IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v72y2024ics1062940824000433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does swing pricing reduce investment funds’ liquidity risk in times of market stress? – Evidence from the March-2020 episode

Author

Listed:
  • Shui-Tang Wu, Gabriel
  • Ho-Yeung Wong, Joe
  • Pak-Wing Fong, Tom

Abstract

The March-2020 episode has raised questions on whether the post-GFC reforms on the liquidity management of open-ended funds’ (OEFs) adequately contain their liquidity risk in times of market stress. Using an extensive dataset that covers this episode, our study shows that swing pricing could help to mitigate OEFs’ redemption pressures in times of market stress. However, the mitigating effect may be limited by two factors. First, swing pricing could encourage OEFs to raise leverage during normal periods, which may lead to substantial losses and amplify the redemption pressures in a stressful episode. Secondly, the swing pricing-led volatility of OEF returns is found to be associated with a larger volatility of OEFs’ flows. While our results suggest that swing pricing would be one effective tool for liquidity management of OEFs, it may come with “side effects”, including larger flow volatility and higher leverage. A proper design and combination with other risk management tools may be warranted for swing pricing to work in a more effective way.

Suggested Citation

  • Shui-Tang Wu, Gabriel & Ho-Yeung Wong, Joe & Pak-Wing Fong, Tom, 2024. "Does swing pricing reduce investment funds’ liquidity risk in times of market stress? – Evidence from the March-2020 episode," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:72:y:2024:i:c:s1062940824000433
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2024.102118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824000433
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:72:y:2024:i:c:s1062940824000433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.