IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v99y2024ics1045235424000376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy, accountability, accounting and trust: A critical perspective reflecting on a UK Parliamentary inquiry into the role of government accounts

Author

Listed:
  • Ferry, Laurence
  • Midgley, Henry
  • Haslam, Jim

Abstract

Democracy is a contestable concept. Variants have been mobilised/appraised in critical discourse. Concurrently, in efforts to operationalise democracy, accountability is demanded, and thus accounting, relying on a notion of trust. Advocating more studies into ‘democracy’ and ‘accountability’ in practice, we focus on the UK’s parliamentary democracy, entailing the UK legislature’s scrutiny of the executive, in turn entailing an accounting that in reasonable terms can be trusted vis-à-vis this role. We analyse hearings before the UK’s Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) over 2017–19, encompassing a Parliamentary Inquiry into the role of Government accounts. We construct an immanent critique, seeking to uncover deficiencies in ‘democratic’ practices in the terms by which they are justified. Here, a working of Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman (1995) conceptualisation of trust (considered integral to official discourse on Government accounting’s support role vis-à-vis democracy/accountability), informing analysis of PACAC’s discourse, help build critique. PACAC probed the Government’s annual reports and accounts, finding them deficient in terms of their promised integrity, benevolence and competence, entailing diminished trust: gaps in democratic purpose, accountability for democracy and competence were indicated. Elaborating, we suggest implied ways forward. We expand to consider further insights vis-à-vis radical orientation towards the democracy-accounting nexus.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferry, Laurence & Midgley, Henry & Haslam, Jim, 2024. "Democracy, accountability, accounting and trust: A critical perspective reflecting on a UK Parliamentary inquiry into the role of government accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s1045235424000376
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000376
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noel Hyndman & Mariannunziata Liguori & Renate E. Meyer & Tobias Polzer & Silvia Rota & Johann Seiwald & Ileana Steccolini, 2018. "Legitimating change in the public sector: the introduction of (rational?) accounting practices in the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1374-1399, September.
    2. Laurence Ferry & Khalid Hamid & Paula Hebling Dutra, 2023. "An international comparative study of the audit and accountability arrangements of supreme audit institutions," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 431-450, February.
    3. Margaret Greenwood & Ruijia Zhan, 2019. "Audit Adjustments and Public Sector Audit Quality," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(3), pages 511-534, September.
    4. Liguori, Mariannunziata & Steccolini, Ileana, 2018. "The power of language in legitimating public-sector reforms: When politicians “talk” accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 161-173.
    5. Thomas Ahrens, 2008. "The hidden ethics of corporate governance and the practical uses of corporate governance codes: a commentary on Bhimani," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 149-152, May.
    6. Willmott, Hugh, 1986. "Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 555-580, October.
    7. Christensen, Mark & Newberry, Susan & Potter, Bradley N., 2019. "Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-76.
    8. Owolabi Bakre & Sarah George Lauwo & Sean McCartney, 2017. "Western accounting reforms and accountability in wealth redistribution in patronage-based Nigerian society," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 1288-1308, August.
    9. Ciaran Connolly & Noel Hyndman, 2006. "The actual implementation of accruals accounting: Caveats from a case within the UK public sector," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 272-290, February.
    10. repec:eme:maj000:maj-03-2016-1357 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Fuad Rakhman & Shahrokh Saudagaran, 2023. "The effect of political budget cycle on local governments’ financial statements in a young democracy," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 512-520, July.
    12. Laurence Ferry & Henry Midgley & Pasquale Ruggiero, 2023. "Regulatory space in local government audit: An international comparative study of 20 countries," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 233-241, April.
    13. Richard Laughlin, 1995. "Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle‐range” thinking," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 63-87, March.
    14. Free, Clinton, 2008. "Walking the talk? Supply chain accounting and trust among UK supermarkets and suppliers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 629-662, August.
    15. Noel Hyndman & Mariannunziata Liguori, 2016. "Justifying accounting change through global discourses and legitimation strategies. The case of the UK central government," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 390-421, June.
