IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v187y2023ics0167947323001184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reparameterization of extreme value framework for improved Bayesian workflow

Author

Listed:
  • Moins, Théo
  • Arbel, Julyan
  • Girard, Stéphane
  • Dutfoy, Anne

Abstract

Using Bayesian methods for extreme value analysis offers an alternative to frequentist ones, with several advantages such as easily dealing with parametric uncertainty or studying irregular models. However, computations can be challenging and the efficiency of algorithms can be altered by poor parametrization choices. The focus is on the Poisson process characterization of univariate extremes and outline two key benefits of an orthogonal parameterization. First, Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence is improved when applied on orthogonal parameters. This analysis relies on convergence diagnostics computed on several simulations. Second, orthogonalization also helps deriving Jeffreys and penalized complexity priors, and establishing posterior propriety thereof. The proposed framework is applied to return level estimation of Garonne flow data (France).

Suggested Citation

  • Moins, Théo & Arbel, Julyan & Girard, Stéphane & Dutfoy, Anne, 2023. "Reparameterization of extreme value framework for improved Bayesian workflow," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s0167947323001184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947323001184
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2023.107807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Chavez‐Demoulin & A. C. Davison, 2005. "Generalized additive modelling of sample extremes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(1), pages 207-222, January.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1908 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tiemen Woutersen, 2011. "Consistent Estimation and Orthogonality," Advances in Econometrics, in: Missing Data Methods: Cross-sectional Methods and Applications, pages 155-178, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. G. O. Roberts & S. K. Sahu, 1997. "Updating Schemes, Correlation Structure, Blocking and Parameterization for the Gibbs Sampler," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 291-317.
    5. Albert, Clément & Dutfoy, Anne & Gardes, Laurent & Girard, Stéphane, 2020. "An extreme quantile estimator for the log-generalized Weibull-tail model," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 137-174.
    6. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504, January.
    7. Gilleland, Eric & Katz, Richard W., 2016. "extRemes 2.0: An Extreme Value Analysis Package in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 72(i08).
    8. William J. Browne & Fiona Steele & Mousa Golalizadeh & Martin J. Green, 2009. "The use of simple reparameterizations to improve the efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation for multilevel models with applications to discrete time survival models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(3), pages 579-598, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budhi Arta Surya, 2021. "Some results on maximum likelihood from incomplete data: finite sample properties and improved M-estimator for resampling," Papers 2108.01243, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    2. Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Osuntuyi, Anthony, 2016. "Efficient Gibbs sampling for Markov switching GARCH models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 37-57.
    3. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Yannick Guyonvarch, 2019. "Empirical Process Results for Exchangeable Arrays," Papers 1906.11293, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    4. Stan Tendijck & Philip Jonathan & David Randell & Jonathan Tawn, 2024. "Temporal evolution of the extreme excursions of multivariate k$$ k $$th order Markov processes with application to oceanographic data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), May.
    5. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    6. Bellelli, Francesco S. & Scarpa, Riccardo & Aftab, Ashar, 2023. "An empirical analysis of participation in international environmental agreements," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Kasy, Maximilian, 2011. "A nonparametric test for path dependence in discrete panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 172-175.
    8. Graham, Bryan S. & Hahn, Jinyong & Poirier, Alexandre & Powell, James L., 2018. "A quantile correlated random coefficients panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 305-335.
    9. Schweer, Sebastian & Wichelhaus, Cornelia, 2020. "Nonparametric estimation of the service time distribution in discrete-time queueing networks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(8), pages 4643-4666.
    10. Atı̇la Abdulkadı̇roğlu & Joshua D. Angrist & Yusuke Narita & Parag Pathak, 2022. "Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 117-151, January.
    11. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer, 2024. "Statistical Inference and A/B Testing in Fisher Markets and Paced Auctions," Papers 2406.15522, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    12. António Rua & Miguel de Carvalho, 2010. "Nonstationary Extremes and the US Business Cycle," Working Papers w201003, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    13. Waverly Wei & Maya Petersen & Mark J van der Laan & Zeyu Zheng & Chong Wu & Jingshen Wang, 2023. "Efficient targeted learning of heterogeneous treatment effects for multiple subgroups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1934-1946, September.
    14. Yao, Haixiang & Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Humphrey, Jacquelyn E., 2021. "A general approach to smooth and convex portfolio optimization using lower partial moments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Arun Chandrasekhar & Victor Chernozhukov & Francesca Molinari & Paul Schrimpf, 2012. "Inference for best linear approximations to set identified functions," CeMMAP working papers 43/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier & Gaillac, Christophe & Maurel, Arnaud, 2018. "Rationalizing Rational Expectations? Tests and Deviations," IZA Discussion Papers 11989, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Strickland, Chris M. & Martin, Gael M. & Forbes, Catherine S., 2008. "Parameterisation and efficient MCMC estimation of non-Gaussian state space models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 2911-2930, February.
    18. Ahelegbey, Daniel Felix & Giudici, Paolo & Hashem, Shatha Qamhieh, 2021. "Network VAR models to measure financial contagion," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Yun Feng & Weijie Hou & Yuping Song, 2024. "Tail risk forecasting and its application to margin requirements in the commodity futures market," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1513-1529, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s0167947323001184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.