IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v50y2006i8p1995-2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional residual plots for assessing the fit of linear regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Deschepper, E.
  • Thas, O.
  • Ottoy, J.P.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Deschepper, E. & Thas, O. & Ottoy, J.P., 2006. "Regional residual plots for assessing the fit of linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(8), pages 1995-2013, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:50:y:2006:i:8:p:1995-2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(05)00050-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Dette & A. Munk, 1998. "Testing heteroscedasticity in nonparametric regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(4), pages 693-708.
    2. Davidson, Russell & Flachaire, Emmanuel, 2008. "The wild bootstrap, tamed at last," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 162-169, September.
    3. Flachaire, Emmanuel, 2005. "Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 361-376, April.
    4. D. Y. Lin & L. J. Wei & Z. Ying, 2002. "Model-Checking Techniques Based on Cumulative Residuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. Deschepper & O. Thas & J. P. Ottoy, 2008. "Tests and Diagnostic Plots for Detecting Lack‐of‐Fit for Circular‐Linear Regression Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 912-920, September.
    2. Heuchenne, Cédric & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2010. "Goodness-of-fit tests for the error distribution in nonparametric regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1942-1951, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2023. "How Reliable Are Bootstrap-Based Heteroskedasticity Robust Tests?," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 789-847, August.
    2. Cyrus J. DiCiccio & Joseph P. Romano & Michael Wolf, 2016. "Improving weighted least squares inference," ECON - Working Papers 232, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Nov 2017.
    3. Romano, Joseph P. & Wolf, Michael, 2017. "Resurrecting weighted least squares," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-19.
    4. Torben Klarl, 2014. "Is Spatial Bootstrapping A Panacea For Valid Inference?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 304-312, March.
    5. Olivier Armantier, 2006. "Estimates of Own Lethal Risks and Anchoring Effects," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 37-56, January.
    6. Lee, Taewook, 2016. "Wild bootstrap Ljung–Box test for cross correlations of multivariate time series," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 59-62.
    7. Yang He & Otávio Bartalotti, 2020. "Wild bootstrap for fuzzy regression discontinuity designs: obtaining robust bias-corrected confidence intervals," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(2), pages 211-231.
    8. Emmanuel Flachaire, 2005. "More Efficient Tests Robust to Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 219-241.
    9. Pavlidis Efthymios G & Paya Ivan & Peel David A, 2010. "Specifying Smooth Transition Regression Models in the Presence of Conditional Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-40, May.
    10. Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah & Haifeng Xu, 2020. "Exact Distribution of the F-statistic under Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form for Improved Inference," Working Papers 202027, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    11. Rasmus Landersø, 2015. "Does Incarceration Length Affect Labor Market Outcomes?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(1), pages 205-234.
    12. repec:lan:wpaper:2596 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ventura Charlin & Arturo Cifuentes, 2017. "On the correlation between stocks and art market returns," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 128-131, January.
    14. Friedrich, Sarah & Konietschke, Frank & Pauly, Markus, 2017. "A wild bootstrap approach for nonparametric repeated measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-52.
    15. Riccardo Ferretti & Andrea Cipollini & Francesco Pattarin, 2016. "Can an unglamorous non-event affect prices? The role of newspapers," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1142847-114, December.
    16. repec:lan:wpaper:2373 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Kathryn Graddy & Lara Loewenstein & Jianping Mei & Mike Moses & Rachel A. J. Pownall, 2023. "Empirical evidence of anchoring and loss aversion from art auctions," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(2), pages 279-301, June.
    18. Jinook Jeong & Byunguk Kang, 2012. "Wild-bootstrapped variance-ratio test for autocorrelation in the presence of heteroskedasticity," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1531-1542, January.
    19. Godfrey, L.G., 2006. "Tests for regression models with heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2715-2733, June.
    20. repec:lan:wpaper:2454 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:lan:wpaper:2375 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Debarsy, Nicolas & Ertur, Cem, 2019. "Interaction matrix selection in spatial autoregressive models with an application to growth theory," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 49-69.
    23. Osbat, Chiara & Corbo, Vesna, 2012. "Optimism bias? The elasticity puzzle in international economics revisited," Working Paper Series 1482, European Central Bank.
    24. Graddy, Kathryn & Pownall, Rachel A J & Loewenstein, Lara & Mei, Jianping & Moses, Mike, 2014. "Anchoring or Loss Aversion? Empirical Evidence from Art Auctions," CEPR Discussion Papers 10048, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:50:y:2006:i:8:p:1995-2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.