IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v151y2023ics0190740923002311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fluid transitions – “weak” constellations of participation in the process of leaving care

Author

Listed:
  • Ehlke, Carolin
  • Schröer, Wolfgang

Abstract

This conceptual article describes how, in terms of organization theories, shifts in the chronological transition to adulthood produce “weak” constellations of participation during the process of leaving care. In contrast, the professional discourse on participation is dominated by concepts that ultimately call for “strong” constellations as a means of enabling participation. In that discourse, participation is seen as being governed by the organizational structure of the child and youth care services, which, for example, determine the chronology of the steps taken by care leavers (e.g., moving out of their residential home or the foster family) and thus also affect their opportunities for participation. Altogether, chrononormativities are seen to play a prominent guiding role. Research into participation relating to child and youth care generally pays little attention to emerging adulthood: the professional debate mainly relates to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which focuses on the age of majority as its biographical milestone. For this reason, this article will start out by summarising the research on participation during the process of leaving care. Three analyses of contemporary society taken from youth studies will then be used to describe the chronological arrangements young people currently experience during this transition. First, we will examine the dynamics influencing young people’s biographies during emerging adulthood in some countries and affecting their opportunities for participation. Second, we will focus on the varied range of life circumstances, coping situations and social disadvantages facing care leavers. Third, we will study how the “beyond Covid” situation is affecting care leavers. Finally, we will argue that in view of these unclear chronological transitional constellations during the process of leaving care, it would be fruitful for research on participation to examine “weak” constellations of as a means of identifying and analysing different signals through which people make their voices heard. This understanding of participation against the background of leaving care will make it possible to recognise not just “strong”, activating forms of participation, but also different degrees of participation and ways in which it is expressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehlke, Carolin & Schröer, Wolfgang, 2023. "Fluid transitions – “weak” constellations of participation in the process of leaving care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:151:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923002311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923002311
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Križ, Katrin & Roundtree-Swain, Dakota, 2017. "“We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”: How young adults in the public child protection system perceive their participation in decisions about their care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 32-40.
    2. Munro, Emily R. & Pinkerton, John & Mendes, Philip & Hyde-Dryden, Georgia & Herczog, Maria & Benbenishty, Rami, 2011. "The contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child to understanding and promoting the interests of young people making the transition from care to adulthood," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2417-2423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel, Thomas, 2023. "The child – Object or subject of child care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Havlicek, Judy & Curry, Ashley & Villalpando, Fabiola, 2018. "Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 255-270.
    4. Paulo Delgado & João M. S. Carvalho & Sílvia Alves, 2023. "Children and Young People’s Participation in decision-making in Foster Care," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(1), pages 421-445, February.
    5. Mathiyazhagan, Siva & Wang, Ziming, 2021. "N’KaNa-my dream: Community action towards the holistic child development in India," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Ooko, S & Okoth, A.W & Kariaga, M. G & Namazzi, E & Barasa & Achoka, J.S.K & Opiyo. A. & Elizabeth Omukunda & Njeru, F. & Dipondo, J. & Ursula Samoei, 2022. "Adolescents’ Sexual and Reproductive Health Behavior Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic in Lurambi Sub-County, Kakamega, Kenya: The Impact of Prior Knowledge," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 312-322, January.
    7. Pridmore, William & Levy, Michael H. & McArthur, Morag, 2017. "Slipping through the cracks: Examining the realities of a child-friendly prison system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 226-231.
    8. Floor Middel & Wendy Post & Mónica López López & Hans Grietens, 2021. "Participation of Children Involved in the Child Protection System – Validation of the Meaningful Participation Assessment Tool (MPAT)," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 713-735, April.
    9. Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Uggerhøj, Lars & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "“We are consultants, not collaborators”: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Lätsch, David & Quehenberger, Julia & Portmann, Rahel & Jud, Andreas, 2023. "Children’s participation in the child protection system: Are young people from poor families less likely to be heard?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Berit Skauge & Anita Skårstad Storhaug & Edgar Marthinsen, 2021. "The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:151:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923002311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.