IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221119831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Femicide in Turkey From 2010 to 2017

Author

Listed:
  • GüneÅŸ Koç

Abstract

This paper presents a Turkey-wide analysis of 1,000 femicide cases, collected from 100 newspapers between 2010 and 2017. The study seeks to contribute to the international femicide literature by highlighting the background and reasons for these murders, as characterized by the newspapers. The methodology involved frequency and chi-square analysis of the data retrieved from 100 newspapers collected from the homepage of kadincinayetleri.org. The study reveals that a woman’s intimate partner is the perpetrator in the highest number of femicide cases. The most common motives for femicides in international micro-level studies are (1) possessiveness and jealousy and (2) loss, separation, or divorce. The present study found these to be the first- and third-highest motives for femicide in Turkey. The motives of femicides can be interpreted in the macro-level analysis as women’s resistance to men’s domination; their demand for control over women escalates to murdering the woman as a form of backlash.

Suggested Citation

  • GüneÅŸ Koç, 2022. "A Study of Femicide in Turkey From 2010 to 2017," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221119831
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221119831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221119831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221119831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pridemore, William Alex & Freilich, Joshua D., 2005. "Gender equity, traditional masculine culture, and female homicide victimization," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 213-223.
    2. Reckdenwald, Amy & Parker, Karen F., 2010. "Understanding gender-specific intimate partner homicide: A theoretical and domestic service-oriented approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 951-958, September.
    3. Campbell, J.C. & Webster, D. & Koziol-McLain, J. & Block, C. & Campbell, D. & Curry, M.A. & Gary, F. & Glass, N. & McFarlane, J. & Sachs, C. & Sharps, P. & Ulrich, Y. & Wilt, S.A. & Manganello, J. & X, 2003. "Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results from a Multisite Case Control Study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(7), pages 1089-1097.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Richardson Vigdor & James A. Mercy, 2006. "Do Laws Restricting Access to Firearms by Domestic Violence Offenders Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 313-346, June.
    2. Gerdes, Madison B, 2023. "Assessing the relationship between gun ownership and fear of mass shootings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Lynch, Kellie R. & Jackson, Dylan B., 2021. "Firearm exposure and the health of high-risk intimate partner violence victims," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Katherine A. Vittes & Susan B. Sorenson, 2006. "Are Temporary Restraining Orders More Likely to Be Issued When Applications Mention Firearms?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 266-282, June.
    5. Cook, Philip J. & Ludwig, Jens, 2006. "The social costs of gun ownership," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 379-391, January.
    6. Kevin Petersen & Robert C. Davis & David Weisburd & Bruce Taylor, 2022. "Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    7. Bontrager Ryon, Stephanie, 2013. "Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 426-437.
    8. Pouya Gholizadeh & Behzad Esmaeili, 2020. "Developing a Multi-variate Logistic Regression Model to Analyze Accident Scenarios: Case of Electrical Contractors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Hoyle, Carolyn, 2008. "Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 323-337, March.
    10. Manisha Joshi & Susan B. Sorenson, 2010. "Intimate Partner Violence at the Scene: Incident Characteristics and Implications for Public Health Surveillance," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(2), pages 116-136, April.
    11. James F. Anderson & Kellie Reinsmith-Jones & Tazinski Lee & Adam H. Langsam, 2019. "A Tri-state Investigation of Firearms Confiscation on Three Regional University Campuses," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 22-33, September.
    12. Fernández-Kranz, Daniel & Nollenberger, Natalia & Roff, Jennifer Louise, 2020. "Bargaining under Threats: The Effect of Joint Custody Laws on Intimate Partner Violence," IZA Discussion Papers 13810, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Chopin, Julien & Fortin, Francis & Guay, Jean-Pierre & Péloquin, Olivier & Paquette, Sarah & Chartrand, Eric, 2023. "‘Till death do us part’: An integrated multi-theoretical approach to identify predictors of intimate partner homicide," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Linnea Carlsson & Henrik Lysell & Viveka Enander & Karin Örmon & Solveig Lövestad & Gunilla Krantz, 2021. "Socio-demographic and psychosocial characteristics of male and female perpetrators in intimate partner homicide: A case-control study from Region Västra Götaland, Sweden," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Anestis, Joye C. & Anestis, Michael D. & Preston, Olivia C. & Rodriguez, Taylor R., 2021. "Dispositional characteristics in firearm ownership and purchasing behavior during the 2020 purchasing surge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    16. Marjorie Pichon & Sarah Treves-Kagan & Erin Stern & Nambusi Kyegombe & Heidi Stöckl & Ana Maria Buller, 2020. "A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-35, August.
    17. Charvonne N. Holliday & Kristin Bevilacqua & Karen Trister Grace & Langan Denhard & Arshdeep Kaur & Janice Miller & Michele R. Decker, 2021. "Examining the Neighborhood Attributes of Recently Housed Partner Violence Survivors in Rapid Rehousing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    18. repec:max:cprpbr:51 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Susan B. Sorenson, 2006. "Firearm Use in Intimate Partner Violence," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 229-236, June.
    20. Durrance, Christine Piette & Golden, Shelley & Perreira, Krista & Cook, Philip, 2011. "Taxing sin and saving lives: Can alcohol taxation reduce female homicides?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 169-176, July.
    21. Jorge Mori Mojalott, 2020. "Progreso de género, acceso a la justicia y campañas de prevención como determinantes del feminicidio en Perú," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 2(01), pages 50-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221119831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.