IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i5p704-710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"The law cannot terminate bloodlines": Families and child welfare decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Shdaimah, Corey

Abstract

Child welfare professionals are called to make determinations that affect whether children can stay or reunify with their families. These decisions are framed by policies that inform and constrain their professional and personal understanding of risk and relationships. This manuscript explores themes related to children's relationships with their families that emerged from a qualitative study with 18 child welfare professionals, including judges, lawyers, and masters-level social workers who represent different constituencies in child welfare cases. It is supplemented by interviews with 6 child-welfare involved parents, all of them biological mothers. The majority of participants' believe that existing families are nearly always better caregivers to children than legally mandated ones. Existing families are perceived as more likely to love and be loved by their children, to protect children from harm, and to be superior to currently available foster care and alternative placements. Yet, participants perceive the policies to prefer substitute, legally created families over already existing families. Such policies leave child welfare unenviable position of having to work in ways contradicts their personal and professional judgment of what is best for the families and children they serve.

Suggested Citation

  • Shdaimah, Corey, 2010. ""The law cannot terminate bloodlines": Families and child welfare decisions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 704-710, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:5:p:704-710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00012-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shdaimah, Corey S., 2009. ""CPS is not a housing agency"; Housing is a CPS problem: Towards a definition and typology of housing problems in child welfare cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 211-218, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katz, Carmit & Tener, Dafna & Nadan, Yochay & Roer-Strier, Dorit, 2020. "“What’s love got to do with this?” The construction of love in forensic interviews following child abuse," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Auerbach, Charles & Zeitlin, Wendy & Augsberger, Astraea & Lawrence, Catherine K. & Claiborne, Nancy, 2016. "Societal factors impacting child welfare: Re-validating the Perceptions of Child Welfare Scale," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 65-71.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farrell, Anne F. & Britner, Preston A. & Guzzardo, Mariana & Goodrich, Samantha, 2010. "Supportive housing for families in child welfare: Client characteristics and their outcomes at discharge," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 145-154, February.
    2. Tonino Esposito & Ashleigh Delaye & Martin Chabot & Nico Trocmé & David Rothwell & Sonia Hélie & Marie-Joelle Robichaud, 2017. "The Effects of Socioeconomic Vulnerability, Psychosocial Services, and Social Service Spending on Family Reunification: A Multilevel Longitudinal Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Font, Sarah A. & Warren, Emily J., 2013. "Inadequate housing and the child protection system response," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1809-1815.
    4. Yang, Mi-Youn & Maguire-Jack, Kathryn, 2016. "Predictors of basic needs and supervisory neglect: Evidence from the Illinois Families Study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 20-26.
    5. Semanchin Jones, Annette & Bowen, Elizabeth & Ball, Annahita, 2018. "“School definitely failed me, the system failed me”: Identifying opportunities to impact educational outcomes for homeless and child welfare-involved youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 66-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:5:p:704-710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.