    16. Sinclair, Amanda, 1995. "The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 219-237.
    17. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Robert J. Kirk & Anthony P. Wall, 2001. "Substance, Form and PFI Contracts," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 41-46, June.
    19. David Heald & Ron Hodges, 2018. "Accounting for government guarantees: perspectives on fiscal transparency from four modes of accounting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 782-804, November.
    20. Susan Addison & Frank Mueller, 2015. "The dark side of professions: the big four and tax avoidance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(8), pages 1263-1290, October.
    21. Yvonne Joyce, 2020. "Building Trust in Crisis Management: A Study of Insolvency Practitioners and the Role of Accounting Information and Processes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1622-1657, September.
    22. Enrico Guarini, 2016. "The day after: newly-elected politicians and the use of accounting information," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 499-506, November.
    23. Laurence Ferry & Claire Hardy & Henry Midgley, 2021. "Data, trust, democracy and Covid-19: the first parliamentary assessment of the UK government’s approach to data during the pandemic," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 676-678, November.
    24. Pawan Adhikari & Levi Gårseth-Nesbakk, 2016. "Implementing public sector accruals in OECD member states: Major issues and challenges," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 125-142, June.
    25. Warwick Funnell, 2007. "The Reason Why: The English Constitution and the Latent Promise of Liberty in the History of Accounting," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 265-283.
    26. Dillard, Jesse & Vinnari, Eija, 2019. "Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 16-38.
    27. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    28. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    29. Andreas Bergmann & Sandro Fuchs & Christoph Schuler, 2019. "A theoretical basis for public sector accrual accounting research: current state and perspectives," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 560-570, November.
    30. Miller, Peter & O'Leary, Ted, 1987. "Accounting and the construction of the governable person," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 235-265, April.
    31. Monir Mir & Haiwei Fan & Ian Maclean, 2017. "Public sector audit in the absence of political competition," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(9), pages 899-923, October.
    32. Goncharenko, Galina, 2023. "The Role of Accountability in Workplace Democracy," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 381-393, April.
    33. Power, Michael K., 1991. "Educating accountants: Towards a critical ethnography," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 333-353.
    34. Tobias Polzer & Johann Seiwald, 2022. "Debate: The role of intermediaries between demand and supply of performance information—the missing link?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 582-583, November.
    35. Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim & Yonekura, Akira, 2013. "Further critical reflections on a contribution to the methodological issues debate in accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 191-206.
    36. Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2018. "Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 227-237.
    37. Jean Claude Mutiganda & Janne T. Järvinen, 2021. "Understanding political accountability in a strong structuration framework," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 80-103, April.
    38. David Heald & George Georgiou, 2009. "Whole of government accounts developments in the UK: conceptual, technical and timetable issues," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 219-227, July.
    39. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    40. Stenka, Renata, 2022. "Beyond intentionality in accounting regulation: Habitual strategizing by the IASB," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    41. Laurence Ferry & Henry Midgley & Stuart Green, 2023. "Accountability, emergency and liberty during COVID-19 in the UK 2020–22," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 176-198, March.
    42. Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim & van der Walt, Sibylle, 2011. "Accountability and transparency in relation to human rights: A critical perspective reflecting upon accounting, corporate responsibility and ways forward in the context of globalisation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 765-780.
    43. van Brenk, Herman & Renes, Remko & Trompeter, Gregory M., 2022. "Auditing in the public interest: Reforming the profession by building on the strengths of the existing accounting firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    44. Noel Hyndman, 2016. "Accrual accounting, politicians and the UK—with the benefit of hindsight," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 477-479, November.
    45. Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2019. "Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: Shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    46. Brown, Judy, 2009. "Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342.
    47. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2016-2477 is not listed on IDEAS
    48. Gudrun Baldvinsdottir & Andreas Hagberg & Inga‐Lill Johansson & Kristina Jonäll & Jan Marton, 2011. "Accounting research and trust: a literature review," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 382-424, November.
    49. David Mayston, 1993. "Principals, Agents and the Economics of Accountability in the New Public Sector," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 1-1, September.
    50. Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam & Elizabeth Monk & Clare Roberts, 2006. "The emancipatory potential of online reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(5), pages 681-718, September.
