IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v72y2015icp90-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple leaders on a multilayer social media

Author

Listed:
  • Borondo, J.
  • Morales, A.J.
  • Benito, R.M.
  • Losada, J.C.

Abstract

Twitter is a social media platform where users can interact in three different ways: following, mentioning, or retweeting. Accordingly, one can define Twitter as a multilayer social network where each layer represents one of the three interaction mechanisms. First, we review the main findings of our previous work regarding two Twitter political conversations: the 2010 Venezuelan protest and the 2011 Spanish general elections. We found that the structure of the follower layer conditions the retweet layer, as having a low number of followers represents a constrain to effectively propagate information. The collapsed directed multiplex network does not present a rich-club ordering, as politicians presided large communities of regular users in the mention layer; while media accounts were the sources from which people retweeted information. However, when considering reciprocal interactions the rich-club ordering emerges, as elite accounts preferentially interacted among themselves and largely ignored the crowd. Finally, we explore the main relationships between the community structure of the three layers. At the follower level users cluster in large and dense communities holding various hubs, that break into smaller and more segregated ones in the mention and retweet layers. Hence, we argue that to fully understand Twitter we have to analyze it as a multilayer social network, evaluating the three types of interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Borondo, J. & Morales, A.J. & Benito, R.M. & Losada, J.C., 2015. "Multiple leaders on a multilayer social media," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 90-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:72:y:2015:i:c:p:90-98
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2014.12.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077914002434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.12.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morales, A.J. & Losada, J.C. & Benito, R.M., 2012. "Users structure and behavior on an online social network during a political protest," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(21), pages 5244-5253.
    2. Wu, Fang & Huberman, Bernardo A. & Adamic, Lada A. & Tyler, Joshua R., 2004. "Information flow in social groups," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 337(1), pages 327-335.
    3. Borondo, J. & Morales, A.J. & Benito, R.M. & Losada, J.C., 2014. "Mapping the online communication patterns of political conversations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 403-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiong, Xi & Li, Yuanyuan & Qiao, Shaojie & Han, Nan & Wu, Yue & Peng, Jing & Li, Binyong, 2018. "An emotional contagion model for heterogeneous social media with multiple behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 185-202.
    2. Martin-Gutierrez, Samuel & Losada, Juan C. & Benito, Rosa M., 2023. "Multipolar social systems: Measuring polarization beyond dichotomous contexts," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. S. Martin-Gutierrez & J. C. Losada & R. M. Benito, 2018. "Recurrent Patterns of User Behavior in Different Electoral Campaigns: A Twitter Analysis of the Spanish General Elections of 2015 and 2016," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-15, December.
    4. G. Olivares & J. P. Cárdenas & J. C. Losada & J. Borondo, 2019. "Opinion Polarization during a Dichotomous Electoral Process," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-9, February.
    5. Liu, Yang & Wei, Bo & Du, Yuxian & Xiao, Fuyuan & Deng, Yong, 2016. "Identifying influential spreaders by weight degree centrality in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-7.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deffuant, Guillaume & Huet, Sylvie, 2007. "Propagation effects of filtering incongruent information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 816-825, August.
    2. Wang, Shaoli & Rong, Libin & Wu, Jianhong, 2016. "Bistability and multistability in opinion dynamics models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 388-395.
    3. Darko Cherepnalkoski & Andreas Karpf & Igor Mozetič & Miha Grčar, 2016. "Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Roth, Camille, 2007. "Empiricism for descriptive social network models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 378(1), pages 53-58.
    5. Pandey, Pradumn Kumar & Badarla, Venkataramana, 2018. "Reconstruction of network topology using status-time-series data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 573-583.
    6. Durugbo, Christopher & Tiwari, Ashutosh & Alcock, Jeffrey R., 2013. "Modelling information flow for organisations: A review of approaches and future challenges," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 597-610.
    7. Cao, GangCheng & Fang, Debin & Wang, Pengyu, 2021. "The impacts of social learning on a real-time pricing scheme in the electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    8. Kibae Kim & Jörn Altmann, 2015. "Effect of Homophily on Network Formation," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2015121, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Mar 2017.
    9. Massimiliano Zanin & David Papo & Miguel Romance & Regino Criado & Santiago Moral, 2016. "The topology of card transaction money flows," Papers 1605.04938, arXiv.org.
    10. Lynn Wu, 2013. "Social Network Effects on Productivity and Job Security: Evidence from the Adoption of a Social Networking Tool," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 30-51, March.
    11. Guimera, R. & Danon, L. & Diaz-Guilera, A. & Giralt, F. & Arenas, A., 2006. "The real communication network behind the formal chart: Community structure in organizations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 653-667, December.
    12. Sinan Aral & Paramveer S. Dhillon, 2023. "What (Exactly) Is Novelty in Networks? Unpacking the Vision Advantages of Brokers, Bridges, and Weak Ties," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1092-1115, February.
    13. Borondo, J. & Morales, A.J. & Benito, R.M. & Losada, J.C., 2014. "Mapping the online communication patterns of political conversations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 403-413.
    14. Arun Sundararajan & Foster Provost & Gal Oestreicher-Singer & Sinan Aral, 2013. "Research Commentary ---Information in Digital, Economic, and Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 883-905, December.
    15. Sinan Aral & Dylan Walker, 2011. "Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1623-1639, February.
    16. Liu, Xiaoyang & He, Daobing & Liu, Chao, 2018. "Modeling information dissemination and evolution in time-varying online social network based on thermal diffusion motion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 456-476.
    17. Gu, Jing & Zhang, Fujuan & Xu, Xun & Xue, Chaokai, 2023. "Stay or switch? The impact of venture capitalists' movement across network communities on enterprises’ innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Strakova, Lubica, 2019. "Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-272.
    19. Mirzaei, Abas & Wilkie, Dean C. & Siuki, Helen, 2022. "Woke brand activism authenticity or the lack of it," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-12.
    20. Le Thanh Ha & Pham Thi Ngoc Hanh & Nguyen Thi Thu Hang & Hoang Dang Khanh & Le Lan Phuong & Hoang Hop, 2024. "Moderating Role of Knowledge-Sharing on the Nexus of Digital Business and Natural Resources," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 408-434, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:72:y:2015:i:c:p:90-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.