IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v177y2023ics0960077923011633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increased earthquake rate prior to mainshocks

Author

Listed:
  • Asher, Eitan E.
  • Havlin, Shlomo
  • Moshel, Shay
  • Ashkenazy, Yosef

Abstract

According to the Omori-Utsu law, the rate of aftershocks after a mainshock decays as a power law with an exponent close to 1. This well-established law was intensively used in the past to study and model the statistical properties of earthquakes. Moreover, according to the so-called inverse Omori law, the rate of earthquakes should also increase prior to a mainshock—this law has received much less attention due to its large uncertainty. Here, we mainly study the inverse Omori law based on a highly detailed Southern California earthquake catalog, which is complete for magnitudes mc≥1 or even lower. First, we develop a technique to identify mainshocks, foreshocks, and aftershocks. We then find, based on a statistical procedure we developed, that the rate of earthquakes is higher a few days prior to a mainshock. We find that this increase is much smaller for (a) a catalog with a magnitude threshold of mc=2.5 and (b) for the Epidemic-Type Aftershocks Sequence (ETAS) model catalogs, even when used with a small magnitude threshold (i.e., mc=1). We also analyze the rate of aftershocks after mainshocks and find that the Omori-Utsu law does not hold for many individual mainshocks and that it may be valid only statistically when considering many mainshocks together. Yet, the analysis of the ETAS model based on the Omori-Utsu law exhibits similar behavior as that of the real catalogs, indicating the validity of this law.

Suggested Citation

  • Asher, Eitan E. & Havlin, Shlomo & Moshel, Shay & Ashkenazy, Yosef, 2023. "Increased earthquake rate prior to mainshocks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923011633
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923011633
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory C. Beroza & Margarita Segou & S. Mostafa Mousavi, 2021. "Machine learning and earthquake forecasting—next steps," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Matthew C. Gerstenberger & Stefan Wiemer & Lucile M. Jones & Paul A. Reasenberg, 2005. "Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7040), pages 328-331, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcus Herrmann & Ester Piegari & Warner Marzocchi, 2022. "Revealing the spatiotemporal complexity of the magnitude distribution and b-value during an earthquake sequence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Salma Ommi & Milad Janalipour, 2022. "Selection of shelters after earthquake using probabilistic seismic aftershock hazard analysis and remote sensing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 345-363, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923011633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.