IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v141y2022ics0190740922002523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How child abuse by kindergarten teachers (CAKT) happens in a Chinese context: Findings based on 35 cases of CAKT

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Guan
  • Ping Qiao, Dong
  • Lu, Mengyao
  • Ting Lian, Ting

Abstract

Institutional abuse (IA) committed by professionals outside the family is an important form of child abuse. As one type of IA, while cases of child abuse by kindergarten teachers (CAKT) in China are increasing, research on the characteristics and mechanism remains scarce. The objective of this study was to address this research gap. Data were extracted from 35 criminal judicial documents involving 48 kindergarten teachers (nurses) and 247 victims aged 2–6 years. Statistical analysis was used to describe the characteristics of CAKT; qualitative thematic analysis of the stakeholders’ statements was used to disclose the mechanisms. The findings revealed the following: (a) The nature of CAKT was that by trying to control children’s conduct through physical force to achieve a desired order, teachers adopted a teacher-centered educational concept, requiring children to obey them rather than by organizing teaching activities based on the children's development stages; (b) The three most common means of committing CAKT were needling (42.9%), dragging and pressing the body (34.3%), and slapping (31.4%); (c) These abusers were relatively young and had a low level of education; (d) Teachers evaded monitoring through the concealment of abuse tools (e.g., needles, water, mustard) and abuse locations (e.g., corners of classrooms, bathrooms, storage rooms), and the perpetrators utilized strategies such as word substitution (e.g., replacing “needling” with “injection”, replacing “splashing” with “bathing”), making CAKT hard to discern, and a spoken terminology of “finger pointing” to shift the responsibility from themselves to the children, which made the children reluctant to disclose the abuse. The implications for the research and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Guan & Ping Qiao, Dong & Lu, Mengyao & Ting Lian, Ting, 2022. "How child abuse by kindergarten teachers (CAKT) happens in a Chinese context: Findings based on 35 cases of CAKT," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:141:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002523
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922002523
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Haixia & Hu, Hongwei & Zhu, Xinran & Jiang, Haochen, 2019. "Effects of school-based and community-based protection services on victimization incidence among left-behind children in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 239-245.
    2. Man, Xiaoou & Barth, Richard P. & Li, Yue-e & Wang, Zuobao, 2017. "Exploring the new child protection system in Mainland China: How does it work?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 196-202.
    3. Lyu, YuWen & Chow, Julian Chun-Chung & Hwang, Ji-Jen, 2020. "Exploring public attitudes of child abuse in mainland China: A sentiment analysis of China’s social media Weibo," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Wenjing Zhang & Jingqi Chen & Fengfeng Liu, 2015. "Preventing Child Sexual Abuse Early," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    5. Wan, Guowei & Tang, Sisi & Xu, Yicheng, 2020. "The prevalence, posttraumatic depression and risk factors of domestic child maltreatment in rural China: A gender analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guowei Wan & Huihui Gong, 2022. "Ethnic Disparities and the Psychological Trauma of Maltreated Children: Evidence from Three Multi-ethnic Counties in China," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2765-2788, October.
    2. Wan, Guowei & Tang, Sisi & Xu, Yicheng, 2020. "The prevalence, posttraumatic depression and risk factors of domestic child maltreatment in rural China: A gender analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Lei, Jie & Cai, Tian & Brown, Louise & Lu, Wei, 2019. "A pilot project using a community approach to support child protection services in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Yuwen Lyu & Julian Chun-Chung Chow & Ji-Jen Hwang & Zhi Li & Cheng Ren & Jungui Xie, 2022. "Psychological Well-Being of Left-Behind Children in China: Text Mining of the Social Media Website Zhihu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Xinghua Liu & Qian Ye & Ye Li & Jing Fan & Yue Tao, 2021. "Examining Public Concerns and Attitudes toward Unfair Events Involving Elderly Travelers during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Weibo Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Wang, Zhiyou & Chen, Ji-Kang, 2023. "Child maltreatment, social relationships and psychological distress: A multiple mediational analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Xu, Yanfeng & Man, Xiaoou & Zhang, Lixia & DeForge, Bruce, 2020. "Family foster care and children’s outcomes in China: Evidence from a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Tao Shu & Zhiyi Wang & Huading Jia & Wenjin Zhao & Jixian Zhou & Tao Peng, 2022. "Consumers’ Opinions towards Public Health Effects of Online Games: An Empirical Study Based on Social Media Comments in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Ying Lian & Xiaofeng Lin & Xuefan Dong & Shengjie Hou, 2022. "A Normalized Rich-Club Connectivity-Based Strategy for Keyword Selection in Social Media Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Lyu, YuWen & Chow, Julian Chun-Chung & Hwang, Ji-Jen, 2020. "Exploring public attitudes of child abuse in mainland China: A sentiment analysis of China’s social media Weibo," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Weigang Pan & Baixue Gao & Yihong Long & Yue Teng & Tong Yue, 2021. "Effect of Caregivers’ Parenting Styles on the Emotional and Behavioral Problems of Left-Behind Children: The Parallel Mediating Role of Self-Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Yu, Yanping & Atkinson-Sheppard, Sally & Gao, Yunjiao, 2020. "Impulsiveness or self-protection? Exploring individual perceptions, family and school strains related to why adolescents run away from home in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Dong, Xuefan & Lian, Ying, 2021. "A review of social media-based public opinion analyses: Challenges and recommendations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Zhao, Chenyue & Zhou, Xudong & Wang, Feng & Jiang, Minmin & Hesketh, Therese, 2017. "Care for left-behind children in rural China: A realist evaluation of a community-based intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 239-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:141:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.