IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i7p2421-2432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of empirical null using a mixture of normals and its use in local false discovery rate

Author

Listed:
  • Park, DoHwan
  • Park, Junyong
  • Zhong, Xiaosong
  • Sadelain, Michel

Abstract

When high dimensional microarray data is given, it is of interest to select significant genes by controlling a given level of Type-I error. One popular way to control the level is the false discovery rate (FDR). This paper considers gene selection based on the local false discovery rate. In most of the previous studies, the null distribution of gene expression is commonly assumed to be a normal distribution. However, if the null distribution has heavier tail than that of normal, there may exist too many false discoveries leading to the failure of controlling the given level of FDR. We propose a novel procedure which enriches a class of null distribution based on a mixture of normals. We present simulation studies to show that our proposed procedure is less sensitive to variation of null distribution than local false discovery rate with a single normal for the null. We also provide real example of gene expression profiles of antigen-specific human CD8+ T-lymphocytes treated with cytokine Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Interleukin-15 (IL-15) for comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, DoHwan & Park, Junyong & Zhong, Xiaosong & Sadelain, Michel, 2011. "Estimation of empirical null using a mixture of normals and its use in local false discovery rate," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2421-2432, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:7:p:2421-2432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(11)00054-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allison, David B. & Gadbury, Gary L. & Heo, Moonseong & Fernandez, Jose R. & Lee, Cheol-Koo & Prolla, Tomas A. & Weindruch, Richard, 2002. "A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Efron, Bradley, 2004. "Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing: The Choice of a Null Hypothesis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 96-104, January.
    3. Robin, Stephane & Bar-Hen, Avner & Daudin, Jean-Jacques & Pierre, Laurent, 2007. "A semi-parametric approach for mixture models: Application to local false discovery rate estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5483-5493, August.
    4. van der Laan Mark J. & Birkner Merrill D. & Hubbard Alan E., 2005. "Empirical Bayes and Resampling Based Multiple Testing Procedure Controlling Tail Probability of the Proportion of False Positives," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, October.
    5. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    6. Pounds, Stan & Rai, Shesh N., 2009. "Assumption adequacy averaging as a concept for developing more robust methods for differential gene expression analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1604-1612, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iris Ivy M. Gauran & Junyong Park & Johan Lim & DoHwan Park & John Zylstra & Thomas Peterson & Maricel Kann & John L. Spouge, 2018. "Empirical null estimation using zero†inflated discrete mixture distributions and its application to protein domain data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 458-471, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marot Guillemette & Mayer Claus-Dieter, 2009. "Sequential Analysis for Microarray Data Based on Sensitivity and Meta-Analysis," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, January.
    2. Cheng, Cheng, 2009. "Internal validation inferences of significant genomic features in genome-wide screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 788-800, January.
    3. Xiang, Qinfang & Edwards, Jode & Gadbury, Gary L., 2006. "Interval estimation in a finite mixture model: Modeling P-values in multiple testing applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 570-586, November.
    4. Pounds Stanley B. & Gao Cuilan L. & Zhang Hui, 2012. "Empirical Bayesian Selection of Hypothesis Testing Procedures for Analysis of Sequence Count Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-32, October.
    5. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    6. Patrick Kline & Christopher Walters, 2019. "Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement," Papers 1907.06622, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    7. Hunt, Daniel L. & Cheng, Cheng & Pounds, Stanley, 2009. "The beta-binomial distribution for estimating the number of false rejections in microarray gene expression studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1688-1700, March.
    8. Won, Joong-Ho & Lim, Johan & Yu, Donghyeon & Kim, Byung Soo & Kim, Kyunga, 2014. "Monotone false discovery rate," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 86-93.
    9. David R. Bickel, 2014. "Small-scale Inference: Empirical Bayes and Confidence Methods for as Few as a Single Comparison," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 457-476, December.
    10. Friguet, Chloé & Causeur, David, 2011. "Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses in high-dimensional data under dependence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2665-2676, September.
    11. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Do t-Statistic Hurdles Need to be Raised?," Papers 2204.10275, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    12. Zhao, Haibing & Fung, Wing Kam, 2016. "A powerful FDR control procedure for multiple hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 60-70.
    13. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun & Weinan Wang, 2019. "Covariate‐assisted ranking and screening for large‐scale two‐sample inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 187-234, April.
    14. Rohit Kumar Patra & Bodhisattva Sen, 2016. "Estimation of a two-component mixture model with applications to multiple testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 869-893, September.
    15. He, Yi & Pan, Wei & Lin, Jizhen, 2006. "Cluster analysis using multivariate normal mixture models to detect differential gene expression with microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 641-658, November.
    16. Iris Ivy M. Gauran & Junyong Park & Johan Lim & DoHwan Park & John Zylstra & Thomas Peterson & Maricel Kann & John L. Spouge, 2018. "Empirical null estimation using zero†inflated discrete mixture distributions and its application to protein domain data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 458-471, June.
    17. T. Tony Cai & Weidong Liu, 2016. "Large-Scale Multiple Testing of Correlations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 229-240, March.
    18. Wenguang Sun & T. Tony Cai, 2009. "Large‐scale multiple testing under dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 393-424, April.
    19. Nguyen, Danh V., 2004. "On estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for false discovery rate controlling procedures in exploratory DNA microarray studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 611-637, October.
    20. Ali Karimnezhad, 2022. "A simple yet efficient method of local false discovery rate estimation designed for genome-wide association data analysis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(1), pages 159-180, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:7:p:2421-2432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.