IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i3p683-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saddlepoint approximation for semi-Markov processes with application to a cardiovascular randomised study

Author

Listed:
  • Lô, Serigne N.
  • Heritier, Stephane
  • Hudson, Malcolm

Abstract

Semi-Markov processes have gained popularity as multistate models of disease progression, but have rarely been used in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) when many endpoints are collected over time. Reasons for this include the additional complexity created by censoring, the complexity of the model usually characterised by transition intensities, and difficulties in estimating clinically relevant quantities. In this paper, we show that an indirect approach can address these issues, while accommodating censored data and permitting accurate estimation of survivor functions, hazard ratio and net reductions in risk. The technique combines saddlepoint approximation and likelihood theory to fit a semi-Markov model, specified in terms of its transition probabilities and moment-generating functions (MGFs). A key feature of this approach is that the proportional hazard (PH) assumption commonly assumed for all transition time distributions is no longer needed. Inference for clinically relevant quantities is obtained through bootstrapping or randomisation tests; a simple goodness of fit procedure exploiting the link with the cumulative incidence function for competing risks is also introduced. As illustration, an illness-death model (with transition times between randomisation, non-fatal stroke, and death) for a cardiovascular trial (LIPID) is provided. Evidence of a cumulative benefit of continued treatment, not identified by standard analysis methods in earlier published work, is presented. The technique is flexible enough to be applied extensively in clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Lô, Serigne N. & Heritier, Stephane & Hudson, Malcolm, 2009. "Saddlepoint approximation for semi-Markov processes with application to a cardiovascular randomised study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 683-698, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:683-698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00439-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Hougaard, 1999. "Fundamentals of Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 13-22, March.
    2. Ronald W. Butler & Douglas A. Bronson, 2002. "Bootstrapping survival times in stochastic systems by using saddlepoint approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(1), pages 31-49, January.
    3. S. Huzurbazar & Aparna V. Huzurbazar, 1999. "Survival and Hazard Functions for Progressive Diseases Using Saddlepoint Approximations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 198-203, March.
    4. Jin‐Jian Hsieh & Weijing Wang & A. Adam Ding, 2008. "Regression analysis based on semicompeting risks data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 3-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Su, 2016. "Flexible modelling of survival curves for censored data," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert L. Paige & A. Alexandre Trindade & P. Harshini Fernando, 2009. "Saddlepoint‐Based Bootstrap Inference for Quadratic Estimating Equations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(1), pages 98-111, March.
    2. Huazhen Lin & Ling Zhou & Chunhong Li & Yi Li, 2014. "Semiparametric transformation models for semicompeting survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 599-607, September.
    3. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    4. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    5. Menggang Yu & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2015. "Marginal and Conditional Distribution Estimation from Double-sampled Semi-competing Risks Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 87-103, March.
    6. Yang Li & Hao Liu & Xiaoshen Wang & Wanzhu Tu, 2022. "Semi‐parametric time‐to‐event modelling of lengths of hospital stays," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1623-1647, November.
    7. B. A. Griffin & S. W. Lagakos, 2008. "Design and Analysis of Arm-in-Cage Experiments: Inference for Three-State Progressive Disease Models with Common Periodic Observation Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 337-344, June.
    8. Ding, A. Adam, 2010. "Identifiability conditions for covariate effects model on survival times under informative censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(11-12), pages 911-915, June.
    9. Beate Sildnes & Bo Henry Lindqvist, 2018. "Modeling of semi-competing risks by means of first passage times of a stochastic process," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 153-175, January.
    10. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 333-342, June.
    11. Pablo Garcia-Sanchez & Olivier Pierrard, 2023. "Uncertain Lifetime, Health Investment And Welfare," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2023020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    12. Zhao, XiaoBing & Zhou, Xian, 2010. "Applying copula models to individual claim loss reserving methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 290-299, April.
    13. Stéphane Esquerré, 2019. "How do judges judge? Evidence of local effect on French bankruptcy judgments," Working Papers hal-02291688, HAL.
    14. D H Collins & A V Huzurbazar, 2008. "System reliability and safety assessment using non-parametric flowgraph models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 667-674, December.
    15. Chia-Hui Huang, 2019. "Mixture regression models for the gap time distributions and illness–death processes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 168-188, January.
    16. Peng, Mengjiao & Xiang, Liming & Wang, Shanshan, 2018. "Semiparametric regression analysis of clustered survival data with semi-competing risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 53-70.
    17. Jin-Jian Hsieh & Hong-Rui Wang, 2018. "Quantile regression based on counting process approach under semi-competing risks data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(2), pages 395-419, April.
    18. J. ANNAERT & Crispiniano Garcia Joao Batista & J. LAMOOT & G. LANINE, 2006. "Don’t Fall from the Saddle: the Importance of Higher Moments of Credit Loss Distributions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/367, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Moustafa, Kassem & Hu, Zhen & Mourelatos, Zissimos P. & Baseski, Igor & Majcher, Monica, 2021. "System reliability analysis using component-level and system-level accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    20. Jing Yang & Limin Peng, 2018. "Estimating cross quantile residual ratio with left-truncated semi-competing risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 652-674, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:3:p:683-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.