IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v31y2009i8p903-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implementation and expansion of SAFE: Frontline responses and the transfer of technology to practice

Author

Listed:
  • Crea, Thomas M.
  • Barth, Richard P.
  • Chintapalli, Laura K.
  • Buchanan, Rachel L.

Abstract

Recent discussions of evidence-based practices have focused on translating programmatic conceptual frameworks and best practices into the "real world" of practice settings. This article discusses the implementation and expansion of the Structured Analysis Family Evaluation (SAFE) home study methodology over the course of 4 years. Survey data include the evaluations of frontline employees (n = 220), from multiple sites, regarding SAFE's ability to identify effectively families' potential issues of concern during the home study process. Perceptions of SAFE's usefulness as a home study method for a variety of family and practice situations are also measured and illuminated with qualitative accounts. Respondents indicated that SAFE more effectively identifies most issues of concern when compared with conventional methods, and that SAFE is a useful method for evaluating prospective resource families across a variety of situations. Some respondents expressed that SAFE still requires some improvements, and that some areas of home study practice in general are beyond reach for any method (e.g., applicant honesty). Given the positive responses for SAFE regarding increased thoroughness, however, this study adds to evidence that SAFE may lead to both improved practice and more accurate home studies, and lays the groundwork for further empirical exploration of the SAFE home study method.

Suggested Citation

  • Crea, Thomas M. & Barth, Richard P. & Chintapalli, Laura K. & Buchanan, Rachel L., 2009. "The implementation and expansion of SAFE: Frontline responses and the transfer of technology to practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 903-910, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:8:p:903-910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(09)00085-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Littell, Julia H., 2005. "Lessons from a systematic review of effects of multisystemic therapy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 445-463, April.
    2. D'Andrade, Amy & Frame, Laura & Duerr Berrick, Jill, 2006. "Concurrent planning in public child welfare agencies: Oxymoron or work in progress?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 78-95, January.
    3. Henggeler, Scott W. & Schoenwald, Sonja K. & Borduin, Charles M. & Swenson, Cynthia C., 2006. "Methodological critique and meta-analysis as Trojan horse," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 447-457, April.
    4. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S. & Abramson-Madden, Anne & Usher, Charles L., 2008. "Variability in the implementation of Team Decisionmaking (TDM): Scope and compliance with the Family to Family practice model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1221-1232, November.
    5. Wind, Leslie & Brooks, Devon, 2002. "Child Welfare Demonstration Projects: A Model for Implementation and Evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6-7), pages 543-558.
    6. Crea, Thomas M. & Usher, Charles L. & Wildfire, Judith B., 2009. "Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 119-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crea, Thomas M. & Griffin, Amy & Barth, Richard P., 2011. "The intersection of home study assessments and child specific recruitment: the performance of home studies in practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 28-33, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crea, Thomas M. & Usher, Charles L. & Wildfire, Judith B., 2009. "Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 119-124, January.
    2. Snyder, Elizabeth H. & Lawrence, C. Nicole & Dodge, Kenneth A., 2012. "The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in Child and Family Teams in child welfare in North Carolina," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 639-647.
    3. Bearman, Sarah Kate & Garland, Ann F. & Schoenwald, Sonja K., 2014. "From practice to evidence in child welfare: Model specification and fidelity measurement of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 153-159.
    4. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    5. Cary, Colleen E. & McMillen, J. Curtis, 2012. "The data behind the dissemination: A systematic review of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for use with children and youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 748-757.
    6. Montgomery, Paul & Belle Weisman, Clio, 2021. "Non-financial conflict of interest in social intervention trials and systematic reviews: An analysis of the issues with case studies and proposals for management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Littell, Julia H., 2008. "Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1299-1317, November.
    8. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S., 2011. "The context of program implementation and evaluation: A pilot study of interorganizational differences to improve child welfare reform efforts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2273-2281.
    9. Crea, Thomas M. & Crampton, David S. & Abramson-Madden, Anne & Usher, Charles L., 2008. "Variability in the implementation of Team Decisionmaking (TDM): Scope and compliance with the Family to Family practice model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1221-1232, November.
    10. Kaye, Sarah & Osteen, Philip J., 2011. "Developing and validating measures for child welfare agencies to self-monitor fidelity to a child safety intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2146-2151.
    11. Tom Ling, 2024. "Transferability of Lessons From Program Evaluations: Iron Laws, Hiding Hands and the Evidence Ecosystem," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 410-426, June.
    12. McBeath, Bowen & Briggs, Harold E. & Aisenberg, Eugene, 2009. "The role of child welfare managers in promoting agency performance through experimentation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 112-118, January.
    13. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    14. Preston, Mark S., 2015. "Case manager job strain in public child welfare agencies: Job demands and job control's additive effects, and instrumental feedback's mediating role," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 30-40.
    15. Goemans, Anouk & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Damen, Harm & Pijnenburg, Huub & Van Holen, Frank, 2016. "Reunification of foster children: Factors associated with reunification outcomes in Flanders and the Netherlands," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 284-292.
    16. Gorman, Dennis M. & Conde, Eugenia, 2010. "The making of evidence-based practice: The case of Project ALERT," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 214-222, February.
    17. Julia H. Littell & Melanie Popa & Burnee Forsythe, 2005. "Multisystemic Therapy for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems in Youth Aged 10–17," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-63.
    18. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Rauktis, Mary E. & McCarthy, Sharon & Krackhardt, David & Cahalane, Helen, 2010. "Innovation in child welfare: The adoption and implementation of Family Group Decision Making in Pennsylvania," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 732-739, May.
    20. Rauktis, Mary Elizabeth & Bishop-Fitzpatrick, Lauren & Jung, Nahri & Pennell, Joan, 2013. "Family group decision making: Measuring fidelity to practice principles in public child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 287-295.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:8:p:903-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.