IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v186y2024ics0960077924008026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of the heterogeneities of social institutions and individuals’ tendency to establish social institutions on cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yao
  • Hao, Qing-Yi
  • Qian, Jia-Li
  • Wu, Chao-Yun
  • Bi, Yan

Abstract

Punishment and reward are fundamental in promoting cooperation within human societies. However, as punishment incurs costs, it is crucial to determine who should bear these costs and what specific forms of punishment should be implemented. In previous research, the primary modes of punishment have involved punishers incurring costs to directly punish defectors and pro-social individuals supporting social institutions that indirectly sanction anti-social behaviors. Additionally, individual altruistic actions can foster social cooperation, but it is often limited by what is referred to as “second-order free-riding” behaviors exhibited by regular cooperators. To address this issue, this paper proposes a spatial prisoner’s dilemma model incorporating heterogeneous social institutions and heterogeneous attitudes of individuals towards social institutions, where pro-social individuals establish separate social punishment and social security institutions for self-support and punishment. Similarly, anti-social individuals may establish anti-social punishment institutions for counteraction. The selective investment mechanism is expected to reduce or avoid the second-order free-riding behavior to some extent. Simultaneously, to address the waste of institutional resources caused by the inability of individuals to pay high penalties, a non-wasteful model with an upper limit on punishments has also been proposed. The results of simulation and dynamic analysis indicate that heterogeneities of social institutions and individuals’ tendency to establish social institutions not only can facilitate the evolution of pro-social groups, but also suppress effectively second-order free-riding behavior in the system. Moreover, it does not induce higher order free-riding behavior. Therefore, it can greatly improve the level and environment of cooperation in the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yao & Hao, Qing-Yi & Qian, Jia-Li & Wu, Chao-Yun & Bi, Yan, 2024. "The influence of the heterogeneities of social institutions and individuals’ tendency to establish social institutions on cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924008026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924008026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Yunya & Zhang, Shuhua & Zhang, Zhipeng & Bu, Hongyu, 2020. "Impact of binary social status with hierarchical punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Rapoport, Amnon & Au, Wing Tung, 2001. "Bonus and Penalty in Common Pool Resource Dilemmas under Uncertainty," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 135-165, May.
    3. Douglas D. Heckathorn, 1989. "Collective Action and the Second-Order Free-Rider Problem," Rationality and Society, , vol. 1(1), pages 78-100, July.
    4. Michael Kosfeld & Akira Okada & Arno Riedl, 2009. "Institution Formation in Public Goods Games," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1335-1355, September.
    5. Lv, Ran & Qian, Jia-Li & Hao, Qing-Yi & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2024. "The impact of reputation-based heterogeneous evaluation and learning on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Rand, David Gertler & Dreber, Anna & Fudenberg, Drew & Ellingson, Tore & Nowak, Martin A., 2009. "Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation," Scholarly Articles 3804483, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    7. Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2002. "Altruistic punishment in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 137-140, January.
    8. Pan, Qiuhui & Wang, Yue & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "Impacts of special cooperation strategy with reward and punishment mechanism on cooperation evolution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Bettina Rockenbach & Manfred Milinski, 2006. "The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7120), pages 718-723, December.
    10. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "Supporting punishment via taxation in a structured population," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Karl Sigmund & Christoph Hauert & Arne Traulsen & Hannelore Silva, 2011. "Social Control and the Social Contract: The Emergence of Sanctioning Systems for Collective Action," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 149-171, March.
    12. David G. Rand & Martin A. Nowak, 2011. "The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, September.
    13. Quan, Ji & Pu, Zhenjuan & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Comparison of social exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation: Who should play the leading role?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Mohammad Salahshour, 2021. "Evolution of prosocial punishment in unstructured and structured populations and in the presence of antisocial punishment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Isamu Okada & Hitoshi Yamamoto & Fujio Toriumi & Tatsuya Sasaki, 2015. "The Effect of Incentives and Meta-incentives on the Evolution of Cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    19. Dirk Helbing & Attila Szolnoki & Matjaž Perc & György Szabó, 2010. "Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-9, April.
    20. Quan, Ji & Cui, Shihui & Chen, Wenman & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Reputation-based probabilistic punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    21. Karl Sigmund & Hannelore De Silva & Arne Traulsen & Christoph Hauert, 2010. "Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7308), pages 861-863, August.
    22. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2022. "Mercenary punishment in structured populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Qian, Jun & Zhang, Tongda & Zhang, Yingfeng & Chai, Yueting & Sun, Xiao & Wang, Zhen, 2023. "The construction of peer punishment preference: how central power shapes prosocial and antisocial punishment behaviors," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 442(C).
    3. Boyu Zhang & Cong Li & Hannelore Silva & Peter Bednarik & Karl Sigmund, 2014. "The evolution of sanctioning institutions: an experimental approach to the social contract," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(2), pages 285-303, June.
    4. Zhang, Yao & Hao, Qing-Yi & Qian, Jia-Li & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2024. "The cooperative evolution in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game with the local loyalty of two-strategy," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    5. Luo-Luo Jiang & Matjaž Perc & Attila Szolnoki, 2013. "If Cooperation Is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    6. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Wang, Xianjia & Ding, Rui & Zhao, Jinhua & Chen, Wenman & Gu, Cuiling, 2022. "Competition of punishment and reward among inequity-averse individuals in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Alexander Isakov & David Rand, 2012. "The Evolution of Coercive Institutional Punishment," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 97-109, March.
    9. Si, Zehua & He, Zhixue & Shen, Chen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2023. "Speculative defectors as unexpected insulators of super cooperators in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Zhu, Wenqiang & Pan, Qiuhui & Song, Sha & He, Mingfeng, 2023. "Effects of exposure-based reward and punishment on the evolution of cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Wang, Jianwei & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Xu, Wenshu & Dai, Wenhui & Ming, Yuexin, 2023. "Promotion, Disintegration and Remediation of group cooperation under heterogeneous distribution system based on peer rating," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Xie, Kai & Liu, Tingjin, 2024. "The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    13. Sun, Xingping & Li, Mingyuan & Kang, Hongwei & Shen, Yong & Chen, Qingyi, 2023. "Combined effect of pure punishment and reward in the public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    14. Tatsuya Sasaki, 2014. "The Evolution of Cooperation Through Institutional Incentives and Optional Participation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 345-362, September.
    15. Satoshi Uchida & Hitoshi Yamamoto & Isamu Okada & Tatsuya Sasaki, 2019. "Evolution of Cooperation with Peer Punishment under Prospect Theory," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, February.
    16. José M Galán & Maciej M Łatek & Seyed M Mussavi Rizi, 2011. "Axelrod's Metanorm Games on Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Yamamoto, Hitoshi & Okada, Isamu, 2016. "How to keep punishment to maintain cooperation: Introducing social vaccine," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 526-536.
    18. Todd Bodnar & Marcel Salathé, 2012. "Governing the Global Commons with Local Institutions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    19. Mateus Joffily & David Masclet & Charles N Noussair & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "Emotions, Sanctions, and Cooperation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(4), pages 1002-1027, April.
    20. Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Promoting Cooperation: the Distribution of Reward and Punishment Power," Discussion Papers 2012-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924008026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.