IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v64y2021i1p61-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loyalty or lethargy? Keeping sellers committed, not entrenched

Author

Listed:
  • Jelinek, Ronald

Abstract

While business sellers frequently enjoy long-term relationships with their buyers, not every extended association is based on a genuine sense of customer loyalty. Many organizations remain in relationships with providers for too long; while the seller has stopped providing value, the buyer sticks to the routine. Building from empirical research and theory on buyer-seller relationships, this research extends our understanding of customer complacency and seller entrenchment and introduces the concept of customer lethargy. Synthesizing theory from multiple domains with exploratory interviews conducted with business customers, this article offers insight into the functioning of organizational buying centers, the evolution of business exchanges over time, and how some exchanges can be undermined by various forms of relational dysfunction. I define customer lethargy, explore its root causes and offer business buyers a strategy which aims to help them self-audit their loyalty, avoid complacency and lethargy, and keep sellers committed, not entrenched.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelinek, Ronald, 2021. "Loyalty or lethargy? Keeping sellers committed, not entrenched," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 61-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:64:y:2021:i:1:p:61-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681320301397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelinek, Ronald & Jelinek, Kate, 2010. "From clear to complicated: Buying and selling accounting services post Sarbanes-Oxley," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 511-522, September.
    2. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie J. Li, 2016. "When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 724-741, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faridzah Jamaluddin & Nizaroyani Saibani, 2021. "Systematic Literature Review of Supply Chain Relationship Approaches amongst Business-to-Business Partners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Musarra, Giuseppe & Kadile, Vita & Zaefarian, Ghasem & Oghazi, Pejvak & Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh, 2022. "Emotions, culture intelligence, and mutual trust in technology business relationships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Lu, Tingyu & Zhuang, Mengzhou & Zhuang, Guijun, 2021. "When does guanxi hurt interfirm cooperation? The moderating effects of institutional development and IT infrastructure capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 177-186.
    3. Jiang, Rong & Kang, Yuanjie & Liu, Yongsong & Liang, Zhihong & Duan, Yunlong & Sun, Yani & Liu, Jialan, 2022. "A trust transitivity model of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises under blockchain-based supply chain finance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh & Robson, Matthew J. & Zaefarian, Ghasem & Andersson, Ulf & Yu, Chong, 2018. "Building subsidiary local responsiveness: (When) does the directionality of intrafirm knowledge transfers matter?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 475-492.
    5. Yao, Qiongrui (Missy) & Baker, LaKami T. & Lohrke, Franz T., 2022. "Building and sustaining trust in remote work by platform-dependent entrepreneurs on digital labor platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 327-339.
    6. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhang, Chuang & Shen, Lu, 2020. "Deterring dealer slackness: The role of supplier incentives and monitoring and the market environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 353-363.
    7. Henn, Nicolas & Lohwasser, Todor S., 2020. "The advances of community cloud computing in the business-to-business buying process," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 6/2020, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    8. Wang, Shuai & Ma, Shuang, 2023. "Is product customization always beneficial in the context of C2M platforms? A signaling theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Arinze Christian Nwoba & Nathaniel Boso & Matthew J. Robson, 2021. "Corporate sustainability strategies in institutional adversity: Antecedent, outcome, and contingency effects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 787-807, February.
    10. Sheng Zou, 2021. "Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 140-149.
    11. Misani, Nicola, 2020. "Sustainability and Implicit Contracts," MPRA Paper 104963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jianhua Yang & Yuying Liu & Yajun Jia, 2022. "Influence of Trust Relationships with Suppliers on Manufacturer Resilience in COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Connelly, Brian L. & Shi, Wei & Cheng, Xin & Yin, Cheng, 2021. "Short Sellers: A screening theory perspective on B2B relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 393-404.
    14. Batwa, Abbas & Norrman, Andreas & Arvidsson, Ala, 2021. "How Blockchain interrelates with trust in the supply chain context: Insights from tracing sustainability in the metal industry," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 329-351, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Jaskiewicz, Peter & Block, Joern & Wagner, Dominik & Carney, Michael & Hansen, Christopher, 2021. "How do cross-country differences in institutional trust and trust in family explain the mixed performance effects of family management? A meta-analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    16. Yunhui Zhao & Chuanli Zhao & Yi Guo & Hongyan Sheng & Taiwen Feng, 2021. "Green supplier integration and environmental innovation in Chinese firms: The joint effect of governance mechanism and trust," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 169-183, January.
    17. Bai, Xuan & Wang, Qingtao & Sheng, Shibin & Li, Julie Juan, 2021. "Cross-level interpersonal ties and IJV innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 618-630.
    18. Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh & Mousavi, Sahar & Zaefarian, Ghasem & Naudé, Peter, 2020. "Relationship learning and international customer involvement in new product design: The moderating roles of customer dependence and cultural distance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 42-58.
    19. Abdurrezzak Sener & Mehmet Barut & Ali Dag & Mehmet Bayram Yildirim, 2021. "Impact of commitment, information sharing, and information usage on supplier performance: a Bayesian belief network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 125-158, August.
    20. Yu, Xiaoyu & Meng, Xiaotong & Chen, Yi & Chen, Yingying & Nguyen, Bang, 2018. "Work-family conflict, organizational ambidexterity and new venture legitimacy in emerging economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 229-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:64:y:2021:i:1:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.