IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v145y2023ics0190740922003978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and content validation of a comprehensive tool for assessing risk and protective factors in children and adolescents: The ACRAM

Author

Listed:
  • Navarro-Pérez, José-Javier
  • Samper, Paula
  • Sancho, Patricia
  • Georgieva, Sylvia
  • Carbonell, Ángela
  • Mestre, Maria-Vicenta

Abstract

Child maltreatment is a complex reality that has become a worldwide social and public health problem; therefore, its early detection is crucial. At present there are no scientifically rigorous instruments that cover all areas of child maltreatment. The aim of this study is to report on the development and content validation of the ACRAM (Adolescents and Children Risk of Abuse and Maltreatment) tool. This process consisted of various stages and followed a mixed methodology. Sample was composed by 144 and 80 professionals from Spain on each stage. The results are very promising and support the content validity of this tool, as we virtually all of our indicators have a good CVI and have been approved and reviewed by several groups of experts. The creation of a valid, reliable and global instrument will have significant benefits for the quality of life of children, adolescents, their families, and for professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Navarro-Pérez, José-Javier & Samper, Paula & Sancho, Patricia & Georgieva, Sylvia & Carbonell, Ángela & Mestre, Maria-Vicenta, 2023. "Development and content validation of a comprehensive tool for assessing risk and protective factors in children and adolescents: The ACRAM," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:145:y:2023:i:c:s0190740922003978
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922003978
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily Keddell, 2014. "Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Selected Literature Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Zeijlmans, Kirti & López, Mónica & Grietens, Hans & Knorth, Erik J., 2017. "Matching children with foster carers: A literature review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 257-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montserrat, Carme & Llosada-Gistau, Joan & Fuentes-Peláez, Nuria, 2020. "Child, family and system variables associated to breakdowns in family foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Emily Keddell, 2019. "Algorithmic Justice in Child Protection: Statistical Fairness, Social Justice and the Implications for Practice," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Allan, Heather & Harlaar, Nicole & Hollinshead, Dana & Drury, Ida & Merkel-Holguin, Lisa, 2017. "The impact of worker and agency characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 229-237.
    4. Keddell, Emily & Cleaver, Kerri & Fitzmaurice, Luke, 2021. "The perspectives of community-based practitioners on preventing baby removals : Addressing legitimate and illegitimate factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Van Holen, Frank & Verheyden, Camille & Van Puyenbroeck, Bert & Benbenishty, Rami, 2023. "Decision-making on out-of-home care: The case of Flanders," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Orme, John G. & Cherry, Donna J. & Brown, Jason D., 2017. "Against all odds: Vital Few foster families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 584-593.
    7. Robichaud, Marie-Joëlle & Pullen Sansfaçon, Annie & Poirier, Marie-Andrée, 2020. "Decision making at substantiation in cases involving racialized families: Child protection workers’ perceptions of influential factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Alex James & Jeanette McLeod & Shaun Hendy & Kip Marks & Delia Rusu & Syen Nik & Michael J Plank, 2019. "Using family network data in child protection services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Keddell, Emily & Davie, Gabrielle & Barson, Dave, 2019. "Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Social gradient and the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    10. O'Leary, Donna & Christie, Alistair & Perry, Ivan J. & Khashan, Ali S, 2024. "Determinants of receiving child protection and welfare services following initial assessment: A cross-sectional study from the Republic of Ireland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Haysom, Zoë & McKibbin, Gemma & Shlonsky, Aron & Hamilton, Bridget, 2020. "Changing considerations of matching foster carers and children: A scoping review of the research and evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Van Holen, Frank & Geys, Lynn & West, Delphine & Gypen, Laura & Vanderfaeillie, Johan, 2019. "Characteristics of successful foster families according to Flemish foster care workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Keddell, Emily & Hyslop, Ian, 2018. "Role type, risk perceptions and judgements in child welfare: A mixed methods vignette study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:145:y:2023:i:c:s0190740922003978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.