IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v83y2024icp17-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can high-quality energy development and energy security achieve a win-win situation? The case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Bo
  • Dong, Kangyin
  • Zhong, Wenli
  • Zhao, Chuan

Abstract

As the world shifts towards low-carbon energy, many countries are improving energy development by promoting renewable sources such as solar photovoltaics and wind power. Does the promotion of these sources align with the objectives of energy security development? In other words, will it improve energy security? To this end, we use a provincial panel data set of 30 provinces in China from 2007 to 2019 to explore the potential impact of the high-quality energy development (HED) process on energy security, and conduct a series of robustness tests. The results indicate that HED can effectively promote China's energy security, implying that HED and energy security can achieve a win-win situation. In addition, we conduct the asymmetry analysis to establish the extent to which HED influences energy security under different energy security levels, which provides a blueprint for China's energy development paths. Finally, some policy recommendations are highlighted for improving China's energy development level to a reasonable extent and formulating relevant energy security policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Bo & Dong, Kangyin & Zhong, Wenli & Zhao, Chuan, 2024. "Can high-quality energy development and energy security achieve a win-win situation? The case of China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 17-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:83:y:2024:i:c:p:17-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624001425
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:83:y:2024:i:c:p:17-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.