IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v163y2024ics0190740924002548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering transition age youth through trauma-informed, strengths-based, youth-centered, and anti-racist practices: Implementation of a virtual breakthrough series collaborative

Author

Listed:
  • Kisiel, Cassandra
  • Guarnaccia, Uma
  • Pinkerton, Linzy
  • Garibaldi, Patricia
  • Agosti, Jen

Abstract

Trauma-informed care necessitates a focus on change at all levels of a system and a shift in organizational culture. While there has been significant progress in implementing trauma-informed interventions and practices in child-serving settings, several needs and gaps still exist. Based on existing frameworks, a trauma-informed approach needs to incorporate several key components, including strengths-based, youth centered, and anti-racist practices; yet these are not consistently applied in practice settings. A Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC), an implementation and quality improvement methodology, was used to support a comprehensive, trauma-informed approach with transition age youth (TAY), to address the gap between research and practice with this population. A virtual BSC approach was utilized for this project in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants included a total of 34 staff and youth from 5 agency teams across the U.S. that focused on implementing various components of trauma-informed care with TAY in their settings. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on participant experiences, provider-level feedback, and outcomes. Findings indicated an increase in use of several trauma-informed, strengths-based, youth-centered, and anti-racist practices as reported by teams over the course of the BSC, with greatest improvements in supporting and empowering TAY and building and nurturing positive self-identity. Providers also reported increased awareness and knowledge about the broader components of trauma-informed care and overall satisfaction with the BSC process. Certain key elements of the BSC were more effective in supporting implementation: connecting with other teams, sharing ideas and strategies, support from BSC faculty, and using small tests of change. Implications suggest the BSC is a useful approach for supporting implementation of a range of trauma-informed practices and organizational culture change. A critical aspect of trauma-informed practice with TAY requires engaging, empowering, and partnering with youth as a key aspect of practice change.

Suggested Citation

  • Kisiel, Cassandra & Guarnaccia, Uma & Pinkerton, Linzy & Garibaldi, Patricia & Agosti, Jen, 2024. "Empowering transition age youth through trauma-informed, strengths-based, youth-centered, and anti-racist practices: Implementation of a virtual breakthrough series collaborative," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924002548
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924002548
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zlotnick, C. & Tam, T.W. & Soman, L.A., 2012. "Life course outcomes on mental and physical health: The impact of foster care on adulthood," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(3), pages 534-540.
    2. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    3. Toros, Karmen & DiNitto, Diana Maria & Tiko, Anne, 2018. "Family engagement in the child welfare system: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 598-607.
    4. Lang, Jason M. & Franks, Robert P. & Epstein, Carrie & Stover, Carla & Oliver, Jason A., 2015. "Statewide dissemination of an evidence-based practice using Breakthrough Series Collaboratives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 201-209.
    5. Kemp, Susan P. & Marcenko, Maureen O. & Lyons, Sandra J. & Kruzich, Jean M., 2014. "Strength-based practice and parental engagement in child welfare services: An empirical examination," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 27-35.
    6. Fraser, Jenifer Goldman & Griffin, Jessica L. & Barto, Beth L. & Lo, Charmaine & Wenz-Gross, Melodie & Spinazzola, Joseph & Bodian, Ruth A. & Nisenbaum, Jan M. & Bartlett, Jessica Dym, 2014. "Implementation of a workforce initiative to build trauma-informed child welfare practice and services: Findings from the Massachusetts Child Trauma Project," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 233-242.
    7. Gibson, Katherine & Samuels, Gina & Pryce, Julia, 2018. "Authors of accountability: Paperwork and social work in contemporary child welfare practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 43-52.
    8. Courtney, Mark E. & Valentine, Erin J. & Skemer, Melanie, 2019. "Experimental evaluation of transitional living services for system-involved youth: Implications for policy and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 396-408.
    9. Bartlett, Jessica Dym & Rushovich, Berenice, 2018. "Implementation of Trauma Systems Therapy-Foster Care in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 30-38.
    10. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2011. "Theoretical adherence to family centered practice: Are strengths-based principles illustrated in families' descriptions of child welfare services?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 888-893, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venables, Jemma, 2019. "Practitioner perspectives on implementing an alternative response in statutory child protection: The role of local practice context and leadership teams in shaping practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Buisson, Camille & Poitras, Karine & Joyal, Christian C., 2024. "Risk of child sexual abuse: A mixed-methods analysis of judicial decisions in the Youth Court of Québec," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Toros, Karmen & DiNitto, Diana Maria & Tiko, Anne, 2018. "Family engagement in the child welfare system: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 598-607.
    4. Medina, Antonio & Beyebach, Mark & García, Felipe E., 2022. "Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a solution-focused intervention in child protection services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Williams, Annie & Reed, Hayley & Rees, Gwyther & Segrott, Jeremy, 2018. "Improving relationship–based practice, practitioner confidence and family engagement skills through restorative approach training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 170-177.
    6. Williams, Kimberly A. & Lewis, Ericka M. & Feely, Megan, 2023. "Stay just a little bit longer: A scoping review of foster parent engagement in the U.S," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Lehtme, Rafaela & Toros, Karmen, 2020. "Parental engagement in child protection assessment practice: Voices from parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Power, Luke & Hardy, Mark, 2024. "Predictors of care leavers’ health outcomes: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Dunkerley, Stacy & Brown, Amanda & Akin, Becci & McArthur, Vickie, 2024. "Honoring Family: Using parent partner expertise to strengthen a child welfare coaching program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Yanling Geng & Longtao He, 2022. "Gender Differences in Children’s Psychological Well-Being in Mainland China: Risk and Protective Factors," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2743-2763, October.
    12. Jarpe-Ratner, Elizabeth & Bellamy, Jennifer L. & Yang, Duck-Hye & Smithgall, Cheryl, 2015. "Using child welfare assessments and latent class analysis to identify prevalence and comorbidity of parent service needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 75-82.
    13. Kemp, Susan P. & Marcenko, Maureen O. & Lyons, Sandra J. & Kruzich, Jean M., 2014. "Strength-based practice and parental engagement in child welfare services: An empirical examination," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 27-35.
    14. Middel, Floor & López López, Mónica & Fluke, John & Witte, Susanne & Biehal, Nina & Grietens, Hans, 2024. "Who is involved in child protection investigations? The relationship between gender, ethnicity/migration background, and contacts between parents and caseworkers during investigations and assessments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Damian, April Joy & Gallo, Joseph J. & Mendelson, Tamar, 2018. "Barriers and facilitators for access to mental health services by traumatized youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 273-278.
    16. Haarberg, Frøydis Lønborg, 2024. "What do we know about children’s representation in child protection decisions? A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Hanne Klæboe Greger & Maria C. Stuifbergen & Thomas Jozefiak & Nanna Sønnichsen Kayed & Stian Lydersen & Tormod Rimehaug & Inga Schalinski & Astrid Røsland Seim & Marianne Tevik Singstad & Jan Walland, 2024. "Young Adults with a History of Residential Youth Care: A Cohort Profile of a Hard-to-Reach Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Tilbury, Clare & Ramsay, Sylvia, 2018. "A systematic scoping review of parental satisfaction with child protection services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 141-146.
    19. Havlicek, Judy, 2023. "“Don’t Give Up”: Persevering for a better life through community college among students with foster care experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Ruhr, Lindsay R. & Jordan Fowler, Lindsey, 2022. "Empowerment-focused positive youth development programming for underprivileged youth in the Southern U.S.: A qualitative evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924002548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.