IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v100y2024ics1045235424000625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism

Author

Listed:
  • Brennan, Niamh M.
  • Edgar, Victoria C.
  • Bradley Power, Sean

Abstract

This research explores director and shareholder two-way face-to-face interactions at the shareholder meetings of Cecil Rhodes’s British South Africa Company, as reflected in verbatim minutes of those meetings. Shareholder meetings are traditionally viewed as being for accountability. Alternatively, directors may engage in manipulative game-playing through skillful political maneuvering of shareholders, thereby compromising accountability. The research analyzes unique data, comprising 25 full sets of verbatim meeting minutes of 29 shareholder meetings over the period 1895–1925, using manual close-reading interpretive content analysis. Our unit of analysis is the interactions between directors and supportive/approving and dissenting shareholders. Our research question is how did the directors and shareholders interact at the shareholder meetings. We develop a typology of 16 types of interactions the directors and shareholders used in their exchanges. We complement our analysis with illustrations of types of interactions extracted from our verbatim minutes. We demonstrate how powerful directors mobilized supportive/approving shareholders to quash the dissenting shareholders’ voices. Our findings have implications for how modern-day shareholder meetings are conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Bradley Power, Sean, 2024. "Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:100:y:2024:i:c:s1045235424000625
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pentland, Brian T., 1993. "Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 605-620.
    2. Niamh M. Brennan & Doris M. Merkl-Davies, 2014. "Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: the Dirty Laundry case," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 602-633, April.
    3. Abe Jong & Gerard Mertens & Peter Roosenboom, 2006. "Shareholders’ Voting at General Meetings: Evidence from the Netherlands," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 10(4), pages 353-380, November.
    4. Nic Apostolides & Rebecca Boden, 2005. "Cedric the Pig: Annual General Meetings and Corporate Governance in the UK," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1/2), pages 53-62, January.
    5. Helen R. Pernelet & Niamh M. Brennan, 2023. "Impression management at board meetings: accountability in public and in private," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(9), pages 340-369, August.
    6. Power, Sean Bradley & Brennan, Niamh M., 2022. "Accounting as a dehumanizing force in colonial rhetoric: Quantifying native peoples in annual reports," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Niamh M. Brennan & Doris M. Merkl-Davies, 2014. "Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: the Dirty Laundry case," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 602-633, April.
    8. Mark Freeman & Robin Pearson & James Taylor, 2007. "Technological change and the governance of joint-stock enterprise in the early nineteenth century: The case of coastal shipping," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 573-594.
    9. Amernic, Joel & Craig, Russell, 2017. "CEO speeches and safety culture: British Petroleum before the Deepwater Horizon disaster," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 61-80.
    10. Sean Bradley Power & Niamh M. Brennan, 2021. "Corporate reporting to the crown: a longitudinal case from colonial Africa," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 946-982, January.
    11. Joel Amernic & Russell Craig, 2013. "Leadership Discourse, Culture, and Corporate Ethics: CEO-speak at News Corporation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 379-394, December.
    12. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    13. Drujon d'Astros, Caecilia & Morales, Jeremy, 2024. "The silent resistance: An ethnographic study of the use of silence to resist accounting and managerialization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Maltby, Josephine, 2004. "Hadfields Ltd: its annual general meetings 1903–1939 and their relevance for contemporary corporate social reporting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 415-439.
    15. Li, Yuanzhi & Yermack, David, 2016. "Evasive shareholder meetings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 318-334.
    16. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    17. Rönnbäck, Klas & Broberg, Oskar, 2022. "From Defensive to Transformative Business Diplomacy: The British South Africa Company and the End of Chartered Company Rule in Rhodesia, 1910–1925," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(4), pages 777-803, December.
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2015-2143 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jensen, Michael C. & Warner, Jerold B., 1988. "The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders, and directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 3-24, January.
    20. Taylor, James, 2013. "Privacy, Publicity, and Reputation: How the Press Regulated the Market in Nineteenth-Century England," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(4), pages 679-701, January.
    21. Thomas Carrington & Bino Catasus, 2007. "Auditing Stories about Discomfort: Becoming Comfortable with Comfort Theory," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 35-58.
    22. Rutterford, Janette, 2012. "The Shareholder Voice: British and American Accents, 1890–1965," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 120-153, March.
    23. Nicholas Apostolides, 2007. "Directors versus Shareholders: evaluating corporate governance in the UK using the AGM scorecard," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1277-1287, November.
    24. Gavin Nicholson & Amedeo Pugliese & Pieter-Jan Bezemer, 2017. "Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: how boards balance control and collaboration," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 222-246, February.
    25. Shrives, Philip J. & Brennan, Niamh M., 2017. "Explanations for corporate governance non-compliance: A rhetorical analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 31-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fadi Alkaraan & Mohammad Albahloul & Tony Abdoush & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Nadia Gulko, 2024. "Big Four Rhetorical Strategies: Carillion's Collapse," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(2), pages 295-316, June.
    2. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    3. Power, Sean Bradley & Brennan, Niamh M., 2022. "Accounting as a dehumanizing force in colonial rhetoric: Quantifying native peoples in annual reports," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Alberto Manzari & Riccardo Savio & Marika Marandola, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance in Professional Sports Clubs: The Case of Italian Serie A," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(1), pages 173-173, February.
    5. Mihret, Dessalegn Getie, 2014. "How can we explain internal auditing? The inadequacy of agency theory and a labor process alternative," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 771-782.
    6. Sara Moggi & Gina Rossi & Chiara Leardini, 2019. "How to be accountable to local stakeholders: A lesson from savings banks," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 35-67.
    7. Carrington, Thomas, 2010. "An analysis of the demands on a sufficient audit: Professional appearance is what counts!," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 669-682.
    8. Lee, King Fuei, 2023. "The Role of Catering Incentives in ESG Disclosure," MPRA Paper 120930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mayer, Maryse & Gendron, Yves, 2024. "“Fly alone, die alone”? The clan and the production of tax expertise," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    10. Li, Wenqin & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Ding, Rong & Saadi, Samir & Zhang, Ziyang (John), 2024. "Board centrality and environmental disclosures: Evidence from the polluting Industries in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Bottausci, Chiara & Robson, Keith, 2023. "“He Hears”: An essay celebrating the 25 year anniversary of The Audit Society," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Tae Hee Kim & Sun Hye Lee & Petros Vourvachis, 2023. "Accounting Standard-Setting for an Emission Trading Scheme: The Korean Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1003-1024, February.
    13. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Radzi, Nurazwani Mat & Rosli, Mohamad Hafiz, 2020. "Impacts of Accountability, Integrity, and Internal Control on Organizational Value Creation: Evidence from Malaysian Government Linked Companies," SocArXiv ucna6_v1, Center for Open Science.
    14. Sundström, Andreas & Catasús, Bino, 2023. "Let the right one in: ‘Accounting proxemics’ in the design of performance indicators," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Federica De Santis, 2016. "Auditing Standard Change and Auditors' Everyday Practice: A Field Study," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 41-54, December.
    16. Anne Marie Garvey & Laura Parte & Bridget McNally & José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Victoria Pagan & Kathryn Haynes & Stefanie Reissner, 2023. "Accountable Selves and Responsibility Within a Global Forum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 255-270, October.
    18. Bay, Charlotta, 2018. "Makeover accounting: Investigating the meaning-making practices of financial accounts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 44-54.
    19. Ahmad, Nglaa & Haque, Shamima & Islam, Muhammad Azizul, 2024. "Modern slavery disclosure regulations in the global supply Chain: A world-systems perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:100:y:2024:i:c:s1045235424000625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.