IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v187y2024ics0960077924009512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric population promotes and jeopardizes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Gopal
  • He, Zhixue
  • Shen, Chen
  • Tanimoto, Jun

Abstract

The evolution of cooperation in asymmetric populations has recently garnered widespread attention. In this study, we propose a new asymmetric model to explore the impact of asymmetric behavior on cooperation evolution. Our model assumes that weak players are always forced to cooperate when interacting with strong players, while strong players always receive the temptation payoff. When encountering peers from the same category, players engage in a prisoner’s dilemma game, differing only in the intensity of the dilemma between population categories. Results suggest that in scenarios where traditional network reciprocity can support cooperation, asymmetric interactions between strong and weak players undermine this reciprocity and jeopardize the maintenance of cooperation. Conversely, in scenarios where traditional network reciprocity fails to support cooperation, asymmetric interactions enable strong players to leverage weak cooperative clusters to establish cooperation. However, as the prevalence of asymmetric interactions increases, it becomes detrimental to cooperation within the weak player subgroups, thus undermining overall cooperation. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how asymmetry impacts cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Gopal & He, Zhixue & Shen, Chen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2024. "Asymmetric population promotes and jeopardizes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924009512
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924009512
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924009512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.