IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v141y2022ics0190740922002274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and acceptability study of the online ACT-Raising Safe Kids program

Author

Listed:
  • Lotto, Camila Regina
  • Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani
  • Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the online version of the ACT-Raising Safe Kids Parenting Program, and the effect of improving parenting practices in the coronavirus pandemic context. The sample comprised 20 mothers of two-to-six-year-old children. The mothers answered the ACT, PAFAS, and PSOC scales in the pre- and post-intervention assessments. In addition, the acceptability questionnaire and the ACE scale were administered at post-intervention. A within-group comparison analysis was performed. The results showed that the mothers reported a significant increase in emotional/behavioral regulation and parental sense of competence, and a decrease in coercive practices in the post-intervention period compared to the pre-intervention period. The mothers reported great acceptance of the ACT online version. In conclusion, the ACT online version was feasible, acceptable, and effective in improving parenting practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Lotto, Camila Regina & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2022. "Feasibility and acceptability study of the online ACT-Raising Safe Kids program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:141:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922002274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knox, Michele & Burkhart, Kimberly, 2014. "A multi-site study of the ACT Raising Safe Kids program: Predictors of outcomes and attrition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 20-24.
    2. Baron, E. Jason & Goldstein, Ezra G. & Wallace, Cullen T., 2020. "Suffering in silence: How COVID-19 school closures inhibit the reporting of child maltreatment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Belotti, Francine & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2019. "Feasibility study of a preventive parenting program with mothers of children born preterm," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Martins, Rafaela Costa & Machado, Adriana Kramer Fiala & Shenderovich, Yulia & Soares, Tâmara Biolo & da Cruz, Suélen Henriques & Altafim, Elisa Raquel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins & Barro, 2020. "Parental attendance in two early-childhood training programmes to improve nurturing care: A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & McCoy, Dana Charles & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2018. "Relations between parenting practices, socioeconomic status, and child behavior in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belotti, Francine & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2019. "Feasibility study of a preventive parenting program with mothers of children born preterm," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Lawrenz, Priscila & Yousafzai, Aisha Khizar & Habigzang, Luísa Fernanda, 2021. "ACT Raising Safe Kids Program improves parenting practices, beliefs about physical punishment, management of anger, and mental health: Initial evidence from a study in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Martins, Rafaela Costa & Machado, Adriana Kramer Fiala & Shenderovich, Yulia & Soares, Tâmara Biolo & da Cruz, Suélen Henriques & Altafim, Elisa Raquel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins & Barro, 2020. "Parental attendance in two early-childhood training programmes to improve nurturing care: A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Fukai, Taiyo & Ikeda, Masato & Kawaguchi, Daiji & Yamaguchi, Shintaro, 2023. "COVID-19 and the employment gender gap in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Prettyman, Alexa, 2024. "Underreporting child maltreatment during the pandemic: Evidence from Colorado," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Francisco Cabrera-Hernández & Marí­a Padilla-Romo, 2020. "Hidden Violence: How COVID-19 School Closures Reduced the Reporting of Child Maltreatment," Working Papers 2020-02, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    7. David R. Agrawal & Aline Bütikofer, 2022. "Public finance in the era of the COVID-19 crisis," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(6), pages 1349-1372, December.
    8. Chen Zhu & Rigoberto A. Lopez & Yuan Gao & Xiaoou Liu, 2021. "The COVID‐19 Pandemic and Consumption of Food away from Home: Evidence from High‐frequency Restaurant Transaction Data," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(6), pages 73-94, November.
    9. Qi, Di & Wu, Yichao, 2020. "Family’s social economic status and child educational outcomes in China: The mediating effects of parenting practices and children’s learning attitudes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Seth Freedman & Kelli Marquardt & Dario Salcedo & Kosali Simon & Coady Wing, 2023. "Societal Disruptions and Child Mental Health: Evidence from ADHD Diagnosis During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Working Paper Series WP 2023-04, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    11. Dorn, Florian & Lange, Berit & Braml, Martin & Gstrein, David & Nyirenda, John L.Z. & Vanella, Patrizio & Winter, Joachim & Fuest, Clemens & Krause, Gérard, 2023. "The challenge of estimating the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 interventions – Toward an integrated economic and epidemiological approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Alexander James & Nathaly Rivera & Brock Smith, 2022. "Cash Transfers and Voter Turnout," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Economics.
    13. Clarke, Damian & Larroulet, Pilar & Pailañir, Daniel & Quintana, Daniela, 2023. "Schools as Safety Nets: Break-Downs and Recovery in Reporting of Violence against Children," IZA Discussion Papers 15859, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Lili Li & Araz Taeihagh & Si Ying Tan, 2023. "A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Wang, Shiyao & Chen, Lingling, 2024. "Father involvement in centre-based early childhood programs: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger, 2021. "The Legacy of COVID-19 in Education," IZA Discussion Papers 14796, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Malte Sandner & Stephan L. Thomsen & Libertad González Luna, 2020. "Preventing child maltreatment: Beneficial side effects of public childcare provision," Economics Working Papers 1744, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Janiak, Alexandre & Machado, Caio & Turén, Javier, 2021. "Covid-19 contagion, economic activity and business reopening protocols," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 264-284.
    19. Wendy Wolfersteig & Marisol Juarez Diaz & Diane Moreland, 2022. "Empowering Elementary and Middle School Youth to Speak Up and Be Safe: Advancing Prevention of Child Maltreatment with a Universal School-Based Curriculum," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    20. Greco, Ana M. & Pereda, Noemí & Guilera, Georgina, 2020. "Detection and reporting potential child and youth victimization cases from school: The role of knowledge," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:141:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.