on the European Industry," MPRA Paper 14519, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2007.
    10. Yang, Jingjing & Ryan, Chris & Zhang, Lingyun, 2013. "Social conflict in communities impacted by tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 82-93.
    11. Knetsch Jack L. & Riyanto Yohanes E. & Zong Jichuan, 2012. "Gain and Loss Domains and the Choice of Welfare Measure of Positive and Negative Changes," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(4), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Oleg Sukharev, 2012. "The Neoinstitutional Contracts Theory: New Perspectives," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(1), pages 87-118.
    13. Török, Ádám, 2007. "A versenyképesség egyes jogi és szabályozási feltételei Magyarországon [Legal and regulatory conditions for competitiveness in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1066-1084.
    14. Jankovic Ivan & Block Walter, 2019. "Private Property Rights, Government Interventionism and Welfare Economics," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(4), pages 365-397, December.
    15. Schmitz Andrew & Zerbe Richard O., 2008. "Scitovsky Reversals and Efficiency Criteria in Policy Analysis," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Farrow Scott & Larson Douglas M., 2012. "News and Social Cost: The Case of Oil Spills and Distant Viewers," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Kiet T. Nguyen & Jack L. Knetsch & Phumsith Mahasuweerachai, 2021. "WTP or WTA: A Means of Determining the Appropriate Welfare Measure of Positive and Negative Changes When Preferences are Reference Dependent," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(4), pages 615-633, April.
    18. Jack L. Knetsch, 2013. "Values of gains and losses: reference states and choice of measure," Chapters, in: John A. List & Michael K. Price (ed.), Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment, chapter 5, pages 157-170, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Mark White, 2006. "A Kantian critique of neoclassical law and economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 235-252.
    20. Sankalp Sharma & Anil Giri & Tajamul Haque & Iuliia Tetteh, 2018. "Land Acquisition in India: A Pareto and Kaldor-Hicks Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:60:y:2006:i:1:p:14-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.