IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v224y2024ics0921800924001575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy management of the Italian small pelagic fishery in the Adriatic Sea: A dynamic maximum economic yield approach

Author

Listed:
  • Natali, F.
  • Toraldo, G.
  • Giannino, F.
  • Cicia, G.
  • Branca, G.

Abstract

The sustainability of most Mediterranean fisheries is heavily compromised, suggesting the need for an effective policy response to preserve both profitability of fleets and fish stocks in the long run. This study focuses on the Italian small pelagic fleet in the Adriatic Sea. More specifically, we focus on anchovies and sardines' stocks, which account for most of the total catches in the area in terms of landed weight. We build an optimization model aimed at estimating the discounted Maximum Economic Yield (MEY) of this fishery under selected policy scenarios ranging from effort limitations to total allowable catch (TAC) management. The model allows us to compare the bioeconomic performances of the fishery over a time span of 10 years. The results outline a trade-off between biological and economic policy targets, as well as an efficiency gap among fishing gears. This gap ultimately leads to an uneven distribution of economic benefits under restrictive policy scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Natali, F. & Toraldo, G. & Giannino, F. & Cicia, G. & Branca, G., 2024. "Policy management of the Italian small pelagic fishery in the Adriatic Sea: A dynamic maximum economic yield approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001575
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001575
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chu, Long & Grafton, R. Quentin & Kompas, Tom, 2022. "Optimisation of economic performance and stock resilience in marine capture fisheries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 863-875.
    2. Cuilleret, Mathieu & Doyen, Luc & Gomes, Hélène & Blanchard, Fabian, 2022. "Resilience management for coastal fisheries facing with global changes and uncertainties," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 634-656.
    3. Diop, Bassirou & Sanz, Nicolas & Duplan, Yves Jamont Junior & Guene, El Hadji Mama & Blanchard, Fabian & Pereau, Jean-Christophe & Doyen, Luc, 2018. "Maximum Economic Yield Fishery Management in the Face of Global Warming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 52-61.
    4. Lagarde, A. & Doyen, L. & Ahad-Cissé, A. & Caill-Milly, N. & Gourguet, S. & Pape, O. Le & Macher, C. & Morandeau, G. & Thébaud, O., 2018. "How Does MMEY Mitigate the Bioeconomic Effects of Climate Change for Mixed Fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 317-332.
    5. Dale Squires & Niels Vestergaard, 2016. "Putting Economics into Maximum Economic Yield," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 101-116.
    6. Newey, Whitney & West, Kenneth, 2014. "A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 33(1), pages 125-132.
    7. Kompas, Tom & Dichmont, Cathy M. & Punt, Andre E. & Deng, A. & Che, Tuong Nhu & Bishop, Janet & Gooday, Peter & Ye, Yemin & Zhou, S., 2010. "Maximizing profits and conserving stocks in the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 1-19.
    8. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(2), pages 124-124.
    9. Nils-Arne Ekerhovd & Stein Ivar Steinshamn, 2016. "Economic Benefits of Multi-Species Management: The Pelagic Fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 193-210.
    10. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 9, pages 178-203, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Jordi Guillen & Claire Macher & Mathieu Merzereaud & M. Bertignac & S. Fifas & Olivier Guyader, 2013. "Estimating MSY and MEY in multi-species and multi-fleet fisheries, consequences and limits: an application to the Bay of Biscay mixed fishery," Post-Print hal-00835557, HAL.
    12. Hilborn, Ray, 2007. "Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 153-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamazaki, Satoshi & Jennings, Sarah & Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom, 2015. "Are marine reserves and harvest control rules substitutes or complements for rebuilding fisheries?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Selles Jules & Bonhommeau Sylvain & Guillotreau Patrice & Vallée Thomas, 2020. "Can the Threat of Economic Sanctions Ensure the Sustainability of International Fisheries? An Experiment of a Dynamic Non-cooperative CPR Game with Uncertain Tipping Point," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 153-176, May.
    3. Helene Gomes & Luc Doyen & Fabian Blanchard & Adrien Lagarde, 2021. "Viable and ecosystem-based management for tropical small-scale fisheries facing climate change," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-24, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    4. Grafton, R. Quentin & Squires, Dale & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, 2023. "Towards resilience-based management of marine capture fisheries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 231-238.
    5. Stephanie McWhinnie & Kofi Otumawu-Apreku, 2013. "The Role of Fixed Cost and Non-Discretionary Variables in Fisheries: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2013-14, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    6. Deacon, Robert T. & Finnoff, David & Tschirhart, John, 2011. "Restricted capacity and rent dissipation in a regulated open access fishery," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 366-380, May.
    7. Ekerhovd, Nils-Arne & Flåm, Sjur Didrik & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, 2021. "On shared use of renewable stocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1125-1135.
    8. Nicolas Sanz & Bassirou Diop, 2022. "Endogenous catch per unit effort and congestion externalities between vessels in a search‐matching model: Evidence from the French Guiana shrimp fishery," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 838-853, July.
    9. Giles Austen & Sarah M. Jennings & Jeffrey M. Dambacher, 2016. "Species Commodification," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 20-35, March.
    10. McCloskey Deirdre Nansen, 2018. "The Two Movements in Economic Thought, 1700–2000: Empty Economic Boxes Revisited," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Coxhead, Ian A. & Jayasuriya, Sisira, 2003. "Trade, Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: An Integrated Analysis," Staff Papers 12691, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Rauscher, Michael, 1996. "Sustainable Development and Complex Ecosystems. An Economist's View," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 02, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    13. Barkley Rosser, J. Jr., 2001. "Complex ecologic-economic dynamics and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, April.
    14. Jorge Higinio Maldonado & Rocío del Pilar Moreno-Sanchez, 2016. "Exacerbating the Tragedy of the Commons: Private Inefficient Outcomes and Peer Effect in Experimental Games with Fishing Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Strydom, M.B. & Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb, 1998. "An Economic Analysis Of Restructuring The South African Hake Quota Market," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(3), pages 1-15, September.
    16. repec:mse:cesdoc:13002r is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Horan, R.D. & Bulte, E.H., 2004. "Optimal and open access harvesting and multi-use species in a second best world," Other publications TiSEM 95000e50-7225-4f4d-aeaf-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Funk, Matt, 2008. "On the Problem of Sustainable Economic Development: A Theoretical Solution to this Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 19025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2008.
    19. Kanchanaroek, Yingluk & Termansen, Mette & Quinn, Claire, 2013. "Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 363-373.
    20. Catherine J. Morrison Paul & Ronald G. Felthoven & Marcelo de O. Torres, 2010. "Productive performance in fisheries: modeling, measurement, and management," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 343-360, July.
    21. Davis, Katrina & Pannell, David J. & Kragt, Marit & Gelcich, Stefan & Schilizzi, Steven, 2014. "Accounting for enforcement is essential to improve the spatial allocation of marine restricted-use zoning systems," Working Papers 195718, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.