IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v118y2020ics019074092031330x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does parent engagement enhance children’s emotional well-being in family team conference? Not a panacea for families with intimate partner violence

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jangmin
  • Choi, Mi Jin
  • Trahan, Mark H.
  • Bellamy, Jennifer L.
  • Pierce, Barbara

Abstract

In child welfare, the Family Team Conference (FTC) model is designed to develop an individualized case plan to promote children’s safety, permanency, and well-being through active parent engagement and community partnerships. However, no consensus has emerged regarding whether FTC is beneficial for families with Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). This study examined the role of IPV in the association between parent engagement in FTC and children’s emotional well-being. Results showed that children’s emotional well-being significantly increased when both parents engaged actively in FTC as equal partners who played a leading role in collaborative decision-making. Although IPV was not directly associated with children’s emotional well-being, it significantly moderated the positive association between parent engagement in FTC and children’s emotional well-being. More specifically, active parent engagement did not significantly enhance children’s emotional well-being when parents experienced IPV. Findings suggest that careful preparation and effective strategies to address IPV are required to ensure parents’ active engagement in FTC and enhance children’s emotional well-being. Strong partnerships among families, child welfare caseworkers, and service providers are critical for developing safety and support plans for families with IPV during FTC utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jangmin & Choi, Mi Jin & Trahan, Mark H. & Bellamy, Jennifer L. & Pierce, Barbara, 2020. "Does parent engagement enhance children’s emotional well-being in family team conference? Not a panacea for families with intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s019074092031330x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092031330X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheets, Janess & Wittenstrom, Kim & Fong, Rowena & James, Joyce & Tecci, Michael & Baumann, Donald J. & Rodriguez, Carolyne, 2009. "Evidence-based practice in family group decision-making for Anglo, African American and Hispanic families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1187-1191, November.
    2. Pennell, Joan & Edwards, Myles & Burford, Gale, 2010. "Expedited family group engagement and child permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1012-1019, July.
    3. Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Barth, Richard P. & Guo, Shenyang, 2009. "Family group decision making: A propensity score analysis to evaluate child and family services at baseline and after 36-months," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 383-390, March.
    4. Berzin, Stephanie Cosner, 2006. "Using sibling data to understand the impact of family group decision-making on child welfare outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1449-1458, December.
    5. Anna Choi, 2018. "Emotional well-being of children and adolescents: Recent trends and relevant factors," OECD Education Working Papers 169, OECD Publishing.
    6. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Fong, Rowena, 2016. "Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-102.
    7. Kim, Jangmin & Trahan, Mark & Bellamy, Jennifer & Hall, James A., 2019. "Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 147-155.
    8. Wang, Eugene W. & Lambert, Matthew C. & Johnson, Leah E. & Boudreau, Brock & Breidenbach, Rebecca & Baumann, Donald, 2012. "Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 845-850.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lambert, Matthew C. & Johnson, Leah E. & Wang, Eugene W., 2017. "The impact of family group decision-making on preventing removals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 89-92.
    2. Wang, Eugene W. & Lambert, Matthew C. & Johnson, Leah E. & Boudreau, Brock & Breidenbach, Rebecca & Baumann, Donald, 2012. "Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 845-850.
    3. Rauktis, Mary Elizabeth & Bishop-Fitzpatrick, Lauren & Jung, Nahri & Pennell, Joan, 2013. "Family group decision making: Measuring fidelity to practice principles in public child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 287-295.
    4. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Fong, Rowena, 2016. "Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-102.
    5. Kim, Jangmin & Trahan, Mark & Bellamy, Jennifer & Hall, James A., 2019. "Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 147-155.
    6. Kim, Jangmin & Pierce, Barbara J. & Jaggers, Jeremiah W. & Imburgia, Teresa M. & Hall, James A., 2016. "Improving child welfare services with family team meetings: A mixed methods analysis of caseworkers' perceived challenges," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 261-268.
    7. Tony McGinn & Paul Best & Jason Wilson & Admire Chereni & Mphatso Kamndaya & Aron Shlonsky, 2020. "Family group decision‐making for children at risk of abuse or neglect: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    8. Landsman, Miriam J. & Boel-Studt, Shamra & Malone, Kelli, 2014. "Results from a family finding experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-69.
    9. Pennell, Joan & Edwards, Myles & Burford, Gale, 2010. "Expedited family group engagement and child permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1012-1019, July.
    10. Xu, Yanfeng & Ahn, Haksoon & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2017. "Family involvement meetings: Engagement, facilitation, and child and family goals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 37-43.
    11. Wells, Rebecca & Gifford, Elizabeth J., 2013. "Implementing a case management initiative in high-need schools," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 787-796.
    12. Snyder, Elizabeth H. & Lawrence, C. Nicole & Dodge, Kenneth A., 2012. "The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in Child and Family Teams in child welfare in North Carolina," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 639-647.
    13. Chambers, Jeff M. & Lint, Sandy & Thompson, Maggie G. & Carlson, Matthew W. & Graef, Michelle I., 2019. "Outcomes of the Iowa Parent Partner program evaluation: Stability of reunification and re-entry into foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Lee, Bethany R. & Shaw, Terry V. & Gove, Britni & Hwang, Jeongha, 2010. "Transitioning from group care to family care: Child welfare worker assessments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1770-1777, December.
    15. Strozier, Anne L., 2012. "The effectiveness of support groups in increasing social support for kinship caregivers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 876-881.
    16. Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Barth, Richard P. & Guo, Shenyang, 2009. "Family group decision making: A propensity score analysis to evaluate child and family services at baseline and after 36-months," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 383-390, March.
    17. Rauktis, Mary E. & McCarthy, Sharon & Krackhardt, David & Cahalane, Helen, 2010. "Innovation in child welfare: The adoption and implementation of Family Group Decision Making in Pennsylvania," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 732-739, May.
    18. Allan, Heather & Harlaar, Nicole & Hollinshead, Dana & Drury, Ida & Merkel-Holguin, Lisa, 2017. "The impact of worker and agency characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 229-237.
    19. Jacqueline Francis & Tan-Chyuan Chin & Dianne Vella-Brodrick, 2020. "Examining Emotional Literacy Development Using a Brief On-Line Positive Psychology Intervention with Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Kimberlin, Sara E. & Anthony, Elizabeth K. & Austin, Michael J., 2009. "Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 471-481, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s019074092031330x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.