IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v109y2020ics0190740919308023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Provision of specialized services for children exposed to domestic violence: Barriers encountered in Violence Against Women (VAW) services

Author

Listed:
  • Reif, Katherine
  • Jaffe, Peter
  • Dawson, Myrna
  • Straatman, Anna-Lee

Abstract

Domestic violence is a significant global problem (Guedes, Bott, Garcia-Moreno, & Colombini, 2016). Violence Against Women (VAW) agencies, particularly shelters, are a critical resource for women and children fleeing from domestic violence. However, shelters have traditionally focused primarily on servicing adult victims, with limited funding and attention given to specialized services for children exposed to domestic violence. These children require services tailored to their unique needs and risks. Such services, particularly with respect to risk assessment and safety planning, are the focus of this study. Programs to support children have been documented in the literature for over 3 decades. The research sought to provide an up-to-date perspective on the barriers that exist to providing child-specific services within VAW agencies. To gain insight into existing practices for children’s services, interviews were analyzed with 27 service providers in the VAW sector in Ontario, Canada, most of whom worked in shelters. Through a thematic analysis of the data, we identified key barriers to child-specific service provision across VAW agencies in this province. The key challenges are linked to funding, training and a lack of child-focused resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Reif, Katherine & Jaffe, Peter & Dawson, Myrna & Straatman, Anna-Lee, 2020. "Provision of specialized services for children exposed to domestic violence: Barriers encountered in Violence Against Women (VAW) services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:109:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919308023
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919308023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenney, Angelique & Mishna, Faye & Alaggia, Ramona & Scott, Katreena, 2014. "Doing the right thing? (Re) Considering risk assessment and safety planning in child protection work with domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 92-101.
    2. Horton, Evette & Murray, Christine E. & Garr, Bethany & Notestine, Lori & Flasch, Paulina & Johnson, Catherine Higgins, 2014. "Provider perceptions of safety planning with children impacted by intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 67-73.
    3. Strega, Susan & Fleet, Claire & Brown, Leslie & Dominelli, Lena & Callahan, Marilyn & Walmsley, Christopher, 2008. "Connecting father absence and mother blame in child welfare policies and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 705-716, July.
    4. Lawrence, Ruth, 2004. "Understanding fatal assault of children: a typology and explanatory theory," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 837-852, September.
    5. Stanley, Nicky & Humphreys, Cathy, 2014. "Multi-agency risk assessment and management for children and families experiencing domestic violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 78-85.
    6. Fusco, Rachel A., 2013. "“It's hard enough to deal with all the abuse issues”: Child welfare workers' experiences with intimate partner violence on their caseloads," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1946-1953.
    7. Hughes, Judy & Chau, Shirley & Poff, Deborah C., 2011. ""They're not my favourite people": What mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence say about involvement in the child protection system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1084-1089, July.
    8. Harris, Marian S. & Hackett, Wanda, 2008. "Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 199-215, February.
    9. Reckdenwald, Amy & Parker, Karen F., 2010. "Understanding gender-specific intimate partner homicide: A theoretical and domestic service-oriented approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 951-958, September.
    10. Moles, Kerry, 2008. "Bridging the divide between child welfare and domestic violence services: Deconstructing the change process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 674-688, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montserrat, Carme & Garcia-Molsosa, Marta & Planas-Lladó, Anna & Soler-Masó, Pere, 2022. "Children’s understandings of gender-based violence at home: The role school can play in child disclosure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenney, Angelique & Mishna, Faye & Alaggia, Ramona & Scott, Katreena, 2014. "Doing the right thing? (Re) Considering risk assessment and safety planning in child protection work with domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 92-101.
    2. Olszowy, Laura & Jaffe, Peter G. & Dawson, Myrna & Straatman, Anna-Lee & Saxton, Michael D., 2020. "Voices from the frontline: Child protection workers’ perspectives on barriers to assessing risk in domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Tutty, Leslie M. & Nixon, Kendra, 2020. "Mothers abused by intimate partners: Comparisons of those with children placed by child protective services and those without," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Hughes, Judy & Chau, Shirley, 2013. "Making complex decisions: Child protection workers' practices and interventions with families experiencing intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 611-617.
    5. Fusco, Rachel A., 2013. "“It's hard enough to deal with all the abuse issues”: Child welfare workers' experiences with intimate partner violence on their caseloads," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1946-1953.
    6. Nikolova, K. & Postmus, J.L. & Buttner, C. & Bosk, E.A., 2020. "Working together to protect women and children from domestic violence: Factors influencing willingness to collaborate between organizations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Bywaters, Paul & Brady, Geraldine & Sparks, Tim & Bos, Elizabeth & Bunting, Lisa & Daniel, Brigid & Featherstone, Brid & Morris, Kate & Scourfield, Jonathan, 2015. "Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-105.
    8. Morton, Cory M. & Ocasio, Kerrie & Simmel, Cassandra, 2011. "A critique of methods used to describe the overrepresentation of African Americans in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1538-1542, September.
    9. Emily Keddell, 2022. "Mechanisms of Inequity: The Impact of Instrumental Biases in the Child Protection System," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Boatswain-Kyte, Alicia & Esposito, Tonino & Trocmé, Nico & Boatswain-Kyte, Alicia, 2020. "A longitudinal jurisdictional study of Black children reported to child protection services in Quebec, Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Holt, Stephanie, 2016. "‘Quality’ contact post-separation/divorce: A review of the literature," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 92-99.
    12. Mohamud, Faisa & Edwards, Travonne & Antwi-Boasiako, Kofi & William, Kineesha & King, Jason & Igor, Elo & King, Bryn, 2021. "Racial disparity in the Ontario child welfare system: Conceptualizing policies and practices that drive involvement for Black families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Victor, Bryan G. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Moore, Andrew & Mowbray, Orion & Evangelist, Michael & Perron, Brian E., 2016. "Foster home licensing and risk of reentry to out-of-home care following family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 112-119.
    14. Harris, Marian S. & Jackson, Lovie J. & O'Brien, Kirk & Pecora, Peter, 2010. "Ethnic group comparisons in mental health outcomes of adult alumni of foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 171-177, February.
    15. Wells, Kathleen, 2011. "A narrative analysis of one mother's story of child custody loss and regain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 439-447, March.
    16. Güneş Koç, 2022. "A Study of Femicide in Turkey From 2010 to 2017," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    17. Liao, Minli & White, Kevin R., 2014. "Post-permanency service needs, service utilization, and placement discontinuity for kinship versus non-kinship families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 370-378.
    18. Lee, Sei-Young & Villagrana, Margarita, 2015. "Differences in risk and protective factors between crossover and non-crossover youth in juvenile justice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 18-27.
    19. Fortuna Procentese & Roberto Fasanelli & Stefania Carnevale & Ciro Esposito & Noemi Pisapia & Caterina Arcidiacono & Immacolata Di Napoli, 2020. "Downside: The Perpetrator of Violence in the Representations of Social and Health Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Arruabarrena, Ignacia & De Paúl, Joaquín, 2012. "Improving accuracy and consistency in child maltreatment severity assessment in child protection services in Spain: New set of criteria to help caseworkers in substantiation decisions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 666-674.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:109:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919308023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.