IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v100y2019icp229-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trajectory of service use among Albertan youth with complex service need

Author

Listed:
  • Izakian, Hesam
  • Russell, Matthew Joseph
  • Zwicker, Jennifer
  • Cui, Xinjie
  • Tough, Suzanne

Abstract

Youth with complex service needs require extraordinary services that are often managed by different ministries (government departments) and in many cases from various service sectors. They often require education, child welfare, and justice services, and have increased exposure to poverty, mental health issues, chronic health conditions, and decreased high school graduation. While public services are designed to improve outcomes for youth with complex service need, little is known about how these youth use services during the child to adult transition period in Canada. Knowledge of service use in this transition is important as access and eligibility for services changes during this period for youth. To better understand the needs of youth with complex service need, we used cross-ministry administrative data from Alberta to identify service use pattern clusters from age 15 through 20 years. For revealed clusters, we report and discuss poverty, mental health use, high cost health service use, and high school completion covariate proportions. The data analysis revealed that those that used more services generally showed higher proportions of poverty, mental health use, high cost health care use, and high school incompletion than those that use less services. These service use clusters and covariate trajectories can be used to inform decision makers on how to allocate resources to support youth with complex service need during the child to adult transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Izakian, Hesam & Russell, Matthew Joseph & Zwicker, Jennifer & Cui, Xinjie & Tough, Suzanne, 2019. "Trajectory of service use among Albertan youth with complex service need," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 229-238.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:100:y:2019:i:c:p:229-238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074091830241X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Putnam-Hornstein, Emily & Needell, Barbara, 2011. "Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California's 2002 birth cohort," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1337-1344, August.
    2. Lightfoot, Elizabeth & Hill, Katharine & LaLiberte, Traci, 2011. "Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2069-2075.
    3. Putnam-Hornstein, Emily & Needell, Barbara, 2011. "Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California's 2002 birth cohort," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2400-2407.
    4. Stephanie Dunn & Jennifer D. Zwicker, 2018. "Policy Brief – Why is Uptake of the Disability Tax Credit Low in Canada? Exploring Possible Barriers to Access," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 11(2), January.
    5. Aline K. Major & Deborah R. Chester & Ranee McEntire & Gordon P. Waldo & Thomas G. Blomberg, 2002. "Pre-, Post-, and Longitudinal Evaluation of Juvenile Justice Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 301-321, June.
    6. Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Drake, Brett & Kohl, Patricia L., 2009. "Is the overrepresentation of the poor in child welfare caseloads due to bias or need?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 422-427, March.
    7. Algood, Carl L. & Hong, Jun Sung & Gourdine, Ruby M. & Williams, Abigail B., 2011. "Maltreatment of children with developmental disabilities: An ecological systems analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1142-1148, July.
    8. Simmel, Cassandra, 2010. "Why do adolescents become involved with the child welfare system? Exploring risk factors that affect young adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1831-1836, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiang, Chien-Jen & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Kim, Hyunil & Drake, Brett & Pons, Laura & Kohl, Patricia & Constantino, John N. & Auslander, Wendy, 2018. "Service engagement and retention: Lessons from the Early Childhood Connections Program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 114-127.
    2. Font, Sarah A. & Berger, Lawrence M. & Slack, Kristen S., 2012. "Examining racial disproportionality in child protective services case decisions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2188-2200.
    3. King, Bryn & Fallon, Barbara & Filippelli, Joanne & Black, Tara & O'Connor, Carolyn, 2018. "Troubled teens and challenged caregivers: Characteristics associated with the decision to provide child welfare services to adolescents in Ontario, Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-215.
    4. Witte, Susanne, 2020. "Case file analyses in child protection research: Review of methodological challenges and development of a framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Trine Staer, 2016. "Risk and Marginalization in the Norwegian Welfare Society: a National Cohort Study of Child Welfare Involvement," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(2), pages 445-470, June.
    6. Kim, Hyunil & Drake, Brett & Jonson-Reid, Melissa, 2018. "An examination of class-based visibility bias in national child maltreatment reporting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 165-173.
    7. King, Bryn & Black, Tara & Fallon, Barbara & Lung, Yu, 2021. "The role of risk in child welfare decision-making: A prospective cohort examination of families transferred to ongoing child protection services after an investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Schwartz, Ira M. & York, Peter & Nowakowski-Sims, Eva & Ramos-Hernandez, Ana, 2017. "Predictive and prescriptive analytics, machine learning and child welfare risk assessment: The Broward County experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 309-320.
    9. Maria Manuela Calheiros & Sandra Ornelas & Eunice Magalhães & Margarida Vaz Garrido, 2022. "Profiles of Young Children Involved with Child Protection Services in Portugal," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 933-958, June.
    10. Elgin, Dallas J., 2018. "Utilizing predictive modeling to enhance policy and practice through improved identification of at-risk clients: Predicting permanency for foster children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 156-167.
    11. Morrison, Maria & Drake, Brett, 2023. "Foster children in care due to parental incarceration: A national longitudinal study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Ubbesen, Mads Bonde & Petersen, Liselotte & Mortensen, Preben Bo & Kristensen, Ole Steen, 2012. "Out of care and into care again: A Danish register‐based study of children placed in out-of‐home care before their third birthday," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2147-2155.
    13. Maguire-Jack, Kathryn & Font, Sarah A., 2017. "Intersections of individual and neighborhood disadvantage: Implications for child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 44-51.
    14. Fong, Kelley, 2017. "Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty: The role of parental adversities, social networks, and social services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 5-13.
    15. Megan Feely, 2022. "Changed for the Better: The Modifiable Maltreatment Factors Framework," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, February.
    16. Cardoso, Jodi Berger & Dettlaff, Alan J. & Finno-Velasquez, Megan & Scott, Jennifer & Faulkner, Monica, 2014. "Nativity and immigration status among Latino families involved in the child welfare system: Characteristics, risk, and maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 189-200.
    17. Goodwin, Brian & Wilson, Elisabeth S. & Oware, Matthew M. & Kestian, Heather H. & Stigdon, Terry J. & Miller, Eric A., 2022. "Text mining and the examination of language used to report child maltreatment: How language impacts child welfare intake reports," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Straatmann, Viviane S. & Jackisch, Josephine & Brännström, Lars & Almquist, Ylva B., 2021. "Intergenerational transmission of out-of-home care and the role of mental health problems: Findings from Stockholm birth cohort multigenerational study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    19. Kim, Hyunil & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Kohl, Patricia & Chiang, Chien-jen & Drake, Brett & Brown, Derek & McBride, Tim & Guo, Shenyang, 2020. "Latent class analysis risk profiles: An effective method to predict a first re-report of maltreatment?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Staer, Trine & Bjørknes, Ragnhild, 2015. "Ethnic disproportionality in the child welfare system: A Norwegian national cohort study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 26-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:100:y:2019:i:c:p:229-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.