IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1928-d497475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Marie Garvey

    (Department of Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, Universidad de Alcalá, Plaza de la Victoria, 2, Alcalá de Henares, 28802 Madrid, Spain)

  • Laura Parte

    (Department of Business and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, National Distance Education University (UNED), Paseo Senda del Rey, 11, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Bridget McNally

    (Maynooth University School of Business, Maynooth University, W23 WK26 Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

  • José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo

    (Department of Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, Universidad de Alcalá, Plaza de la Victoria, 2, Alcalá de Henares, 28802 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study focuses on true and fair view (TFV) and fair presentation (FP) in financial statements. It questions if attitudes towards the true and fair override (TFO) condition, included in European Union (EU) legislation and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), is indicative of a principles-based approach or lip service to a concept that is rarely applied. We address this subject because we consider that there should be a consensus and harmonisation on TFV—that TFO has a vital role within the principles-based framework, and while the accounting standard development process should limit the application of the TFO concept, in practice, it is an important reporting option. TFV/TFO harmonisation also has an important role in sustainability accounting, to reveal company actions which are influenced by more than just the objective of complying with the standards. In the empirical part, accounting experts from 24 European countries were surveyed. Their responses suggest a lack of clarity around the distinction between TFV and FP and a reluctance to consider, in practice, the application of the TFO. Drawing on behavioural theories—ostrich effect and comfort theory—we find explanations and reasoning behind attitudes to these cornerstone concepts. Specifically, we try to explain behavioural attitudes to TFV/FP and TFO positions, which defend uncompromising compliance with standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Marie Garvey & Laura Parte & Bridget McNally & José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1928-:d:497475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ngaire Kirk, 2006. "Perceptions of the true and fair view concept: an empirical investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 205-235, June.
    2. Katarzyna Kosmala, 2005. "True and Fair View or rzetelny i jasny obraz ? A survey of polish practitioners," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 579-602.
    3. Dan Galai, 2006. "The "Ostrich Effect" and the Relationship between the Liquidity and the Yields of Financial Assets," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(5), pages 2741-2759, September.
    4. Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting—Cognitive and Conceptual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Mathias Cöster & Gunnar Dahlin & Raine Isaksson, 2020. "Are They Reporting the Right Thing and Are They Doing It Right?—A Measurement Maturity Grid for Evaluation of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Cai, Wenwu & Lu, Jing, 2019. "Investors’ financial attention frequency and trading activity," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. David Alexander, 1999. "A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 239-253.
    8. Gilad Livne & Maureen McNichols, 2009. "An Empirical Investigation of the True and Fair Override in the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1‐2), pages 1-30, January.
    9. David Alexander, 1993. "A European true and fair view?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 59-80.
    10. Matthew Egan & William Yanxi Xu, 2020. "The true and fair view: exploring how managers, directors and auditors engage in practice," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 398-420, October.
    11. Pentland, Brian T., 1993. "Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 605-620.
    12. Sally Aisbitt & Christopher Nobes, 2001. "The true and fair view requirement in recent national implementations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 83-90.
    13. Karel Van Hulle, 1997. "The true and fair view override in the European Accounting Directives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 711-720.
    14. Arna Olafsson & Michaela Pagel, 2017. "The Ostrich in Us: Selective Attention to Financial Accounts, Income, Spending, and Liquidity," NBER Working Papers 23945, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Thomas Carrington & Bino Catasus, 2007. "Auditing Stories about Discomfort: Becoming Comfortable with Comfort Theory," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 35-58.
    16. Houghton, Keith A., 1987. "True and fair view: An empirical study of connotative meaning," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 143-152, March.
    17. David Alexander, 1993. "A European true and fair view?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 17-46.
    18. David Alexander & Eva Jermakowicz, 2006. "A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 132-164, June.
    19. Ingrid E. Fisher & Margaret R. Garnsey & Mark E. Hughes, 2016. "Natural Language Processing in Accounting, Auditing and Finance: A Synthesis of the Literature with a Roadmap for Future Research," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 157-214, July.
