IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v39y2014icp153-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From practice to evidence in child welfare: Model specification and fidelity measurement of Team Decisionmaking

Author

Listed:
  • Bearman, Sarah Kate
  • Garland, Ann F.
  • Schoenwald, Sonja K.

Abstract

Fidelity measurement methods have traditionally been used to develop and evaluate the effects of psychosocial treatments and, more recently, their implementation in practice. The fidelity measurement process can also be used to operationally define and specify components of emerging but untested practices outside the realm of conventional treatment. Achieving optimal fidelity measurement effectiveness (scientific validity and reliability) and efficiency (feasibility and relevance in routine care contexts) is challenging. The purpose of this paper is to identify strategies to address these challenges in child welfare system practices. To illustrate the challenges, and operational steps to address them, we present a case example using the “Team Decisionmaking” (TDM; Annie E. Casey Foundation) intervention. This intervention has potential utility for decreasing initial entry into and time spent in foster care and increasing rates of reunification and relative care. While promising, the model requires rigorous research to refine knowledge regarding the relationship between intervention components and outcomes—research that requires fidelity measurement. The intent of this paper is to illustrate how potentially generalizable steps for developing effective and efficient fidelity measurement methods can be used to more clearly define and test the effects of child welfare system practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Bearman, Sarah Kate & Garland, Ann F. & Schoenwald, Sonja K., 2014. "From practice to evidence in child welfare: Model specification and fidelity measurement of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 153-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:153-159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740913003034
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaye, Sarah & Osteen, Philip J., 2011. "Developing and validating measures for child welfare agencies to self-monitor fidelity to a child safety intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2146-2151.
    2. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S. & Abramson-Madden, Anne & Usher, Charles L., 2008. "Variability in the implementation of Team Decisionmaking (TDM): Scope and compliance with the Family to Family practice model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1221-1232, November.
    3. Adams, Paul, 1994. "Marketing social change: The case of family preservation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(5-6), pages 417-431.
    4. Crea, Thomas M. & Usher, Charles L. & Wildfire, Judith B., 2009. "Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 119-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leathers, Sonya J. & Diamant-Wilson, Roni & Spielfogel, Jill E. & Annes, Lee & Thomas, Amy & Garrett-Wilson, Shirlyn, 2021. "Team decision-making service planning for children and adolescents at risk for placement instability: Fidelity and initial outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    3. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crea, Thomas M. & Barth, Richard P. & Chintapalli, Laura K. & Buchanan, Rachel L., 2009. "The implementation and expansion of SAFE: Frontline responses and the transfer of technology to practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 903-910, August.
    2. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    3. Rauktis, Mary Elizabeth & Bishop-Fitzpatrick, Lauren & Jung, Nahri & Pennell, Joan, 2013. "Family group decision making: Measuring fidelity to practice principles in public child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 287-295.
    4. Snyder, Elizabeth H. & Lawrence, C. Nicole & Dodge, Kenneth A., 2012. "The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in Child and Family Teams in child welfare in North Carolina," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 639-647.
    5. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S., 2011. "The context of program implementation and evaluation: A pilot study of interorganizational differences to improve child welfare reform efforts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2273-2281.
    6. Moon, Deborah J. & Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle & Bailey Nichols, C. & Rolock, Nancy & Haran, Hana & Bai, Rong, 2022. "Collaborative fidelity assessment planning for the evaluation of a community-based maltreatment prevention model: The family success network (FSN)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Lindsey, Duncan, 1995. "Child poverty and welfare reform," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 333-345.
    8. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Rauktis, Mary E. & McCarthy, Sharon & Krackhardt, David & Cahalane, Helen, 2010. "Innovation in child welfare: The adoption and implementation of Family Group Decision Making in Pennsylvania," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 732-739, May.
    10. Ahn, Haksoon & Keyser, Daniel & Hayward-Everson, R. Anna, 2016. "A multi-level analysis of individual and agency effects on implementation of family-centered practice in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    11. Pennell, Joan & Edwards, Myles & Burford, Gale, 2010. "Expedited family group engagement and child permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1012-1019, July.
    12. Rushovich, Berenice & Hebert, Allison & Crampton, David & Malm, Karin, 2021. "Results From A Randomized Controlled Trial Of Team Decision-Making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Huhr, Scott & Wulczyn, Fred, 2022. "Do intensive in-home services prevent placement?: A case study of Youth Villages’ Intercept® program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Courtney, Mark E., 1997. "Reconsidering family preservation: A review of putting families first," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 61-76.
    15. Kaye, Sarah & Osteen, Philip J., 2011. "Developing and validating measures for child welfare agencies to self-monitor fidelity to a child safety intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2146-2151.
    16. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    17. Barak, Adi & Spielberger, Julie & Gitlow, Elissa, 2014. "The challenge of relationships and fidelity: Home visitors' perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 50-58.
    18. Akin, Becci A. & Mariscal, Susana E. & Bass, Linda & McArthur, Vickie Burgess & Bhattarai, Jackie & Bruns, Kimberly, 2014. "Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to reduce long-term foster care: Practitioner perceptions of key challenges and supports," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 285-293.
    19. Winters, Andrew M. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Antle, Becky F. & Verbist, A. Nathan, 2020. "Implementation of system-wide change in child welfare and behavioral health: The role of capacity, collaboration, and readiness for change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2011. "Theoretical adherence to family centered practice: Are strengths-based principles illustrated in families' descriptions of child welfare services?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 888-893, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:153-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.