IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v34y2012i11p2220-2228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption in the child welfare system — A cross-country analysis of child welfare workers' recommendations for or against adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Skivenes, Marit
  • Tefre, Øyvind Samnøy

Abstract

This paper, through the vignette of a three-year old boy's case, examines how child welfare workers in three countries, Norway, England and the United States (California), decide whether to recommend forced adoption. Legislation and policy recommendations for the termination of parental rights and adoption vary among these three countries, but they all regard permanency for the child as the overarching goal for children in care. We find that a majority of the workers suggest forced adoption, and their main justifications were related to parental behaviour and their failure to fulfil visitation arrangements, followed by arguments about how adoption would provide both permanency and solid attachment for the child. It was Norwegian workers (41%) that decided against forced adoption, and their main objections were the lack of parental consent and the fact that forced adoption is uncommon in Norway. The findings of this study show that the reasoning of child welfare workers clearly reflects the policies and guidelines of their respective countries, which demonstrates the impact of each country's policy instruments. The workers' reasoning also reflects their knowledge of the basic premises for promoting adoption and permanency for children in care. As such, the state power that child welfare workers exercise rests on a rationale that is evidence oriented and extends beyond a mere reflection of policy guidelines and instructions.

Suggested Citation

  • Skivenes, Marit & Tefre, Øyvind Samnøy, 2012. "Adoption in the child welfare system — A cross-country analysis of child welfare workers' recommendations for or against adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2220-2228.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:34:y:2012:i:11:p:2220-2228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740912002873
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parton, Nigel, 2009. "Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the 'social' to the 'informational'?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 715-721, July.
    2. Vinnerljung, Bo & Hjern, Anders, 2011. "Cognitive, educational and self-support outcomes of long-term foster care versus adoption. A Swedish national cohort study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1902-1910, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helland, Hege Stein, 2020. "Tipping the scales: The power of parental commitment in decisions on adoption from care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Križ, Katrin & Skivenes, Marit, 2013. "Systemic differences in views on risk: A comparative case vignette study of risk assessment in England, Norway and the United States (California)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1862-1870.
    3. Berrick, Jill & Dickens, Jonathan & Pösö, Tarja & Skivenes, Marit, 2020. "Are child protection workers and judges in alignment with citizens when considering interventions into a family? A cross-country study of four jurisdictions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Berrick, Jill Duerr & Skivenes, Marit & Roscoe, Joseph N., 2023. "Public perceptions of child protection, children’s rights, and personal values: An assessment of two states," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Skivenes, Marit & Thoburn, June, 2016. "Pathways to permanence in England and Norway: A critical analysis of documents and data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 152-160.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Rhiannon & White, James & Turley, Ruth & Slater, Thomas & Morgan, Helen & Strange, Heather & Scourfield, Jonathan, 2017. "Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 122-129.
    2. Lim, Sun Sun, 2017. "Youth workers' use of Facebook for mediated pastoralism with juvenile delinquents and youths-at-risk," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 139-147.
    3. Brady, Bernadine & Canavan, John & Redmond, Susan, 2016. "Bridging the gap: Using Veerman and Van Yperen’s (2007) framework to conceptualise and develop evidence informed practice in an Irish youth work organisation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-133.
    4. Miller, J. Jay, 2020. "Developing self-care competency among child welfare workers: A first step," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Olsen, Rikke Fuglsang & de Montgomery, Christopher J., 2018. "Revisiting out-of-home placed children's poor educational outcomes—Is school change part of the explanation?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 103-113.
    6. Evans, Rhiannon & Hallett, Sophie & Rees, Alyson & Roberts, Louise, 2016. "The acceptability of educational Interventions: Qualitative evidence from children and young people in care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 68-76.
    7. Kääriälä, Antti & Hiilamo, Heikki, 2017. "Children in out-of-home care as young adults: A systematic review of outcomes in the Nordic countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 107-114.
    8. von Borczyskowski, Annika & Vinnerljung, Bo & Hjern, Anders, 2013. "Alcohol and drug abuse among young adults who grew up in substitute care — Findings from a Swedish national cohort study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1954-1961.
    9. Lindner, Abigail Rose & Hanlon, Ryan, 2024. "Outcomes of youth with foster care experiences based on permanency outcome – Adoption, aging out, long-term foster care, and reunification: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Villegas, Susy & Rosenthal, James & O'Brien, Kirk & Pecora, Peter J., 2014. "Educational outcomes for adults formerly in foster care: The role of ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 42-52.
    11. Victoria Sharley, 2020. "Identifying and Responding to Child Neglect within Schools: Differing Perspectives and the Implications for Inter-Agency Practice," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(2), pages 551-571, April.
    12. Wilson, Samita & Hean, Sarah & Abebe, Tatek & Heaslip, Vanessa, 2020. "Children’s experiences with Child Protection Services: A synthesis of qualitative evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Jacobsen, Heidi & Bergsund, Hans Bugge & Wentzel-Larsen, Tore & Smith, Lars & Moe, Vibeke, 2020. "Foster children are at risk for developing problems in social-emotional functioning: A follow-up study at 8 years of age," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Forsman, Hilma, 2020. "Exploring educational pathways over the life course in children with out-of-home care experience: A multi-group path analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Douin, Trisha A. & Moore, Christa J., 2024. "Conveying gendered power through bureaucratic websites: A symbolic analysis of mediated child welfare culture," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Tefre, Øyvind S., 2015. "The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 87-97.
    17. Eiberg, Misja & Olsen, Rikke Fuglsang, 2022. "Too high or too low? the role of educational expectations for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Göbel, Sabrina & Hadjar, Andreas & Karl, Ute & Jäger, Julia A., 2021. "Agency and the school-to-work transition of care leavers: A retrospective study of Luxembourgish young people," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Alice Gojová & Barbora Gřundělová & Kateřina Cilečková & Monika Chrenková, 2020. "Path toward a Child-Centered Approach in the Czech Social and Legal Protection of Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Klapp, Alli, 2019. "Differences in educational achievement in norm- and criterion-referenced grading systems for children and youth placed in out-of-home care in Sweden," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 408-417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:34:y:2012:i:11:p:2220-2228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.