    20. Schaltegger, Stefan & Burritt, Roger L., 2010. "Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 375-384, October.
    21. Bebbington, Jan & Russell, Shona & Thomson, Ian, 2017. "Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-34.
    22. Katarzyna Kosmala-MacLullich, 2003. "The true and fair view construct in the context of the Polish transition economy: some local insights," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 465-487.
    23. van Zijl, Wayne & Maroun, Warren, 2017. "Discipline and punish: Exploring the application of IFRS 10 and IFRS 12," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 42-58.
    24. Niklas Karlsson & George Loewenstein & Duane Seppi, 2009. "The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 95-115, April.
    25. David Alexander & Eva Eberhartinger, 2009. "The True and Fair View in the European Union," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 571-594.
    26. David Alexander & Simon Archer, 2003. "On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the ‘true and fair override’," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 3-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rep Ana, 2021. "Notes to the Financial Statements: Current State and Improvement," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 60-78, December.
    2. Arie Pratama & Edi Jaenudin & Syaiful Anas, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance - Sustainability Disclosure Using International Financial Reporting Sustainability Standards S1 in Southeast Asian Companies: A Preliminary Assessment," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 456-472, November.
    3. Huston, Simon, 2022. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: an ablative reflexive thematic analysis of climate crisis, conservative or radical reform paradigms," OSF Preprints gykxe, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laaksonen, Jenni, 2022. "Translation, hegemony and accounting: A critical research framework with an illustration from the IFRS context," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Marie Zelenková, 2010. "The True and Fair View in the European Union [Věrný a poctivý obraz v Evropské unii]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(3), pages 101-110.
    3. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske, 2016. "Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 129-168, May.
    4. Dunk, Alan S. & Kilgore, Alan, 2000. "The Reintroduction of the True and Fair Override and Harmonization with IASC Standards in Australia: Lessons from the EU and Implications for Financial Reporting and International Trade," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 213-226, July.
    5. Lisa Evans, 2003. "The true and fair view and the ‘fair presentation’ override of IAS 1," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 311-325.
    6. Vladu Alina Beattrice & Matis Dumitru, 2012. "Importance And Vulnerability Of True And Fair View In The Romanian Accounting Environment -Case Study," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 972-977, July.
    7. Okamoto, Noriaki, 2011. "Collective intentionality and aggressive earnings management: Developing Norman Macintosh's arguments in the debate over principles- versus rules-based accounting standards," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 236-242.
    8. Kettunen, Jaana, 2017. "Interlingual translation of the International Financial Reporting Standards as institutional work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 38-54.
    9. Arnold, Marc & Pelster, Matthias & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2022. "Attention triggers and investors’ risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 846-875.
    10. Stephen Zeff & Willem Buijink & Kees Camfferman, 1999. "'True and fair' in the Netherlands: inzicht or getrouw beeld ?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 523-548.
    11. David Alexander, 1999. "A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 239-253.
    12. Axel Haller, 2002. "Financial accounting developments in the European Union: past events and future prospects," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 153-190.
    13. Katarzyna Kosmala MacLullich, 2001. "Truth and Fairness in Accounting: A Case of Polish Transition Economy," CERT Discussion Papers 0102, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    14. Viorel TURCANU & Irina GOLOCIALOVA, 2016. "Accounting truth and its assurance in entities from the Republic of Moldova," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(139), pages 769-769.
    15. Barbara Weißenberger & Gero Holthoff, 2013. "Cognitive style and connotative meaning in management accounting communication," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Lisa Evans & Rachel Baskerville & Katariina Nara, 2015. "Colliding Worlds: Issues Relating to Language Translation in Accounting and Some Lessons from Other Disciplines," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 1-36, March.
    17. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    18. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    19. Federica De Santis, 2016. "Auditing Standard Change and Auditors' Everyday Practice: A Field Study," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 41-54, December.
    20. Svatopluk Kapounek & Zuzana Kučerová & Evžen Kočenda, 2022. "Selective Attention in Exchange Rate Forecasting," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 210-229, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1928-:d:497475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.