IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v158y2022ics0960077922001217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-taking in social Parrondo’s games can lead to Simpson’s paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Lai, Joel Weijia
  • Cheong, Kang Hao

Abstract

Parrondo’s paradox (inspired by the flashing Brownian ratchet) and Simpson’s paradox (a statistical phenomenon) are two popular paradoxes that have attracted immense interest across many fields ranging from decision theory, evolutionary biology to social dynamics. In this article, we show that risk-taking behaviour through aggregate decision-making on Parrondo’s games can lead to the emergence of Simpson’s paradox. By partitioning the network of individuals according to risk-taking behaviours, we show that it is possible that the trend of capital losses from playing Parrondo’s games reverses when these groups are combined—the signature of Simpson’s paradox. This work reports on the emergence of the double paradox on a scale-free network and a social network, with the potential to uncover such instances in other social settings as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Lai, Joel Weijia & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2022. "Risk-taking in social Parrondo’s games can lead to Simpson’s paradox," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922001217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077922001217
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan Jagau & Theo Offerman, 2018. "Defaults, normative anchors, and the occurrence of risky and cautious shifts," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 211-236, June.
    2. Libby, R & Fishburn, Pc, 1977. "Behavioral-Models Of Risk-Taking In Business Decisions - Survey And Evaluation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 272-292.
    3. Gregory P. Harmer & Derek Abbott, 1999. "Losing strategies can win by Parrondo's paradox," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6764), pages 864-864, December.
    4. Mendoza, Steve A. & Matt, Eliza W. & Guimarães-Blandón, Diego R. & Peacock-López, Enrique, 2018. "Parrondo’s paradox or chaos control in discrete two-dimensional dynamic systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 86-93.
    5. Nigel Nicholson & Emma Soane & Mark Fenton-O'Creevy & Paul Willman, 2005. "Personality and domain-specific risk taking," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 157-176, March.
    6. Rick L. Riolo & Michael D. Cohen & Robert Axelrod, 2001. "Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 441-443, November.
    7. Zhang, M. & Wang, Si-Yi & Hu, Xin-Tao & Alfaro-Bittner, K., 2021. "Local and global information affect cooperation in networked Prisoner’s dilemma games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Ye, Ye & Hang, Xiao Rong & Koh, Jin Ming & Miszczak, Jarosław Adam & Cheong, Kang Hao & Xie, Neng-gang, 2020. "Passive network evolution promotes group welfare in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Rosas, Alexandre, 2021. "Synchronization induced by alternation of dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P2).
    10. Mendoza, Steve A. & Peacock-López, Enrique, 2018. "Switching induced oscillations in discrete one-dimensional systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 35-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Joel Weijia & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2023. "Boosting Brownian-inspired games with network synchronization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai, Joel Weijia & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2023. "Boosting Brownian-inspired games with network synchronization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Ye, Ye & Zhang, Xin-shi & Liu, Lin & Xie, Neng-Gang, 2021. "Effects of group interactions on the network Parrondo’s games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    3. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    4. Marco R Steenbergen & Tomasz Siczek, 2017. "Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 119-136, March.
    5. Cohen, Michael D. & Axelrod, Robert & Riolo, Rick, 2004. "Must there be human genes specific to prosocial behavior?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 49-51, January.
    6. Chaharborj, Sarkhosh Seddighi & Nabi, Khondoker Nazmoon & Feng, Koo Lee & Chaharborj, Shahriar Seddighi & Phang, Pei See, 2022. "Controlling COVID-19 transmission with isolation of influential nodes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Michael Daly & Liam Delaney & Séamus McManus, 2010. "Risk Attitudes as an Independent Predictor of Debt," Working Papers 201049, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    8. Farrukh Muhammad & Ying Chong Wei & Mansori Shaheen, 2016. "Intrapreneurial behavior: an empirical investigation of personality traits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 597-609, December.
    9. Mishra, Ankit & Wen, Tao & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2024. "Efficient traffic management in networks with limited resources: The switching routing strategy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Jan-Erik Loennqvist & Markku Verkasalo & Gari Walkowitz & Philipp C. Wichardt, 2011. "Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes in the Lab: Task or Ask? An Empirical Comparison," Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series 02-03, Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences.
    11. Raimond Mauer & Steffen P. Sebastian, 2002. "Inflation Risk Analysis of European Real Estate Securities," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 24(1), pages 47-78.
    12. J. Gareth Polhill & Dawn C. Parker & Daniel Brown & Volker Grimm, 2008. "Using the ODD Protocol for Describing Three Agent-Based Social Simulation Models of Land-Use Change," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3.
    13. Fatima Akhtar & K. S. Thyagaraj & Niladri Das, 2018. "Perceived Investment Performance of Individual Investors is Related to the Big-Five and the General Factor of Personality (GPF)," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 342-356, April.
    14. Marco Caliendo & Frank Fossen & Alexander Kritikos, 2014. "Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 787-814, April.
    15. Rasmusen, Eric, 1992. "Managerial Conservatism and Rational Information Acquisition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 175-201, Spring.
    16. Dimitris Iliopoulos & Arend Hintze & Christoph Adami, 2010. "Critical Dynamics in the Evolution of Stochastic Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    17. Michael Fritsch & Alina Rusakova, 2010. "Personality Traits, Self-Employment, and Professions," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 343, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    18. Chen, Zongjie & Zhang, Yigang & Kong, Qingkai & Fang, Ting & Wang, Jing, 2022. "Observer-based H∞ control for persistent dwell-time switched networked nonlinear systems under packet dropout," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    19. Robert Axtell, 2007. "What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 105-122, September.
    20. Mihaela DIACONU & Amalia DUTU, 2020. "Crisis, Uncertainty, Risk And Consumer Behavior: A Psycho-Economic Approach," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 19(2), pages 3-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922001217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.