IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v71y2014icp1021-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KrigInv: An efficient and user-friendly implementation of batch-sequential inversion strategies based on kriging

Author

Listed:
  • Chevalier, Clément
  • Picheny, Victor
  • Ginsbourger, David

Abstract

Several strategies relying on kriging have recently been proposed for adaptively estimating contour lines and excursion sets of functions under severely limited evaluation budget. The recently released R package KrigInv33URL: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/KrigInv/index.html. is presented and offers a sound implementation of various sampling criteria for those kinds of inverse problems. KrigInv is based on the DiceKriging package, and thus benefits from a number of options concerning the underlying kriging models. Six implemented sampling criteria are detailed in a tutorial and illustrated with graphical examples. Different functionalities of KrigInv are gradually explained. Additionally, two recently proposed criteria for batch-sequential inversion are presented, enabling advanced users to distribute function evaluations in parallel on clusters or clouds of machines. Finally, auxiliary problems are discussed. These include the fine tuning of numerical integration and optimization procedures used within the computation and the optimization of the considered criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Chevalier, Clément & Picheny, Victor & Ginsbourger, David, 2014. "KrigInv: An efficient and user-friendly implementation of batch-sequential inversion strategies based on kriging," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1021-1034.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:1021-1034
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.03.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313001060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.03.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mebane Jr., Walter R. & Sekhon, Jasjeet S., 2011. "Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives: The rgenoud Package for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i11).
    2. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand & Van Dorpe, François & Volkova, Elena, 2008. "An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4731-4744, June.
    3. Gramacy, Robert B. & Lee, Herbert K.H., 2008. "Gaussian processes and limiting linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 123-136, September.
    4. Paulo, Rui & García-Donato, Gonzalo & Palomo, Jesús, 2012. "Calibration of computer models with multivariate output," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3959-3974.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Tong & Guo, Tong & Dong, You & Yang, Fan & Frangopol, Dan M., 2024. "Look-ahead active learning reliability analysis based on stepwise margin reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Michael Ludkovski & James Risk, 2017. "Sequential Design and Spatial Modeling for Portfolio Tail Risk Measurement," Papers 1710.05204, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Ludkovski & James Risk, 2017. "Sequential Design and Spatial Modeling for Portfolio Tail Risk Measurement," Papers 1710.05204, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    2. Bachoc, François, 2013. "Cross Validation and Maximum Likelihood estimations of hyper-parameters of Gaussian processes with model misspecification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 55-69.
    3. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    4. Jasjeet Singh Sekhon & Richard D. Grieve, 2012. "A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost‐effectiveness analyses," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(6), pages 695-714, June.
    5. Veiga, Sébastien Da & Marrel, Amandine, 2020. "Gaussian process regression with linear inequality constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Scrucca, Luca, 2013. "GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 53(i04).
    7. Pates, Nicholas J. & Kim, GwanSeon & Mark, Tyler B. & Ritter, Matthias, 2020. "Windfalls or wind falls? The Local Effects of Turbine Development on US Agricultural Land Values," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304611, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Barbillon, Pierre & Celeux, Gilles & Grimaud, Agnès & Lefebvre, Yannick & De Rocquigny, Étienne, 2011. "Nonlinear methods for inverse statistical problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 132-142, January.
    9. Georgalos, Konstantinos & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David A., 2021. "On the contribution of the Markowitz model of utility to explain risky choice in experimental research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 527-543.
    10. Owoyele, Opeoluwa & Pal, Pinaki, 2021. "A novel machine learning-based optimization algorithm (ActivO) for accelerating simulation-driven engine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Bachoc, François & Lagnoux, Agnès & Nguyen, Thi Mong Ngoc, 2017. "Cross-validation estimation of covariance parameters under fixed-domain asymptotics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 42-67.
    12. Baqun Zhang & Min Zhang, 2018. "C‐learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 891-899, September.
    13. Paulo, Rui & García-Donato, Gonzalo & Palomo, Jesús, 2012. "Calibration of computer models with multivariate output," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3959-3974.
    14. Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet & Céline Helbert & Mélina Ribaud & Céline Vial, 2019. "Four algorithms to construct a sparse kriging kernel for dimensionality reduction," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1889-1909, December.
    15. Radaideh, Majdi I. & Kozlowski, Tomasz, 2020. "Surrogate modeling of advanced computer simulations using deep Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Chaeryon Kang & Holly Janes & Ying Huang, 2014. "Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 695-707, September.
    17. Carl Müller-Crepon & Philipp Hunziker, 2018. "New spatial data on ethnicity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 687-698, September.
    18. Isabelle Salle & Marc-Alexandre Sénégas & Murat Yıldızoğlu, 2019. "How transparent about its inflation target should a central bank be?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 391-427, March.
    19. Adeola Oyenubi & Martin Wittenberg, 2021. "Does the choice of balance-measure matter under genetic matching?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 489-502, July.
    20. Isabelle SALLE & Marc-Alexandre SENEGAS & Murat YILDIZOGLU, 2013. "How Transparent About Its Inflation Target Should a Central Bank be? An Agent-Based Model Assessment," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-24, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:1021-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.