IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaac/130-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrity and security in the global research ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Responsibilities for research integrity and security are distributed across multiple actors in the international research ecosystem. These include, national governments, research funding agencies, research institutions, universities, academic associations, and intergovernmental organisations. This report describes policy initiatives and actions to safeguard national and economic security whilst protecting freedom of enquiry, promoting international research cooperation, and ensuring openness and non-discrimination. It includes examples of actions that are being taking to prevent foreign interference, manage risks, and help ensure trust in science in the future, and offers recommendations to help countries develop effective policies to strengthen research security as part of a broader framework of research integrity.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2022. "Integrity and security in the global research ecosystem," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 130, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:130-en
    DOI: 10.1787/1c416f43-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/1c416f43-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/1c416f43-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fatimah, Alfariany & Britteon, Philip & Turner, Alex J & Anselmi, Laura & Gillibrand, Stephanie & Wilson, Paul & Sutton, Matt & Lau, Yiu-Shing, 2023. "Evaluating whole system reforms: A structured approach for selecting multiple outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:130-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.