    51. Jan van Helden, 2016. "Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 531-538, November.
    52. Mahama, Habib & Chua, Wai Fong, 2016. "A study of alliance dynamics, accounting and trust-as-practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 29-46.
    53. Messner, Martin, 2009. "The limits of accountability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 918-938, November.
    54. Roberts, John, 1991. "The possibilities of accountability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 355-368.
    55. Aileen Murphie & Matthew Fright, 2023. "Debate: Local public audit—Start from scratch or start from here?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 225-226, April.
    56. Josiah, Jairos & Burton, Bruce & Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2010. "Accounting for privatisation in Africa? Reflections from a critical interdisciplinary perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 374-389.
    57. Francesca Manes-Rossi, 2019. "New development: Alternative reporting formats: a panacea for accountability dilemmas?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 528-531, October.
    58. Chaidali, Panagioula (Penny) & Jones, Michael John, 2017. "It’s a matter of trust: Exploring the perceptions of Integrated Reporting preparers," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-20.
    59. Marlene Mauk, 2020. "Rebuilding Trust in Broken Systems? Populist Party Success and Citizens’ Trust in Democratic Institutions," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 45-58.
    60. Miller, Peter & Napier, Christopher, 1993. "Genealogies of calculation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 631-647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilbert, Christine & Everett, Jeff & de Castro Casa Nova, Silvia Pereira, 2024. "Patriarchy, capitalism, and accounting: A herstory," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Aresu, Simone & Monfardini, Patrizio, 2023. "Oppressed by consumerism: The emancipatory role of household accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Alshurafa, Mohammed & Kamla, Rania, 2024. "Accountability and the postcolonial identity of Palestinian human rights NGO activists," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Grisard, Claudine & Annisette, Marcia & Graham, Cameron, 2020. "Performative agency and incremental change in a CSR context," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Rodrigue, Michelle & Romi, Andrea M., 2022. "Environmental escalations to social inequities: Some reflections on the tumultuous state of Gaia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Rana, Tarek & Hoque, Zahirul, 2020. "Institutionalising multiple accountability logics in public services: Insights from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    7. Lambert, Caroline & Pezet, Eric, 2011. "The making of the management accountant - Becoming the producer of truthful knowledge," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 10-30, January.
    8. Godowski, Christophe & Nègre, Emmanuelle & Verdier, Marie-Anne, 2020. "Toward dialogic accounting? Public accountants’ assistance to works councils − A tool between hope and illusion," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Scobie, Matthew & Lee, Bill & Smyth, Stewart, 2023. "Grounded accountability and Indigenous self-determination," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    11. Cuckston, Thomas, 2022. "Accounts of NGO performance as calculative spaces: Wild Animals, wildlife restoration and strategic agency," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Irvine, Helen & Moerman, Lee, 2017. "Gambling with the public sphere: Accounting’s contribution to debate on social issues," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 35-52.
    13. Lai, Alessandro & Leoni, Giulia & Stacchezzini, Riccardo, 2014. "The socializing effects of accounting in flood recovery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 579-603.
    14. Agyemang, Gloria, 2024. "Let's have a relook at accountability," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    15. Corinne Ollier Bessieux & Emmanuelle Negre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2022. "Moving from Accounting for People to Accounting with People: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Avenues for Research," Post-Print hal-03889478, HAL.
    16. Ismail Adelopo & Ibrahim Rufai & Moshood Bello, 2023. "Financial Accountability and Religious Sentiments: The Case of Sukuk Bond," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 397-420, January.
    17. Chakhovich, Terhi & Virtanen, Tuija, 2023. "Accountability for sustainability – An institutional entrepreneur as the representative of future stakeholders," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Bala Balachandran, 2007. "Imperialismo occidental y contabilidad en Oriente: La historia del Instituto de contadores de gestión autorizados de Sri Lanka," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    19. Junne, Jaromir, 2018. "Enabling accountability: An analysis of personal budgets for disabled people," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 46-62.
    20. Dillard, Jesse & Vinnari, Eija, 2019. "Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 16-38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s1045235424000376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.